TR Air Defence Programs

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
54 4,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Wouldn't be the first big launcher on a tank or IFV though

Pegasus aa system from South Korea
iu


TOS-1 from Russia
iu


This anti-tank system from China
iu


Maybe that launcher could be used as well, or not. Just a wish as I think having 20 missiles ready to fire on the move would do a lot of good.
How could react the turret rapidly? For naval turret it Needs powerful motor , naval göksur is heavy as hell although TOS like systems rotate slowly.
Look at HisarA and Hisar O launcher, they preferred vertical launcher for quick reaction.

İf there were 4x Bozdoğan, it wouldn't be problem.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,909
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
How could react the turret rapidly? For naval turret it Needs powerful motor , naval göksur is heavy as hell although TOS like systems rotate slowly.
If this were to be actually done, I'm sure mechanical stuff like that could be solved and I would imagine missile itself would be capable of manoeuvring as well, since these are supposed to give full coverage to a ship, don't they?
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
54 4,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If this were to be actually done, I'm sure mechanical stuff like that could be solved and I would imagine missile itself would be capable of manoeuvring as well, since these are supposed to give full coverage to a ship, don't they?
1730735716148.jpeg


Gökdoğan and Bozdoğan SAMs could be used on land vehicles like Israeli SPYDER but not with naval launchers that are heavy.

On the other hand Göksur VLS would be okay on trailers/lories if the VLS cost cheap.

1730735212435.jpeg

I have another question ❓
According to the photo, Bottom of the cell is open? How does exhausts, flames exit vertically? There must be cover box.
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,632
Reactions
37 19,741
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Is it a good idea to load so much ona single vehicle with all the loitering ammo, drones and ucavs around ? Imagine how we'd glee when tb2 etc. Hits vehicles like these.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,746
Reactions
94 9,067
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider
 

hugh

Active member
Messages
100
Reactions
2 295
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider
what is siper block 3? an ABM?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,340
Reactions
79 10,713
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I am wondering if SIPER block 3 can be integrated seamlessly with existing C2 and sensor architecture like block 2 is supposed to be. In this way TUrAF and potential export operators can gain ABM capability just by procuring the interceptor. @TheInsider
Will probably need some larger radars than T/EIRS.

what is siper block 3? an ABM?
Proposed Anti Ballistic Missile variant of Siper family with 180+km range.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,340
Reactions
79 10,713
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
ALP-600G

And I am damn sure that Siper B2 has more than 150km range, by a lot
Oh yeah. That should be a behemoth.

was that confirmed officially(ABM feature) or is it the logical conclusion of the members?
It was used back to back with ABM feature I believe but haven't been officially confirmed, correct me if so. But, we know that Siper will be tasked with ABM duties, 600-G radar is in development and a 180km+ range with up to 30km altitude missile would be expected to have terminal phase interception ability.
 

Fairon

Well-known member
Messages
410
Reactions
6 1,022
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Our ‚beloved‘ expert, Eray Güclüer told, we are testing Siper block 3 with a range of over 300km?

All I am wondering is, what made him stop at 300km? He could have said we are testing Spier Block 3 with over 500km's.(Exceeding S400 range)

Maybe he will next time.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,468
Reactions
14 2,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Do we count the effective range or do we count the ballistic range as the Russians do?
1- Russians don't count the ballistic range, you can actually find the diagrams for their missiles

2- Well, Siper B2 is bigger than the SM-6 but also weights less, they claim 240-400km for SM-6 so I don't think that it unreasonable to expect something like this from Siper B2
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
935
Reactions
13 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
1- Russians don't count the ballistic range, you can actually find the diagrams for their missiles

2- Well, Siper B2 is bigger than the SM-6 but also weights less, they claim 240-400km for SM-6 so I don't think that it unreasonable to expect something like this from Siper B2
At that point the limitation is the kill chain, that is communication and sensors rather than propulsion. Hisar missiles were also given increased range after seeker improvements.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,468
Reactions
14 2,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
At that point the limitation is the kill chain, that is communication and sensors rather than propulsion. Hisar missiles were also given increased range after seeker improvements.
Indeed, and that's why ASELSAN is working on new missile seekers (big AESA seeker for Siper B2 and smaller ones for Gökhan and G/M-1)

Also, it is important to note that ASELSAN is currently working on radars with performance or doctrine never seen in TAF before. ALP-600G is a building-radar. (I don't exactly know the terminology, but they are radars as big as buildings, not radars on top of a building but radars being the building itself)

These building-radars are used for satellite and ballistic missile tracking by the US and Russia. Don-2N, Daryal, Dnepr, Voronezh, AN/FPS-85/115/132, LRDR etc.

ALP-500G (mounted on top of a building):
1000005477.png

1000005478.png


ALP-600G (building-radar):
1000005476.png

1000005475.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000005474.jpg
    1000005474.jpg
    37 KB · Views: 27
  • 1000005465.jpg
    1000005465.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 22
  • 1000005471.jpg
    1000005471.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 21
  • 1000005470.jpg
    1000005470.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 23
  • 1000005473.jpg
    1000005473.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 22
  • 1000005469.jpg
    1000005469.jpg
    43.1 KB · Views: 21
  • 1000005468.jpg
    1000005468.jpg
    416.7 KB · Views: 21
  • 1000005466.jpg
    1000005466.jpg
    74.6 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
Top Bottom