TR Air Defence Programs

[UkroTurk]

Wouldn't be the first big launcher on a tank or IFV though

Pegasus aa system from South Korea

TOS-1 from Russia

This anti-tank system from China

Maybe that launcher could be used as well, or not. Just a wish as I think having 20 missiles ready to fire on the move would do a lot of good.

How could react the turret rapidly? For naval turret it Needs powerful motor , naval göksur is heavy as hell although TOS like systems rotate slowly.
Look at HisarA and Hisar O launcher, they preferred vertical launcher for quick reaction.

İf there were 4x Bozdoğan, it wouldn't be problem.

 

[boredaf]

How could react the turret rapidly? For naval turret it Needs powerful motor , naval göksur is heavy as hell although TOS like systems rotate slowly.

If this were to be actually done, I'm sure mechanical stuff like that could be solved and I would imagine missile itself would be capable of manoeuvring as well, since these are supposed to give full coverage to a ship, don't they?

 

[UkroTurk]

If this were to be actually done, I'm sure mechanical stuff like that could be solved and I would imagine missile itself would be capable of manoeuvring as well, since these are supposed to give full coverage to a ship, don't they?

Gökdoğan and Bozdoğan SAMs could be used on land vehicles like Israeli SPYDER but not with naval launchers that are heavy.

On the other hand Göksur VLS would be okay on trailers/lories if the VLS cost cheap.

I have another question
According to the photo, Bottom of the cell is open? How does exhausts, flames exit vertically? There must be cover box.

 

[Kaan Azman]

It is a representative image, just something I unknowingly made according to GÖKSUR IIR's predicted dimmesions off the shelf at that moment

 

[Saithan]

Is it a good idea to load so much ona single vehicle with all the loitering ammo, drones and ucavs around ? Imagine how we'd glee when tb2 etc. Hits vehicles like these.

 

[Afif]

I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider

 

[hugh]

I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider

what is siper block 3? an ABM?

 

[Afif]

what is siper block 3? an ABM?

Yes. It's been mentioned many times.

 

[Sanchez]

I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider

Will probably need some larger radars than T/EIRS.

what is siper block 3? an ABM?

Proposed Anti Ballistic Missile variant of Siper family with 180+km range.

 

[hugh]

Yes. It's been mentioned many times.

was that confirmed officially(ABM feature) or is it the logical conclusion of the members?

 

[Radonsider]

Will probably need some larger radars than T/EIRS.


Proposed Anti Ballistic Missile variant of Siper family with 180+km range.

ALP-600G

And I am damn sure that Siper B2 has more than 150km range, by a lot

 

[Sanchez]

ALP-600G

And I am damn sure that Siper B2 has more than 150km range, by a lot

Oh yeah. That should be a behemoth.

was that confirmed officially(ABM feature) or is it the logical conclusion of the members?

It was used back to back with ABM feature I believe but haven't been officially confirmed, correct me if so. But, we know that Siper will be tasked with ABM duties, 600-G radar is in development and a 180km+ range with up to 30km altitude missile would be expected to have terminal phase interception ability.