Lmao, someone is upset
Hmmm, for ASW prefer FREMM, but AAW Thaon with their latest radar.How is it guys?
Is it better for us to switch to Thaon di Revel or stick with Fremm?
Thaon's AAW radars are better than Italian fremm ?Hmmm, for ASW prefer FREMM, but AAW Thaon with their latest radar.
Dunno about the spesific data, but ofc the 4 fixed panel (kronos dual band) has the better performance than 1 side rotated (kronos naval), even the Trieste use the same type as Thaon.Thaon's AAW radars are better than Italian fremm ?
Comparison between GP Bergamini vs Light config PPADunno about the spesific data, but ofc the 4 fixed panel (kronos dual band) has the better performance than 1 side rotated (kronos naval), even the Trieste use the same type as Thaon.
Nothing come out from your linkComparison between ASW Bergamini vs PPA
UpdatedNothing come out from your link
PPA with mk41 wkwkThe most important thing now is its SAM?
Please Sam oji-san, do your magic again...
the next gen FREMM Bergamini will be upgraded with Kronos dual band.Imo for open sea operation FREMM >> PPA, it's almost the same length between the two but FREMM is 3 meters wider.
As for radar, FREMM could be modified to be fitted with fixed radar. American FREMM (Constellation FFG) uses fixed radar.
The Navy and Fincantieri are studying a new configuration of the FREMM type frigate. It is a FREMM 2.0 in all respects, which incorporates a series of innovations, starting with the superstructure that houses the fixed-face Dual Band Radar (already adopted on PPAs). The FREMM 2.0 could be acquired by the Navy itself which, as is known, has long expressed the need to equip itself with a further number of new FREMMs: from 2 to 6 units (depending on the available budget).