E
A reminder for Westerners who are too young to know how the game is played:
Live Conflict Israel-Palestine War|Regional Escalations
- Thread starter Kartal1
- Start date
Brace Yourself
Contributor
- Messages
- 599
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
You got messed up between Jew and Zion. Zionists are the Problem not Jews.
Brace Yourself
Contributor
- Messages
- 599
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Thread 'Coincidence or Staged: SAMS and GIS warned before Attack, repeatedly ignored by the USA and Israeli Govt' https://defencehub.live/threads/coi...ly-ignored-by-the-usa-and-israeli-govt.18517/
School of Advanced Military Studies (US Army) says that Mossad has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.
Don't be so confident about them. If they attack, Tureky will never find out.
E
Ryder
Experienced member
- Messages
- 11,418
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Brace Yourself
Contributor
- Messages
- 599
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
I agree. First we have to stablish who are civil.
Children are out of question!
Here is my Debate -
Trespass in English law is an area of tort law broadly divided into three groups: trespass to the person(1), trespass to goods(2), and trespass to land(3)
.
(I) Trespass to the person comes in three variants: assault, which is -
"to act in such a way that the claimant believes he is about to be attacked";[1]battery,
"the intentional and direct application of force to another person";[2]
and false imprisonment, "depriving the claimant of freedom of movement, without a lawful justification for doing so".[3]
All three require that the act be a direct and intentional act, with indirect or unintentional acts falling under the tort of negligence.
(ll) Trespass to goods is defined as "wrongful physical interference with goods that are in the possession of another",[5] and is covered not only by the common law, but also by the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
(lll) Trespass to land involves the "unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another";[6] it is both a tort and, in certain circumstances, a crime under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
Trespass in English law - Wikipedia
Israeli Settlers have broken All Three groups of Criminal Tresspassung Law.
"A large number of settlers are armed and settlers have sometimes attacked Palestinians and destroyed Palestinian houses and other property. However, settlers as such are civilians, unless they are serving in the Israeli armed forces."
- Amnesty International
Is an unarmed settler a civilian? Even if he belongs to a self-defence militia of his settlement? Does he forfeit the protection offered by IHL, because the settlements are illegal under international law (GC IV, Art. 49(6); CIHL, Rule 130)? Does that violation justify violations of IHL committed against the settlers? (P I, Art. 50; CIHL, Rules 1, 5-6)
Amnesty International is saying Unarmed Settlers are Civilian. But I have shown that UNINTENTIONAL Tresspassing goes under Civil Law But INTENTIONAL Tresspassing is Criminal Offence and Further doing these acts to the Inhabitantns(Owner of the Land) -
1. Act of violence
2. Forcing inhabitants
3. False imprisonment
ensure that Israeli Settlers are no Longer Civilian. Now it's Falling under Criminal Offence (Tresspassing).
So, every Settler in Israel are not Civilian(excluding Children) whether it is Men or Women. They have willingly moved there knowing that it's not their land and keep pushing Palestinians forcefully to move from their Birthland.
About Half of Israeli citizen has completed millitary training under IDF. There is 21 percent Arab israeli and 14 percent Heredi Jews who are exempted from millitery training.
Is he also a Civilian? How so?
He has broken every possible Criminal offence under Criiminal Tresspassing Law.
Ryder
Experienced member
- Messages
- 11,418
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
I agree. First we have to stablish who are civil.
Children are out of question!
Here is my Debate -
Trespass in English law is an area of tort law broadly divided into three groups: trespass to the person(1), trespass to goods(2), and trespass to land(3)
.
(I) Trespass to the person comes in three variants: assault, which is -
"to act in such a way that the claimant believes he is about to be attacked";[1]battery,
"the intentional and direct application of force to another person";[2]
and false imprisonment, "depriving the claimant of freedom of movement, without a lawful justification for doing so".[3]
All three require that the act be a direct and intentional act, with indirect or unintentional acts falling under the tort of negligence.
(ll) Trespass to goods is defined as "wrongful physical interference with goods that are in the possession of another",[5] and is covered not only by the common law, but also by the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
(lll) Trespass to land involves the "unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another";[6] it is both a tort and, in certain circumstances, a crime under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
Trespass in English law - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Israeli Settlers have broken All Three groups of Criminal Tresspassung Law.
"A large number of settlers are armed and settlers have sometimes attacked Palestinians and destroyed Palestinian houses and other property. However, settlers as such are civilians, unless they are serving in the Israeli armed forces."
- Amnesty International
Is an unarmed settler a civilian? Even if he belongs to a self-defence militia of his settlement? Does he forfeit the protection offered by IHL, because the settlements are illegal under international law (GC IV, Art. 49(6); CIHL, Rule 130)? Does that violation justify violations of IHL committed against the settlers? (P I, Art. 50; CIHL, Rules 1, 5-6)
Amnesty International is saying Unarmed Settlers are Civilian. But I have shown that UNINTENTIONAL Tresspassing goes under Civil Law But INTENTIONAL Tresspassing is Criminal Offence and Further doing these acts to the Inhabitantns(Owner of the Land) -
1. Act of violence
2. Forcing inhabitants
3. False imprisonment
ensure that Israeli Settlers are no Longer Civilian. Now it's Falling under Criminal Offence (Tresspassing).
So, every Settler in Israel are not Civilian(excluding Children) whether it is Men or Women. They have willingly moved there knowing that it's not their land and keep pushing Plestinians forcefully to move from their Birthland.
About Half of Israeli citizen has completed millitary training under IDF. There is 21 percent Arab israeli and 14 percent Heredi Jews who are exempted from millitery training.
Is he also a Civilian? How so?
He has broken every possible Criminal offence under Criiminal Tresspassing Law.
Settlers should be dealt with the same way Native Americans dealt with European Settlers.
- Messages
- 2,871
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Israel's national security center: All Israeli citizens to leave Turkiye immediately
www.timesofisrael.com
Israel tells its citizens to leave Turkey immediately amid fears of reprisal attacks
* * *
www.timesofisrael.com
Brace Yourself
Contributor
- Messages
- 599
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
But amnestly imternational is covering their dirty colonial behaviour.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 828
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
I condemn the hospital attack, along with all the indiscriminate bombing of civilians. Israel is acting in a similar way to Russia. The way they lie in order to deny their war crimes is also very Russian-like.
- Messages
- 4,193
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
I don’t see any craters or possible bomb marks. Also not clear how hundreds of people fit into this backyard.
more and more it looks like this was possibly a rocket intercepted or got broken apart in air and rained rocket fuel on the ground to me.
more and more it looks like this was possibly a rocket intercepted or got broken apart in air and rained rocket fuel on the ground to me.
- Messages
- 5,139
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Israeli officials did a bad job by posting fake videos and deleting tweets. They definitely damaged their credibility like that.
However, I agree. It looks more like PIJ Rocket fell apart on the Hospital.
However, I agree. It looks more like PIJ Rocket fell apart on the Hospital.
- Messages
- 555
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
So after seeing that photos it looks like it was Palestinians who were lying about that hundreds of deads in hospital.
Palestinian officials did a REALLY bad job and it damaged their credibility (well, they had close to zero but it fell even more)
Palestinian officials did a REALLY bad job and it damaged their credibility (well, they had close to zero but it fell even more)
- Messages
- 5,139
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
We don't have the confirmation about the numbers of casualties yet.
There are only Hamas officials in Gaza.
- Messages
- 97
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
As you all know, I hate Israel more than anyone else. But this attack by Hamas was useless and unnecessary. I don't know if they thought about the consequences of their actions or not
E
It was necessary - to give Israel an excuse to occupy more of Gaza. If you ignore their words and only look at their actions, Hamas has only ever worked toward Israel's interests. That's why things like this happen:
Liberman: Netanyahu sent Mossad head, general to Qatar, ‘begged’ it to pay Hamas
Yisrael Beytenu party leader says the pair were sent by PM two weeks ago to convince Doha not to end its money transfers to the Gaza-based terror group
Mossad chief Yossi Cohen and the top officer of the Israel Defense Forces in charge of Gaza, Herzi Halevi, visited Qatar earlier this month on the instructions of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to plead with its leaders to continue their periodical payments to Hamas, Yisrael Beytenu party chief Avigdor Liberman claimed Saturday night.
Speaking to Channel 12 news, Liberman censured Netanyahu for having “begged” the Qataris to continue supporting the Gaza-based terror group.
“On Wednesday two weeks ago the head of Mossad… and the head of [IDF] Southern Command visit Qatar on an errand from Netanyahu, and they simply beg the Qataris to keep sending money to Hamas after March 30. The Qataris have said they will stop sending money on March 30,” Liberman said.
“Both Egypt and Qatar are angry with Hamas and planned to cut ties with them. Suddenly Netanyahu appears as the defender of Hamas, as though it was an environmental organization. This is a policy of submission to terror,” he said, adding that Israel was paying Hamas “protection money” to maintain the calm.
It was necessary - to give Israel an excuse to occupy more of Gaza. If you ignore their words and only look at their actions, Hamas has only ever worked toward Israel's interests. That's why things like this happen:
Liberman: Netanyahu sent Mossad head, general to Qatar, ‘begged’ it to pay Hamas
Yisrael Beytenu party leader says the pair were sent by PM two weeks ago to convince Doha not to end its money transfers to the Gaza-based terror group
Mossad chief Yossi Cohen and the top officer of the Israel Defense Forces in charge of Gaza, Herzi Halevi, visited Qatar earlier this month on the instructions of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to plead with its leaders to continue their periodical payments to Hamas, Yisrael Beytenu party chief Avigdor Liberman claimed Saturday night.
Speaking to Channel 12 news, Liberman censured Netanyahu for having “begged” the Qataris to continue supporting the Gaza-based terror group.
“On Wednesday two weeks ago the head of Mossad… and the head of [IDF] Southern Command visit Qatar on an errand from Netanyahu, and they simply beg the Qataris to keep sending money to Hamas after March 30. The Qataris have said they will stop sending money on March 30,” Liberman said.
“Both Egypt and Qatar are angry with Hamas and planned to cut ties with them. Suddenly Netanyahu appears as the defender of Hamas, as though it was an environmental organization. This is a policy of submission to terror,” he said, adding that Israel was paying Hamas “protection money” to maintain the calm.
So why do we host their headquarters ? Favour for Israel ?
Tornadoss
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,556
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Is the only major damage on parking lot or was there any damage on the hospital building?
