And it resulted in bad blood between Trump and Pompeo and Pentagon didn't execute Trumps order.I agree it's bad, but Pompeo was secretary of state when Trump gave the order for Syria withdrawal. It's not end all be all.
Latest Thread
And it resulted in bad blood between Trump and Pompeo and Pentagon didn't execute Trumps order.I agree it's bad, but Pompeo was secretary of state when Trump gave the order for Syria withdrawal. It's not end all be all.
Whatever I said here is with an assumption of semi-rational actors; people Trump is appointing right now are mostly people blind with Zionist rage (or at least pretending to be for monetary reasons). So all those apprehensions and calculations might be null and void if only thing you want is to do the bidding of the craziest factions in Israel.sounds quite far-fetched anyway. I've been delving into the other point they bring up about this whole Ocalan thing, i.e. this all being about a war in Iran. The more I read realist voices from inside Iran and Israel and also since perusing a couple of books on the negotiations between westerners and Iran, it's becoming ever clearer that U.S. has only used the spectre of war for intimidation without any serious intent, at least since 2007 when the NIE leak was interpreted by Bush admin war hawks as a coup against plans to invade Iran. I think the pentagon assessment is that an invasion of Iran is not feasible and hitting their nuclear facilities by Israel (excluding Natanz which they can't destroy with their own bunker busters and need U.S. bombers and GBU-57) will only delay their nukes and make them more belligerent so that's not feasible either. Only remaining military option is U.S. bombers with the help of Israel hitting their nuclear facilities but that still translates to an all-out war down the line, so that's out of the picture as well. They seem to be helpless in the face of a nuclear Iran, as the sanctions only led to the acceleration of their program and their defiance. Their only hope remains unrest and civil war via "maximum pressure" which means crippling sanctions and this is the route they will resort to I think this time as well, as they have done before in 2009, 2019, 2022.
What I was trying to say is that the "analysis" that U.S. is trying to invade Iran which many of our own "analysts" have also been parroting seems to me now to be infantile and oblivious to the myriad of public information available in the books by Bill Burns, Jay Solomon, Ronen Bergman, Yousef Azizi, Ali Alizadeh, etc. which shows that none of the U.S. threats with regards to a military option on Iran have been credible since Iran passed the thresholds which they did in their nuclear program since about 2005-2007.
For me to make that mistake is one thing, but those whose job is to be political analyzers to make this mistake goes to show the horrendous level of analysis by our political commentators and politicians. I wasted almost the whole of past three days, reading up on this stuff. Hours which could have been saved if we had literate people in this country.
this isn't aimed at anyone in particular, but I would suggest that we don't start blaming "outside forces" once again.
the country is full of 10+ million foreigners - pkkistan project is marching forward - new peace process is coming up
who's responsible for all of this? "oh bu-bu-but its America and I-I-sreal" shut the f up, tell me again who's been ruling the country for 20 years?
If you treat foreign policy as a tool for gaining voters and holding your grip on power this is the result. We're becoming a second Iran, and that isn't a good thing.
Elections need to hurry up.
Erdogan invites Prof Yunus to visit Turkey, assures full support to build a prosperous Bangladesh
View attachment 71992
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has invited Chief Adviser Prof Muhammad Yunus to visit Turkey and assured Bangladesh of all possible help in its journey to carry out deep reforms and build a prosperous country.
![]()
Erdogan invites Prof Yunus to visit Turkey, assures full support to build a prosperous Bangladesh
Chief adviser meets global leaders at climate summitwww.tbsnews.net
Well, that's beside the point. Domestic mismanagement is no excuse for international disengagements. Engaged foreign policy breeds sophistication among the politicians of a country and creates a tradition of astute realpolitik analysis and veteran intelligence people. These are aspects which all countries need to foster, big and small.Good, but I think that he should have started building a prosperous future for his own country first before trying to do it for the others. Because with everything that is happening in Turkiye right now, the future doesn’t look that bright.
This might be a surprise but in this regard I align with the likes of Ahmet Davutoglu () more than you might glean from my postings on this forum.
Don't fret I'm not with him on the specifics, just that engaging far and wide in the middle-east is prudent policy; retreating into your shell cannot sustain an ambitious outlook in terms of energy policy, maritime trade and a military and diplomatic forward base for opening up markets.
this isn't aimed at anyone in particular, but I would suggest that we don't start blaming "outside forces" once again.
the country is full of 10+ million foreigners - pkkistan project is marching forward - new peace process is coming up
who's responsible for all of this? "oh bu-bu-but its America and I-I-sreal" shut the f up, tell me again who's been ruling the country for 20 years?
If you treat foreign policy as a tool for gaining voters and holding your grip on power this is the result. We're becoming a second Iran, and that isn't a good thing.
Elections need to hurry up.
I honestly dont know what the endgame here is. We don't gain anything about being the loudest opponent of Israel. We just lose.