TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

Brave Janissary

Well-known member
Messages
310
Reactions
5 635
If we capable the make L-55 cannon in mkek with under licence we must modify Leopard 2a4's. Just because Germans and Greeks dont want 1500 hp class (thats effect the capability of armour), L-55 carrier tanks on us. Just because if we have them we can be establish a advantage againts greek leopard 2a6hel's .

If we have him with great numbers the way of modernization of leopard 2's there is no way to contiune the ban to Turkey on the field of engines. That is only lose of money.

On the other hand for a Place Of The Leopard 2a4T1 Around Modern Tanks

 

Mis_TR_Like

Contributor
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
1,338
Reactions
25 5,083
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
Can't we convert the TS1400 to a gas turbine engine which is suitable for the Altay tank? I know they are notoriously thirsty engines (look at the Abrams tank's engine [Honeywell AGT1500]), but hey, it's our only indigenous engine which has enough power for the Altay. Plus the power to weight ratio of gas turbine engines is excellent, so we could save some weight this way.

Of course chances are we'll stick to a conventional engine. The project is already very delayed. This will just complicate things further. However it is a theoretically possible solution, just not a very practical one.

If we poured so much resources into the TS1400, and we knew that a combustion engine was no where near ready for the Altay tank, then we should've gone through this route. It could've been the engine which powered the first batch of Altays. Too late now I guess.
 
T

Turko

Guest
Can't we convert the TS1400 to a gas turbine engine which is suitable for the Altay tank? I know they are notoriously thirsty engines (look at the Abrams tank's engine [Honeywell AGT1500]), but hey, it's our only indigenous engine which has enough power for the Altay. Plus the power to weight ratio of gas turbine engines is excellent, so we could save some weight this way.

Of course chances are we'll stick to a conventional engine. The project is already very delayed. This will just complicate things further. However it is a theoretically possible solution, just not a very practical one.

If we poured so much resources into the TS1400, and we knew that a combustion engine was no where near ready for the Altay tank, then we should've gone through this route. It could've been the engine which powered the first batch of Altays. Too late now I guess.
A total of over 10,000 tanks have been equipped with GTD-1000T/1250 engines.

Russians have 3000-4000 old T-80 with turbine engine. IMO Fuel consumption should be calculated by hp. Also they are multi fuel burner flying beasts 80km/h.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ANGMAR

Committed member
Moderator
Egypt Moderator
Messages
236
Reactions
526
Nation of residence
Egypt
Nation of origin
Egypt

Turkey in talks with South Korea to salvage Altay tank program​



YCNCNSPTTFGN5LN2XBOHLEOITI.jpg

An early version of Turkey's Altay tank participates in a military parade in Ankara, Turkey, on Aug. 30, 2015. (Burhan Ozbilici/AP)​


ANKARA, Turkey — Turkish procurement and military officials as well as teams from a private manufacturer have been negotiating with a South Korean company to recover a program riddled with delays for the production of the country’s first indigenous new-generation main battle tank.
“This program has faced major delays due to failed access to significant components like the engine, transmission and armor,” a procurement official told Defense News. “I am not in a position to give a date for the start of serial production. All I know is we are trying hard to get it moved ahead.”
https://www.defensenews.com/industr...th-south-korea-to-salvage-altay-tank-program/
any news about the engine and the transmitter ?
 

Philip the Arab

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,333
Reactions
4 2,222
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Jordan

Turkey in talks with South Korea to salvage Altay tank program​



YCNCNSPTTFGN5LN2XBOHLEOITI.jpg

An early version of Turkey's Altay tank participates in a military parade in Ankara, Turkey, on Aug. 30, 2015. (Burhan Ozbilici/AP)​


ANKARA, Turkey — Turkish procurement and military officials as well as teams from a private manufacturer have been negotiating with a South Korean company to recover a program riddled with delays for the production of the country’s first indigenous new-generation main battle tank.
“This program has faced major delays due to failed access to significant components like the engine, transmission and armor,” a procurement official told Defense News. “I am not in a position to give a date for the start of serial production. All I know is we are trying hard to get it moved ahead.”
https://www.defensenews.com/industr...th-south-korea-to-salvage-altay-tank-program/
any news about the engine and the transmitter ?
At this point I expect serial production in 2030.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,052
Reactions
116 14,899
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
you just jump to say price of missiles or tanks that totally wrong and based on bullshit.. come on... show me a single place where officially were told about the price of Altay or American one? now you talk about Atmaca price? stop it..
Before you become confrontational, I suggest you check some figures!
Mr Ethem Sancak has said it himself that the other competitor (KOC) gave a price of 7 billion Euros for 250 Altay tanks. As BMC their offer was for 4 billion Euros. But RTE shaved of a further 0.5 billion Euros. And the deal was finalised at 3.5 billion Euros. You do the math; with Euro/US dollar at 0.82 rate today it makes 17 million dollars per tank.
M1 Abrams
ManufacturerLima Army Tank Plant (since 1980) Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant (1982–1996)
Unit costUS$6.21 million (M1A2 / FY99) Estimated in 2016 as US$8.92 million (with inflation adjustment)
Produced
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,175
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Before you become confrontational, I suggest you check some figures!
Mr Ethem Sancak has said it himself that the other competitor (KOC) gave a price of 7 billion Euros for 250 Altay tanks. As BMC their offer was for 4 billion Euros. But RTE shaved of a further 0.5 billion Euros. And the deal was finalised at 3.5 billion Euros. You do the math; with Euro/US dollar at 0.82 rate today it makes 17 million dollars per tank.
M1 Abrams
ManufacturerLima Army Tank Plant (since 1980) Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant (1982–1996)
Unit costUS$6.21 million (M1A2 / FY99) Estimated in 2016 as US$8.92 million (with inflation adjustment)
Produced
Might include spare parts, maintenance for a dedicated term.Unit cost of an asset is not same as the amount given in contracts which covers more than just delivery of the items..
 

chngr

Active member
Messages
39
Reactions
1 138
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Before you become confrontational, I suggest you check some figures!
Mr Ethem Sancak has said it himself that the other competitor (KOC) gave a price of 7 billion Euros for 250 Altay tanks. As BMC their offer was for 4 billion Euros. But RTE shaved of a further 0.5 billion Euros. And the deal was finalised at 3.5 billion Euros. You do the math; with Euro/US dollar at 0.82 rate today it makes 17 million dollars per tank.
M1 Abrams
ManufacturerLima Army Tank Plant (since 1980) Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant (1982–1996)
Unit costUS$6.21 million (M1A2 / FY99) Estimated in 2016 as US$8.92 million (with inflation adjustment)
Produced
Your source is very vey cheap

Taiwan buy $2 billion for 108 M1A2T Abrams Tanks....And does not have APS


17 million USD is not only for Altay.....Development of T3 and life cycle logistics takes a lot of money.I think the price is low for this

I think 250 Altay is not 3.5 billion euros....Maybe about 2 billion euros


1608558694728.jpg
 

AzeriTank

Contributor
Messages
692
Reactions
2 1,760
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Your source is very vey cheap

Taiwan buy $2 billion for 108 M1A2T Abrams Tanks....And does not have APS


17 million USD is not only for Altay.....Development of T3 and life cycle logistics takes a lot of money.I think the price is low for this

I think 250 Altay is not 3.5 billion euros....Maybe about 2 billion euros


View attachment 9318
it even included developing an engine for Altay Tank... Does Yashar know how hard to develop a 1500hp engine and Renk type of transmission? even included a center to develop new technologies for tank.. and other things you mentioned above.. this way it is really cheap offer..
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,052
Reactions
116 14,899
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
it even included developing an engine for Altay Tank... Does Yashar know how hard to develop a 1500hp engine and Renk type of transmission? even included a center to develop new technologies for tank.. and other things you mentioned above.. this way it is really cheap offer..
Have you got source that says the price quoted by Ethem Sancak includes engine and transmission development? As far as I know it does not!
The quote was given on the basis of buying the Tank’s engine and transmission from MTU and Renk, as at the time of the quotation there were no problems with Germany regarding Altay englne and components. Problems started to happen after our military entered Northern Syria, which was way after the date of the quote.
(The quote was given on 18th January 2016. Euphrates Shield Started on 24th August2016 and lasted 7 months. Altay engine supply line was put in danger in 2017 by Germany’s decision to stop supplying equipment that can be used in Northern Syria. And later on Germany suspended tank upgrading parts shipment on 25th January 2018)

Quote:
Altay Tankı'nın geliştirmesi işi Koç Grubu'na bağlı Otokar firmasına verilmişti. Bu firma gerekli çalışmaları yaptı, tankın protipini geliştirdi ve seri üretim için hazır hale getirdi. Seri üretime geçmek için 18 Ocak 2016'da Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı'na teklifte bulunuldu.
unquote.
 

AzeriTank

Contributor
Messages
692
Reactions
2 1,760
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Have you got source that says the price quoted by Ethem Sancak includes engine and transmission development? As far as I know it does not!
The quote was given on the basis of buying the Tank’s engine and transmission from MTU and Renk, as at the time of the quotation there were no problems with Germany regarding Altay englne and components. Problems started to happen after our military entered Northern Syria, which was way after the date of the quote.
(The quote was given on 18th January 2016. Euphrates Shield Started on 24th August2016 and lasted 7 months. Altay engine supply line was put in danger in 2017 by Germany’s decision to stop supplying equipment that can be used in Northern Syria. And later on Germany suspended tank upgrading parts shipment on 25th January 2018)

Quote:
Altay Tankı'nın geliştirmesi işi Koç Grubu'na bağlı Otokar firmasına verilmişti. Bu firma gerekli çalışmaları yaptı, tankın protipini geliştirdi ve seri üretim için hazır hale getirdi. Seri üretime geçmek için 18 Ocak 2016'da Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı'na teklifte bulunuldu.
unquote.

1608558694728.jpg


i said based on this picture...
 

chngr

Active member
Messages
39
Reactions
1 138
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Most of cost not engine...But development of T3 and life cycle logistics

Especially life cycle logistics
 

Quasar

Contributor
The Post Deleter
Messages
577
Reactions
34 2,585
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can't we convert the TS1400 to a gas turbine engine which is suitable for the Altay tank? I know they are notoriously thirsty engines (look at the Abrams tank's engine [Honeywell AGT1500]), but hey, it's our only indigenous engine which has enough power for the Altay. Plus the power to weight ratio of gas turbine engines is excellent, so we could save some weight this way.

Of course chances are we'll stick to a conventional engine. The project is already very delayed. This will just complicate things further. However it is a theoretically possible solution, just not a very practical one.

If we poured so much resources into the TS1400, and we knew that a combustion engine was no where near ready for the Altay tank, then we should've gone through this route. It could've been the engine which powered the first batch of Altays. Too late now I guess.
there was an interview with SSB president Demir sure it will be not a word by word qoutatiıon but it seems that TS1400 was considered even hybrid solutions were considered for ALTAY's engine but because of concerns over high maintenance and logistic cost it was not materilized but I strongly belive that at least we have to work on a few experimental prototypes just incase.
 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,052
Reactions
116 14,899
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
1608558694728.jpg


i said based on this picture...
Let us get our facts straight!
This document is a “project development“ document issued by SSB. Turkish SSB, does not open tenders. It is the Ministery of Defence that opens tenders. Because they are the BUYERS.
SSB starts projects with companies, be it state owned or private. It is the job of Ministery of defence to open a tender for a finished project for various companies to forward their quotes.
First Altay development PROJECT was given to Otokar, by, then the equivalent of today’s SSB. They produced the first prototypes. But for the order stage a tender was opened to produce the tank by the MoD. And this tender was won by BMC with a price of 3.5 billion Euros.
So my question still stands. Do you have a source that first 3.5 billion Euro quote Ethem Sancak gave included all the work stated in above ”project” document?
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom