Latest Thread
Selling anything to us that we can use to create good things is...Selling f404 class engines for a LCA equivalent of hardly 4.5 gen may not be an issue for the US..
Hürjet flying with Turkish Stars
Nope, most probably just a flyby. This is not even Hürjet's first formation flight with Stars. First was in 2024.Would it be safe to assume that Hürjet has done the same acrobatics ?
Turkish Aerospace is additionally examining alternative engine configurations for future HÜRJET variants. Demiroğlu referred to the GE Aerospace F404 and F414 as examples of engines belonging to the same general family but offering different thrust levels. He explained that HÜRJET could be redesigned around a different engine if a future customer requirement and sufficient commercial demand justified the additional development work.TUSAŞ General Manager Mehmet Demiroğlu:
“HÜRJET is going very well right now.
Our 2 prototypes have nearly reached 500 flight hours.
4 more prototypes are coming, we'll see flights this year.
Likewise, we're working on the “Light Attack” and “Naval Forces -again single-engine-” configurations.”
So,why didnt they do that already?I think TUSAS will switch to F414-GE-400 for Hürjet-N and maybe LCA. F414 has ~%18 more dry and ~%24 more wet thrust compared to its predecessor. Hürjet-N and LCA with F414, MURAD radar, MUM-T capability and long-range air-to-air missiles like Gökbora, can beat any existing 4th gen aircraft without those capabilities.
Trainer is the baseline version and has priority. It is the usual development cycle Trainer---->LCA---->Naval. Naval version will probably be available post 2030.So,why didnt they do that already?
Is it not availlable yet?
In addition to @TheInsider ’s post :So,why didnt they do that already?
Is it not availlable yet?
For this reason, the GE F-414 engine is simply too expensive for a Trainer.So,why didnt they do that already?
Is it not availlable yet?
Exactly, it is YOUR opinion.As a Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) powered by GE F-414 engines, the Hürjet would operate in similar roles to the Gripen E/F and, in the long term, render the F-16 obsolete. This is because it would cover 60–70% of an F-16’s mission profile; the remaining 30–40% of missions would then be handled by the Anka 3 and the Kizilelma. If this Hürjet II were also flown in MUM-T mode with these engines, even the Rafale and the F-16 would face major problems. With significantly lower running costs.
The TAI KAAN would then serve solely for air superiority and deterrence, working alongside the Anka 3 and the Kizilelma to neutralise the F-35/35I.
But that’s just my opinion on the matter.