ur naive thats the problem, u assume that better pr would magically cease the support against the PKK it would not, its also very unrealistic to expect better pr from nations that have been running a bad pr scheme against u for centuries.
The only way to remind them is that actions come with consequences like now, what the avg man thinks is irrelevant, it will be the task of their gov to inform them why, if they falsely inform them then they will again have to face the consequences of that lel
something the Swedes have very badly calculated in if they truly think that they can have the biggest pkk farm in europe and get away with it and as such will be vetoed til infinity. I just dont see that nation joining NATO, in fact if that nations joins we should be the ones leaving but we should be leaving anyway with the way thinks develop in europe, as the current conflict shows, a neutral status suits Turkey much better.
--
with regards to trt world, i think they are doing a good job expanding not everything needs to be western oriented, the western press itself largely serves the western audience (see ukraine conflict)
BTW this is goats milk, i couldn't get that account to work again so i made this account and i think you will agree from my prior content i'm not naïve at all. This is what i think will happen, america will force their membership into the alliance, Turkish veto will be worthless. Swedes will not cease support for PKK just like the americans don't. However erdogan barking about it allowed the media to manipulate his statements to push the same tired narrative of Turks slughtering innocent Kurds.
But to think this way you have to understand the past, understand the enemy and have foresight to see the future variables from actions taken today.
remember getting minorities to revolt against the Turks has been exceptionally easy, its happened so many times in the past. What i see is the Turks don't learn and adapt from it, they keep falling into the same tired traps over and over again.
If erdogan had any brains, before closing the straights he would have either got concessions from NATO over Syria or Russia. If Russia pulls away and lets Turkey clean the area out, the straights stay open, if the Americans pull back their support then the straights close. But he didn't use that card to the advantage of Turkey at all.
As for TRT world its failing in the west because its to Islamist focussed. The west in general don't like Muslims, meanwhile we got a western news outlet that keeps pushing it, which only cements the western prejudice of Turks. I got no issues with TRT playing the Muslim card in the Muslim world, but in the western world its causing us to look bad.
Then TRT does things like "when the white man arrived" exposing the global crimes of europeans, which makes whites hate Turks and Muslims even more. Most media outlets are no more then propaganda pieces to push geopolitical interests of said nation, TRT world harms Turkish geopolitical interests.
To go back to the "veto" the Turkish veto will be worthless, just like NATO left Turkey alone against Russia in multiple theatres. Article 5 will never be used to protect Turkey even if Russia directly invaded Turkey tomorrow, the media would portray it as a Turkish issue only. Who forgets how hostile the western world was towards Turkey when we downed a Russian jet, most cowardly europeans rushed to Putins side and denounced Turkey.
So just like i believe article 5 in the case of if Turkey is attacked is worthless, the Turkish veto will also be worthless. We got to play the game better, we got to learn from the past.
