The heads of the largest European countries were invited to London to discuss the defense of Europe from possible attacks by Russia without NATO, or rather, without the United States. Turkey was invited because Europe is not very capable of defending itself without it. This is the reality.Summit of NATO members in EU held by the presidents. Greece was missing. Why?
What can Greece offer in this regard? Obviously, much less than Turkey.
In the coming days, Macron will again gather the leaders of European countries, and then the chiefs of the general staff of the European armies.
It seems to me that Macron will most likely invite the Greeks, but will not invite Turkey for a well-known reason.
Turkey does not accept French leadership in Europe. Turkey's position is closer to Great Britain than to Paris.
In my opinion, even if it is invited, Ankara may refuse to send the chief of the general staff to Paris.
It is unlikely that Erdogan has forgotten the reaction (or rather the lack of reaction) of NATO countries 5 years ago in Syria, when 33 Turkish soldiers were killed under Russian air strikes.
« The US president’s actions are “a wake-up call for us to unite and design our own centre of gravity”, Fidan told the Financial Times, adding that Turkey would want to be part of any new European security architecture if Nato unravels»

The ex-spymaster shaping Turkey’s rise
Foreign minister Hakan Fidan says in rare interview that Ankara would join post-Nato European security pact
Last edited: