Can't wait to have AVLB, ARV, SPG, and TD variant of this tank.There may still be more improvement and change in the future.
Nice. The new design is based from user input (Indonesian Army).Looking good...
View attachment 28094
looks better, but i doubt its because input from our side, since first prototype harimau, the engineer who design it claim his design came from TNI AD inputs, CMIIWNice. The new design is based from user input (Indonesian Army).
after the prototype test, TNI-AD can put more input.looks better, but i doubt its because input from our side, since first prototype harimau, the engineer who design it claim his design came from TNI AD inputs, CMIIW
for me, that camera for driver should have been on the right side.Looking good...
View attachment 28094
This is actually not the exception to the rule. It is the rule and I'm actually glad that no one dare to push the flawed design into full production.Just like i had said before, there is some flaw in the design and the end user request some modification....in which Will delayed the production timeline
this looks better...Looking good...
View attachment 28094
Didn't the one who designed it were Pindad and FNSS ?so the end user basically submit their requirement (which is flawed) and then (luckily) come to realization that their requirement is shyte and request for a revision which (hopefully) will rectify the flaw for good.
why it's just another day in this great republic of ours then wkwkwkwk
No clue, but hi chance the design above implemented in Pi dad Production.Didn't the one who designed it were Pindad and FNSS ?
The latest one ? Wonder why they didnt design it like cv90 ifv front hullNice. The new design is based from user input (Indonesian Army).
Meh only 18, hopefully MoD could order moreExpect improvement for the next batch
Because CV90 has a lot more space in front (for engine). Not visible in Harimau.The latest one ? Wonder why they didnt design it like cv90 ifv front hull
I was actually referring to the prototype tests. The input came after the tests.looks better, but i doubt its because input from our side, since first prototype harimau, the engineer who design it claim his design came from TNI AD inputs, CMIIW
What do you mean?so the end user basically submit their requirement (which is flawed)
Product improvement is quite normal.and then (luckily) come to realization that their requirement is shyte and request for a revision which (hopefully) will rectify the flaw for good.