I personally think Chinas strategy makes best sense.
Especially since west won’t afmit or even utter the name of Lausanne treaty or paris treaty. I think it makes better sense that we build and expand on artificial islands. If they start bitching we’ll force them to go back to lausanne.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to secure supply chain of the components? You find out that 4-5 armoured vehicle companies need suspension so it would make sense to have jv firmnproduce these suspension and optimize the process and do further R&D ( as an example). Instead of having all of them...
I think ucav are good enough for that. Pilots being captured isn’t something we want.
Use Vestel if you don’t want to jeapordize tb2.
But I think we should have some lowcost decent loitering ammo for same strikes as AZ used Harop
I think the Syria issue is more important, and the terrorist state they’re trying to build there. FP wise I don’t see Turkey in any strong position or a need for Israel to mend ties as of now.
In my eyes Turkey is more in dire needs of allies than the other way around.
That fence shows the need for administration of the border.
Pakistan could make bordergate for crossings to ease up and such. But people would still come up with excuses and talk it down. I think it’s the right thing to do.
Sounds like barking, but I think it’s necessary to strike hard and fast on strategic targets.
Russians favor slow mostling tactics, bullying someone into a corner.
But while he’s armed eveyday, Turkey gains more strategic weapons everyday. I hope we can field loitering ammo like harop seeing...