Latest Thread
He said this after an opposition pm's question on why won't Turkey push for F-35s instead of F-16s for approving Sweden's NATO bid. This has to be theater right?
The problem with the F-35 is that from the get go they wanted a Jack-of-all-trades fighter and are expecting too much of it which was a mistake in the first place.I still cant comprehend why you ppl cant realise that the F35 is a failed project?
How many nations have grounded their entire F35 fleets numerous times due to malfunctions and cost difficulties? Nations like South Korea and USA have already grounded their F35s fleets multiple times due to such issues.
South Korea among multiple nations complained b4 on how the F35 operational expenses are through the roof and the repair prices due to constant malfunctioning are just staggering particularly due to the fact that all critical tech in the F35 must be repaired in the US; thus, the US charges a massive premium. With the F35 being a tech beast, even the smallest malfunction may force its buyer to pay that premium for the US to fix
A weapon doesnt only need to be stealthy to be effective for gods sake! A weapon needs to be effecient, effective, mobile, easy to use, easy to obtain, and universally usable to be extremely effective! With the F35, many such factors havent yet been answered with nations binge buying the product due to US propaganda like fools. This is why weapons like the F16 and AK-47 rifle are still being used to date in huge quantities
Just imagine if Turkey possesses a squadron of F35 jets rn, how many times will Turkey beg for the US to repair the jets after each sortie? And how much will the US get in return (aside from money)? F35s would have sucked the Turkish Air Force budget dry just to be operational and still wouldnt be the playmaker in any sort of warfare whatsoever
I still cant comprehend why you ppl cant realise that the F35 is a failed project?
How many nations have grounded their entire F35 fleets numerous times due to malfunctions and cost difficulties? Nations like South Korea and USA have already grounded their F35s fleets multiple times due to such issues.
South Korea among multiple nations complained b4 on how the F35 operational expenses are through the roof and the repair prices due to constant malfunctioning are just staggering particularly due to the fact that all critical tech in the F35 must be repaired in the US; thus, the US charges a massive premium. With the F35 being a tech beast, even the smallest malfunction may force its buyer to pay that premium for the US to fix
A weapon doesnt only need to be stealthy to be effective for gods sake! A weapon needs to be effecient, effective, mobile, easy to use, easy to obtain, and universally usable to be extremely effective! With the F35, many such factors havent yet been answered with nations binge buying the product due to US propaganda like fools. This is why weapons like the F16 and AK-47 rifle are still being used to date in huge quantities
Just imagine if Turkey possesses a squadron of F35 jets rn, how many times will Turkey beg for the US to repair the jets after each sortie? And how much will the US get in return (aside from money)? F35s would have sucked the Turkish Air Force budget dry just to be operational and still wouldnt be the playmaker in any sort of warfare whatsoever
This has been the narrative in you know which media for a while.
We cant have these toys, so instead of dealing with our own failures we find something else to shift blame.
Whether thats Turkish football and always blaming the referee or politics.
What we really need as a country is a change in mentality and accountability.
F35 is a failed project and a (non)-flying maintenance cash-cow. Its maybe the biggest cash cow of the US MIC.
There are falling more F35 out the sky than birds around a windmill.
That the foreign minister still hasn't made a statement over the fact that a deal negotiates by Erdogan has fallen through and Saudia Arabia wants 40 million dollars for the breach of contractWhat exactly is becoming Foreign Policy issue?
I've learnt quite a bit about supply lines and geographical factoids from his two books, but I cannot imagine how a well-read and smart person would do the kind of overarching generic speculations that he does (probably trying to appeal to a certain, simple-minded, audience).