TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,719
Solutions
1
Reactions
45 16,396
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
At some point, stealth loses its importance. Let's say F-35 sees KE at 20km and KE sees F-35 at 10km. The fighter with 360-degree IR detection and tracking will have the upper hand.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,055
Reactions
12 3,793
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
I started this discussion of drone vs F35, because all nations (who can build it) are rushing now to build stealth "loyal wingman" drones.

The basic idea is of course that these drones fly ahead of the "mothership" 5th or 6th generation fighter jet. They will serve both ways, if they can detect the enemy fighter or drone first the first to release the missile will be at advantage. But even if the drone is shotdown, it may give the mothership time to shoot the missiles and scoot.

So my argument of KE vs F35 is not just a fantasy, it's a quite probable scenario in the short future
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,985
Reactions
103 9,652
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
KE vs F35 makes as much sense as Kaan vs F35

Stealth seems to be the determining factor, see first shoot first. Question is how stealth is KE and how stealth will be Kaan (assuming that 0.01 RCS is a real value for F35, cos honestly we do not know the real RCS of F35 neither)

Obviously the exact number is classified. But what we know from OSINT so far, it is pretty reliable to assume it is atleast –30 dB, possibly more. Which means a 0.001 RCS. (Sea a clean F-35's radar scattering simulation in X band, and then the new gen RAM is ought to minimize the RCS by -20 dB at least, possibly by -25 dB.)
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,864
Solutions
1
Reactions
31 5,404
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
A 4th gen fighter jet stands no chance against 5th gen.
Point of having new and capable 4th, or rather 4.5, gen planes is not to have them go against 5th gen planes. 5th gen planes are expensive to produce AND to fly, that's why even US and China is still buying/producing 4th gen planes. When US air force asked the Congress for permission to retire 150 aircraft, neither F-16s nor F-15s were included in that list. You don't need to use an F-35/J-20 for every mission, sometimes an F-15 or J-10 does the job just fine. Why put extra hours on the engine and the frame unnecessarily, and for a high price? Smaller nations that barely have an air force worth mentioning might transition all the way to 5th gen but for nations that have to have a big air force for diverse missions it is neither economical nor logical.

One should not rely on others and not spend a cent more in the USA & Europe. Instead, use the money you would pay for the Eurofighter/F-16 to invest directly in the Hürjet & F-16 Özgur I & II and accelerate them to the absolute maximum.
So that everything is completed in 2-3 years at the latest and all Turkish F-16s are upgraded to the equivalent of Block 70.
And 10 additional Hürjets will be available as Block 0 for TCG Anadolu.
Then 10 more Hürjets every year, and we would have a buffer until KAAN arrives.
Then neither Greece nor Saudi Arabia & Co would have a certain head start.
The KAAN project can then be completed in parallel without any pressure, and at least 3-4 prototypes can be produced by 2029 to correct all errors. The first Block 0 could then be produced directly with its own engine in 2030.
Until then, there would also be the opportunity to make minor design changes to the aircraft, and additionally to get an improved version of MURAD AESA radar as version 2.0, and improved AVIONIK and the radar-absorbing coating/painting from the findings of the Anka 3/Kizilelma and F-16 Özgur and Hürjet.
Hürjet is a year or two away from starting its production as a trainer. There isn't even a proper light attack configuration yet, let alone a naval version. It isn't even a naval aircraft, there are multiple parts/systems that would have to be changed for it to be one. And TCG Anadolu itself would have to go through major changes to be able to use Hürjet, hell as it is, it won't even be able to use KE.

And all of these doesn't just take money, it also takes time, resources and manpower. What makes you think that only thing slowing down Hürjet and Özgür project is money? You are making a lot of assumptions based on nothing but it'll all be faster if we just throw money at it. There are only so many designers, engineers and technicians with different expertise that can work on these projects, just as only so many companies, which are also handling other projects.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,055
Reactions
12 3,793
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Point of having new and capable 4th, or rather 4.5, gen planes is not to have them go against 5th gen planes. 5th gen planes are expensive to produce AND to fly, that's why even US and China is still buying/producing 4th gen planes. When US air force asked the Congress for permission to retire 150 aircraft, neither F-16s nor F-15s were included in that list. You don't need to use an F-35/J-20 for every mission, sometimes an F-15 or J-10 does the job just fine. Why put extra hours on the engine and the frame unnecessarily, and for a high price? Smaller nations that barely have an air force worth mentioning might transition all the way to 5th gen but for nations that have to have a big air force for diverse missions it is neither economical nor logical.

Sure I do not disagree with that, but see US and China buying 4th gen is to support their own industry and that is not a dumb thing to do. Question is who do we support if we chose at this point a 4th gen?

Chosing a Hurjet light fighter would be acceptable just like US and China is doing. Chosing an F16 (albait also there I am in principle against buying new 40 fighters) is logistically seen defendable, but Eurofighter is sheer madness.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,133
Reactions
15 1,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
F35 doesn't even have a useable cannon so ( B and C don't have ir and A has defective cannon) so obviously F16 is gonna be the better dogfighter. But it really doesn't mean anything in practice when you get shot down from 100km.
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,055
Reactions
12 3,793
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
F35 doesn't even have a useable cannon so ( B and C don't have ir and A has defective cannon) so obviously F16 is gonna be the better dogfighter. But it really doesn't mean anything in practice when you get shot down from 100km.

This is exactly where the "stealth" factor of 5th generation impacts. See first, shoot first.

Besides dogfights nowadays only occur during training with "friendly" forces. When was the last time a fighter jet was downed in a dogfight?
 

Cenkcnk

Committed member
Messages
201
Reactions
1 409
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
germany approved Eurofighter sales to KSA.
Let's see what they are gonna do for our request.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,701
Reactions
14 4,799
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes I guess so, not my opinion but that of an experienced US pilot.
I am little bit sceptical about that. I think its more the pilot than the jet itself who makes the different. F-16 is a 50! years old jet. They know all their ins and outs. In contrast to the F-35.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,701
Reactions
14 4,799
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
We have round about 300 fighter jets. How many do we need in future? If we think on Kaan and our geopolitical expansions.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,133
Reactions
15 1,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The fact that KSA got eurofighter approval for being buddy buddy with Israel makes me increasingly think that this was a slight to us. Basically teasing us and its even less likely for us to get eurofighters now, as the production lines will have more orders too our 40 won't make a difference now.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,701
Reactions
14 4,799
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Besides dogfights nowadays only occur during training with "friendly" forces. When was the last time a fighter jet was downed in a dogfight?
Greece, Iran, Armenia..if these are possible enemies in the future, dogfights are very likely.
 

Bogeyman 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
9,514
Reactions
72 31,885
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
American pilot about F16 vs F35
He basically says F16 beats F35 in dogfight, but from distance F16 has no chance. A 4th gen fighter jet stands no chance against 5th gen. that's why I am vehemently opposed against purchase of Eurofighter (pure crap)





4th gen fighter stands no chance against F35

But what about Kizilelma vs F35? I really would like to hear stealth assessments from Baykar, how stealth is Kizilelma?
It's not just about F-16 vs F-35, though. There are also land-based early warning radars + passive radars + AWACS etc. Therefore, you cannot create a picture on an issue that concerns Turkey by ignoring the effectiveness of other components of the war. It is also very important which radar is on the F-16s. Apg-86? Or is there AESA radar? Even these details make the F-35 outshine its clear lead.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,701
Reactions
14 4,799
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Don't think so, Turkiye shot in the last 10 years 1 Russian and 2 Syrian craft, none of them by dogfight
I know, that you know details on both incidents. Syria is broke and one Russian jet kill, doesnt count much. Lets take a (full out) war with Greece. Imagine the hundreds of fighter jet. Than the sight range of the enemy on both sides. The moment where both sides have their jets in the sky, they are in sight range for both. Sooner or later, it will come to a dogfight.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,133
Reactions
15 1,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I know, that you know details on both incidents. Syria is broke and one Russian jet kill, doesnt count much. Lets take a (full out) war with Greece. Imagine the hundreds of fighter jet. Than the sight range of the enemy on both sides. The moment where both sides have their jets in the sky, they are in sight range for both. Sooner or later, it will come to a dogfight.
Absolutely won't be anything like this
 

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,055
Reactions
12 3,793
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
In very exceptional cases perhaps but it would be extremely odd since Greeks modernize their F16's with AESA. They'd be stupid to engage our F16's with dogfight
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,291
Reactions
114 19,728
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
After our brother @Boz shared his concept of a manned Kizilelma I liked it a lot!

1704705353291.png


What would be the future of a 4.5 Gen, low cost, stealth, light attack aircraft for the Turkish Air Forces adapted for carrier operations influenced by HURJET and Kizilelma? I think the concept may be good.

I know we will have a very serious fleet of 5th Gen KAAN, but they are like jewels. I am thinking of something combining stealth, acceptable sensor package, weapons integration and low operating costs that may serve both the Turkish Air Forces, but also be an export oriented product for developing countries that wouldn't be able to afford KAAN or other 5th Gen aircraft, but will be able to afford a modern, but simple package that will have the ability to take on other 4/4.5 Gen non-stealth aircraft. Think it like the future of aircrafts like HURJET, FA-50 and M-346. What do you guys think?
 
Top Bottom