Around the half then.I think firtina will be 1.5-2.5
Around the half then.I think firtina will be 1.5-2.5
I think they aim to compensate the air superiority that greek will gain on the short and intermediate term with rafael and vipers by improve the air defence umbrella with s400,siper,hisars, and other systems until tfx enter the service .. it need a lot of work to build highly capable air defence networkİsmail Demir second system S-400 for reception, "All interviews and agreement with Russia were made over 2 systems. Common production, technology was interviewed. A specified distance has been taken. Description of Russia is indicative of the end of the study."
İkinci sistem S-400'ün ortak üretimi, teknoloji konularında ilerleme var
SSB Başkanı Prof. Dr. İsmail Demir, İkinci sistem S-400 Hava Savunma Füze Sistemi (HSFS) hakkında önemli açıklamalarda bulunduwww.defenceturk.net
No, until F-16 Ozgur with AESA radar and Gokhan BVR missile enters service...until tfx enter the service
Gokhan is long term project ..dont expect it before 2025-2026 ... Also f16 upgrade programe will require at least 4-5 years ..these things take time .. short term solutions should be considered .. i mean before 2025No, until F-16 Ozgur with AESA radar and Gokhan BVR missile enters service...
And TF-X will not enter service before 2029...Gokhan is long term project ..dont expect it before 2025-2026 ... Also f16 upgrade programe will require at least 4-5 years ..these things take time .. short term solutions should be considered .. i mean before 2025
Yes of course ..first one likely 2030 .. so .the available solutions is to improve the air defence systems / improve radars and EW / upgrade f16sAnd TF-X will not enter service before 2029...
This was discussed in the savtera forum. But I think it was decided it can't illuminate a missile but can prompt gökdeniz. By the way the reason can be to use aesa radar, to use an x band radar, to utilize more rotational speed (which actually reduces the time interval spent on the illumination of missile by fcr), to be more protected against jamming ...Yesterday I heard that MAR-D radar can guide semi-active radar guided missiles with its digital beamforming capability. And that's why they want to use MAR-D on Barbaros Class, it would allow multiple engagements without needing separete illumination radars. There isn't any information about it in PDFs or product catalogues. Is it true ? @TheInsider @Anmdt @Cabatli_53
It might be but we can't know it for sure. Mar-D is an X band AESA(basically like a fighter radar) radar. It can certainly be used to illuminate a target for a semi-active RF-guided missile if Aselsan wants it or TN demands it. I doubt adding the capability to illuminate a target to MAR-D and calling it Mar-D block II is a very hard thing for Aselsan at this stage. Genesys Advent can certainly take advantage of such a sensor if a move like this is planned. IMO it will be an excellent move and add a big capability and a new dimension to the upgrade package. There is a possibility but is there such a thing? Who knows?Yesterday I heard that MAR-D radar can guide semi-active radar guided missiles with its digital beamforming capability. And that's why they want to use MAR-D on Barbaros Class, it would allow multiple engagements without needing separete illumination radars. There isn't any information about it in PDFs or product catalogues. Is it true ? @TheInsider @Anmdt @Cabatli_53
S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability.The system presented by İsmail Demir as the S400 equivalent domestic missile will probably be a system with exoatmospheric interception capability against ballistic missiles and capable of reaching altitudes of around 150-200km. In parallel to these developments, a giant early warning ballistic missile detection radar system called YIR, which will have thousands of km ranges was scheduled as next target after EIRS become operational. As EIRS was developed to be the main early warning radar of Siper family, I think YIR will be the main radar of the S400 equivalent domestic missiles.
Theoretically it can do, it would be a software upgrade on the radar side,and an addition on the CMS side. Practically i am not sure if it will have any benefits, it is a radar mainly considered for FACs and OPVs at the moment and there are others for an actual APAR guidance (CAFRAD, a liter variant, X-DAR)Yesterday I heard that MAR-D radar can guide semi-active radar guided missiles with its digital beamforming capability. And that's why they want to use MAR-D on Barbaros Class, it would allow multiple engagements without needing separete illumination radars. There isn't any information about it in PDFs or product catalogues. Is it true ? @TheInsider @Anmdt @Cabatli_53
S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability.
I think it would be primarily air defence system for againt air breathing targets...Not missile defence system..
İsmail Demir's talk about ''domestic S-400'' is answer for TRT reporter's question ''S-400 ayarında bir savunma sistemini ne zaman yapabiliriz?''
I think it would be more like equivalent SM-6 missile...And most likely Siper=Sm-2 BIIIC....Siper+Booster=SM-6
Siper=SM-2 Block IVA(cancelled)S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability.
I think it would be primarily air defence system for againt air breathing targets...Not missile defence system..
İsmail Demir's talk about ''domestic S-400'' is answer for TRT reporter's question ''S-400 ayarında bir savunma sistemini ne zaman yapabiliriz?''
I think it would be more like equivalent SM-6 missile...And most likely Siper=Sm-2 BIIIC....Siper+Booster=SM-6
It would be great when many long range sam arrive in market .Siper=SM-2 Block IVA(cancelled)
Yes, it does but not export variant.S-400 does not have exoatmospheric interception capability.
It would be very hard to do and money consumingI have a question to experienced members, Can a country buy various labelled air defense systems from various countries and make them work as one system ? And if yes what they should use to organise the work of the systems together
Such comparisons are usually made on the basis of ranges. When he say S-400 equivalent, i suppose the ranges are compared, not the mission profile. I believe that Turkey will follow the NATO strategy. Therefore, instead of a huge air defense system that can only hit air-breathing targets up to 400km range and limited missile defense capability, I believe a missile defence system which will have advanced ballistic missile defence capability and that can work together with Siper air defense family are developed based on Siper experience. While Siper cover the altitudes up to 30-35km, This new system will expand the protection umbrella up to 100-150km in altitude. The "Long Range High Altitude" missile which was once called GUMS and later stated to have being developed locally will be the missile emphasized as "S400 counterpart" However unlike the S400 mission profile, I think that this missile, with its dual mode seeker and DACS-controlled KV load, will perform both air defense duty at longer ranges and missile defense in an exo-atmospheric environment when necessary like THAAD. This is my prediction. We will wait and see.