TR Air Defence Programs

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
20241104_131313.jpg

Screenshot_2024-11-04-13-13-00-551-edit_com.twitter.android.jpg

🤩🥳💪🏻 Ada-Class waiting for the VLS.

Could Barbaros class modernization be restructured with the horizontal 20X launcher instead of rear Phalanx?
 
Last edited:

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Size difference between Siper Block 2 and Hisar-RF (basically Siper Block 1 when booster attached) is something.

ENpQzmC.jpeg


G12P0aa.jpeg
So it seems there's no need for Siper B1( HisarRF+Booster)since there is SIPER B2.

BTW i have seen first time Siper Block 2🥰
 

CAN_TR

Contributor
Messages
1,480
Reactions
17 5,220
Nation of residence
Austria
Nation of origin
Turkey
So it seems there's no need for Siper B1( HisarRF+Booster)since there is SIPER B2.

BTW i have seen first time Siper Block 2🥰
Quiet the opposite SIPER B1 is needed very much, cheaper and effective up to ~100km, if you could fight a target with B1 why would you waste a B2? Everything has it's own use.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Quiet the opposite SIPER B1 is needed very much, cheaper and effective up to ~100km, if you could fight a target with B1 why would you waste a B2? Everything has it's own use.
For every target we already had cheaper, simplier Hisar RF instead of B2.

I don't think there's a big difference in terms of costs because of larger and taller rocket. B2 is not SM3 .
On the other hand what will be the maximum range of SIPER B2? Not 200km. The range must be app 150km .
Anyway.
 
Last edited:

somegoodusername

Committed member
Messages
225
Reactions
2 378
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't think there's a big difference in terms of costs because of larger and taller rocket. B2 is not SM3 .
On the other hand what will be the maximum range of SIPER B2? Not 200km. The range must be app 150km .
Anyway.
It's seeker/s are going to be larger/more advanced too. That would affect the cost of the missile.
 

neosinan

Committed member
Messages
236
Reactions
7 1,077
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Anyway we could be just speculating. If y'all think i won't insist

We are welcome B2 , Göksur 100 VLS 💪🏻🇹🇷
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,442
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,037
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I love the way new launcher, 100-N, looks. Now I just want to see it on an armoured vehicle and then my Warhammer 40K looking armoured vehicle fetish will be satisfied. 😬

Seriously though, I wonder if that turret could be used on an armoured vehicle (or even a light tank chassis maybe?) with all necessary sensors and stuff put on the vehicle itself, sort of like Gürz.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
735
Reactions
51 3,281
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I love the way new launcher, 100-N, looks. Now I just want to see it on an armoured vehicle and then my Warhammer 40K looking armoured vehicle fetish will be satisfied. 😬

Seriously though, I wonder if that turret could be used on an armoured vehicle (or even a light tank chassis maybe?) with all necessary sensors and stuff put on the vehicle itself, sort of like Gürz.
Last night I was thinking the same 20 ready to fire missiles would be imppresive for a land based varient prefrably ''trasportable'' almost a batterie worth of missiles in one single GOKSUR yet distributed architecture has more advantages in most cases but wait we can also create a distributed architecture from 20 missles variany of GÖKSUR all of sudden now you have 80 to 100 ready to fire missiles :devilish:
 
Last edited:

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I love the way new launcher, 100-N, looks. Now I just want to see it on an armoured vehicle and then my Warhammer 40K looking armoured vehicle fetish will be satisfied. 😬

Seriously though, I wonder if that turret could be used on an armoured vehicle (or even a light tank chassis maybe?) with all necessary sensors and stuff put on the vehicle itself, sort of like Gürz.
Having seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tank 😁
İt would be Kinda taller Fırtına howitzer.
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
735
Reactions
51 3,281
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Having seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tank 😁
İt would be Kinda taller Fırtına howitzer.
not on a vehicle but a land based '' trasportable '' variant with 20 missiles is a hard to ignore possibility


1730729449083.jpeg
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,442
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,037
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Having seen very closely Göksur-standalone launcher, i would say: No way! The launcher is huge and tall. It would be Eifel tower on the tank 😁
İt would be Kinda taller Fırtına howitzer.
Wouldn't be the first big launcher on a tank or IFV though

Pegasus aa system from South Korea
iu


TOS-1 from Russia
iu


This anti-tank system from China
iu


Maybe that launcher could be used as well, or not. Just a wish as I think having 20 missiles ready to fire on the move would do a lot of good.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom