Latest Thread
You mean exercise?
Yeah most of visit to India are for excerciseYou mean exercise?
@Nilgiri
@Nilgiri
How does vishakapatnam compare to
Pakistan’s New Type 054 A/P Frigate Started Sea Trials In China?
Add to that vizag has plenty space for 24 vlsrsam of 40 km range , that's about 32+24=56 vls for air defence and 16 brahmos ashm , if in future they add 8 nirbhay ,that will take it to 80 vls ship , almost best in classWell you are comparing a destroyer and frigate here....
The terminology blurs somewhat in some navies (esp in NATO) these days....
....but in this case we are still talking about a destroyer thats twice the ship the frigate is.....literally.
Heavyweight boxer versus middle weight my friend. Diff weight classes.
Past that, there is lot of qualitative edge (MF STAR + Barak for example) in kolkata and vizag class compared to any navy in IOR....be it frigate or destroyer.
Add to that vizag has plenty space for 24 vlsrsam of 40 km range , that's about 32+24=56 vls for air defence and 16 brahmos ashm , if in future they add 8 nirbhay ,that will take it to 80 vls ship , almost best in class
I believe the right comparison would be PLAAN's Type 55 vs IN's Visakhapatnam Class both being destroyer though Type 55 is relatively larger at 12-13k tons displacement vs Visakhapatnam's 7.5-8.2k tons. The type 54-A frigate is significantly smaller at 4k tons and half the capability in terms of armament while PN had to entirely rely on chinese weapons. The Shivalik class frigates can be compared to type 54 though the former is fairly larger at 6k tons with better armament@Nilgiri
How does vishakapatnam compare to
Pakistan’s New Type 054 A/P Frigate Started Sea Trials In China?
In terms of VLS, Type 55 has 112 VLS vs Visakhapatnam's projected 80 which is in line with Zumwalt class though Zumwalt is relatively larger at 15k tonsAdd to that vizag has plenty space for 24 vlsrsam of 40 km range , that's about 32+24=56 vls for air defence and 16 brahmos ashm , if in future they add 8 nirbhay ,that will take it to 80 vls ship , almost best in class
I believe the right comparison would be PLAAN's Type 55 vs IN's Visakhapatnam Class both being destroyer though Type 55 is relatively larger at 12-13k tons displacement vs Visakhapatnam's 7.5-8.2k tons.
for what tradeoff ??? increase RoF ?Regarding BHEL SRGM....there is visual confirmation now it has replaced A-190E on some of the Talwar class:
View attachment 35398
INS trishul earlier for comparison:
@Anmdt @Gessler @Bilal Khan(Quwa) @AlphaMike @Test7 et al.
for what tradeoff ??? increase RoF ?
This happens, commercial shipyards never care about whose ships is parked (docked) on where as long as it fits and respects to the docking-floating schedule.I was (earlier) chatting with @T-123456 about our shipyard capacity being a real problem for our naval expansion efforts.
@Anmdt what are your thoughts on packing ships this closely (due to this limited capacity we are stuck with till IN economy + investment really grows to larger size)..... it is safe with enough safety protocols?
This happens, commercial shipyards never care about whose ships is parked (docked) on where as long as it fits and respects to the docking-floating schedule.
Is it risky? Not actually, does it good look to eye to dock a rusty barge on next of a pretty warship? No.
Especially thinking that barge is definitely going through repairs, they should procure some floating docks to handle warships more appropriately.