I agree. First we have to stablish who are civil.
Children are out of question!
Here is my Debate -
Trespass in English law is an area of tort law broadly divided into three groups:
trespass to the person(1),
trespass to goods(2), and
trespass to land(3)
.
(I) Trespass to the person comes in three variants: assault, which is -
"
to act in such a way that the claimant believes he is about to be attacked";[1]battery,
"the intentional and direct application of force to another person";[2]
and false imprisonment, "depriving the claimant of freedom of movement, without a lawful justification for doing so".[3]
All three require that the act be a direct and intentional act, with indirect or unintentional acts falling under the tort of negligence.
(ll) Trespass to goods is defined as
"wrongful physical interference with goods that are in the possession of another",[5] and is covered not only by the common law, but also by the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
(lll) Trespass to land involves the
"unjustifiable interference with land which is in the immediate and exclusive possession of another";[6] it is both a tort and, in certain circumstances,
a crime under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Israeli Settlers have broken All Three groups of Criminal Tresspassung Law.
"A large number of settlers are armed and settlers have sometimes attacked Palestinians and destroyed Palestinian houses and other property. However, settlers as such are civilians, unless they are serving in the Israeli armed forces."
- Amnesty International
Is an unarmed settler a civilian? Even if he belongs to a self-defence militia of his settlement? Does he forfeit the protection offered by IHL, because the settlements are illegal under international law (GC IV, Art. 49(6); CIHL, Rule 130)? Does that violation justify violations of IHL committed against the settlers? (P I, Art. 50; CIHL, Rules 1, 5-6)
casebook.icrc.org
Amnesty International is saying Unarmed Settlers are Civilian. But I have shown that
UNINTENTIONAL Tresspassing goes under
Civil Law But
INTENTIONAL Tresspassing is Criminal Offence and Further doing these acts to the Inhabitantns(Owner of the Land) -
1. Act of violence
2. Forcing inhabitants
3. False imprisonment
ensure that
Israeli Settlers are no Longer
Civilian. Now it's Falling under
Criminal Offence (Tresspassing).
So,
every Settler in Israel are not Civilian(excluding Children) whether it is Men or Women.
They have willingly moved there knowing that it's
not their land and keep pushing Plestinians forcefully to move from their Birthland.
About Half of Israeli citizen has completed millitary training under IDF. There is 21 percent Arab israeli and 14 percent Heredi Jews who are exempted from millitery training.
Is he also a Civilian? How so?
He has broken every possible Criminal offence under Criiminal Tresspassing Law.