Look at this size
Latest Thread
Bro dont show those kind of monsters or i will going to see a nightmare when i sleep
The Godzilla of Attack Helicopters.
Forget everything about its looks, just think about that MTOW and 24 ATGMs. Forget Apache, this is the real tank killer. It is a monster.
The inner pylons can certainly carry 6-rail racks. Both in weight and height. God please let the relevant teams of Roketsan be preparing this type of product. In tank hunter beast mode, we still need other 4 pylons.
This monster is capable to carry
24 umtas gm (30 km expected range)
Or 16 kuzgun ky (40 km range)
Or 12 kuzgun tj (180 km range)
Or 4 çakır (150 + km range) and 4 kuzgun tj
We should evaluate it when it is finished.Aaaand we officially have the ugliest helicopter! Well done to us!
It is quite surprising that a company that can produce such an aesthetic product as Kaan produces such a shapeless thing.
I expect him to carry kemankeş (30 kg weight). Kemankeş has 360 km max range and a data transfer ability of 100 km (now 50 +, but they will imprıve). So our monster can launch some of them in swarm formation both to look around, search and destroy targets and also guide its long range missiles like kuzgun ky, kuzgun tj and çakır in man in the loop mode. Imagine 4 atak 2 in the air carrying dozens of these missiles and kemankeşsBecause sheer size and huge armament. Could it be that there are wingmen UAV ??? or alone ??? any info or configuration known in the world ?
Don't forget Alpagut. I guess it can carry 16+. It's 45 kg munition with 11 kg warhead, and 60+ km range.This monster is capable to carry
24 umtas gm (30 km expected range)
Or 16 kuzgun ky (40 km range)
Or 12 kuzgun tj (180 km range)
Or 4 çakır (150 + km range) and 4 kuzgun tj
AA reporter Göksel Yıldırım reported the opposite."According to what i learnt"
Meanwhile Yusuf Akbaba;
I would take him least credible on this matter. He is clearly denying engineers on management position who have spoken few days ago on the matter. They clearly indicated the design will go through changes and this is merely a prototype made to fly. Likely not even a P0.
And people who relies on this information and reposts it here without quoting the source should be careful.
I know requirements of TN and i know naval and land forces versions will have minimal differences. Based on these and what officials have told few days ago we have to expect a lot of changes.
What we are seeing, currently, is a merely dressed power train, equipped with flight systems and approximate weight distribution + preliminary structural design.
It is strange, even the engineers working in these projects do not dare to use future tense.