Breaking News Israel strikes Doha

[IC3M@N FX]

No, Article 5 does not say that an attack on one is an attack on all with military support.
But the support you give as a NATO partner is your business, be it in the form of political support, economic or goods support, or military support. That's why, for example, we hardly ever support the Baltic states with troops or take part in manoeuvres in the northern countries. It is not our conflict with Russia.

If Russia were to attack, we would and must have to help, but the nature of that help would be up to us.
That's why NATO protection is a joke; after all, it doesn't force anyone to provide military assistance.

 

[Yasar_TR]

No, Article 5 does not say that an attack on one is an attack on all with military support.
But the support you give as a NATO partner is your business, be it in the form of political support, economic or goods support, or military support. That's why, for example, we hardly ever support the Baltic states with troops or take part in manoeuvres in the northern countries. It is not our conflict with Russia.

If Russia were to attack, we would and must have to help, but the nature of that help would be up to us.
That's why NATO protection is a joke; after all, it doesn't force anyone to provide military assistance.

What do you mean NO?

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

Article 5

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.”

If any country should refrain from helping us then they will know that they will be treated the same should they be attacked.

Help can be in any form deemed necessary by the individual country. But if they are reluctant or refraining from help then they will be treated the same should they be in same position one day.

It is also important that Turkiye has one of the most capable and active armed forces of the organisation that can fight most efficiently. If you don’t help Turkiye then don’t expect help when Russia invades your country.

Also it is important that the member countries won’t be siding with Israel.

 

[IC3M@N FX]

But that's what it comes down to, the support is a must but the type of help is not.

That's why I say Article 5 is a joke, it doesn't compel military assistance.

Article 5 does not automatically oblige NATO members to provide military support.

The key wording is:

“…such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force…”

Why this wording matters​

• “such action as it deems necessary” → each country decides for itself what kind of assistance to provide.
• “including the use of armed force” → military action is only one possible option, not an obligation.

So, the treaty requires action, but it does not prescribe that action must be military.


This means:

• Every member must provide assistance in some form.
• But each state decides what kind of assistance it considers necessary.
• That assistance may include armed force, but it could also be political, logistical, intelligence, financial, or other types of support.

The essence of Article 5 is political and security solidarity: no NATO member will be left to face aggression alone.
In practice, assistance often involves a combination of military, intelligence, and political measures.

 

[TR_123456]

But that's what it comes down to, the support is a must but the type of help is not.

That's why I say Article 5 is a joke, it doesn't compel military assistance.

Article 5 does not automatically oblige NATO members to provide military support.

The key wording is:

Why this wording matters​

• “such action as it deems necessary” → each country decides for itself what kind of assistance to provide.
• “including the use of armed force” → military action is only one possible option, not an obligation.

So, the treaty requires action, but it does not prescribe that action must be military.


This means:

• Every member must provide assistance in some form.
• But each state decides what kind of assistance it considers necessary.
• That assistance may include armed force, but it could also be political, logistical, intelligence, financial, or other types of support.

The essence of Article 5 is political and security solidarity: no NATO member will be left to face aggression alone.
In practice, assistance often involves a combination of military, intelligence, and political measures.

In this case the wording doesnt matter,the reaction matters.
We need a reason to ''end'' NATO and they will provide that reason which is why we need to invoke article 5.
Not that we need their help but to show their true faces their double standards.
Lets be honest,without Türkiye NATO is just a confirmed white christian racist club without any real power(those days are over)

 

[mehmed beg]

The word of these people ain't worth the paper, on which it is written on.
Turkey, hopefully gets 5 more years and if possible in meantime, engage Jewry in protracted war everywhere in the Middle East. Hopefully by then America will be in more trouble.
In any case , I think that it would be Greece which will instigate the trouble. Probably, as soon as they get F 35s and some other Jewery goodies.

 

[AlperTunga]

One last thing to add:

This is the most important fact.

Turkiye has the second largest army of NATO.
It means we are one of the most important parts of NATO.

If Israel were to attack Türkiye militarily in any form or shape, NATO would have to respond and help Türkiye defend herself. That includes US too. If they don’t then NATO is dead. If article 5 does not become operable then the main reason for the treaty’s purpose is gone.

So forget about Türkiye-Israel military conflict directly!!

Dear members, forget about NATO! I cannot believe that you believe NATO will help us. NATO will still stay among themselves as NATO. It won't end because they don't help us against Israel. We should be happy if they don't help Israel, but US and Greece will certainly do. Greece can become active with high probability. Our ballistic missiles may damage some of their air fields but in that case they will land in US carriers. And they will repair them fast. We won't have enough numbers (at least half will be eliminated by their ADs) to do a second or third round. This is is our problem. We are always too late and have too few. Our large land force (will you attack them with M48s or Leo 1?? and without air support??) won't mean much in a conflict with Israel. I can guarantee you if Israel attacks Hamas in Istanbul we will just protest and condemn it. Although in my dreams and when I get angry at Israel, I (wish to) think otherwise and concoct scenarios to believe in, in reality it will be different, all because of insufficient preparation and habitual procrastination.

 

[AlperTunga]

I forgot to add, Spain can send us some patriots. But by that time most damage will be inflicted.

 

[Huelague]

I think an attack on Türkiye is only a matter of time.

If this will happen, Türkiye shout starts a Great War. Purchasing nukes from Pakistan or „whom ever“, immediately.
Turkish people in Europe should also be prepared, together with their ‚allies‘.

At this time, it’s important to evacuate all Arabs from this region, because of possible nukleare strike to destroy whole Israel.

 

[Huelague]

No! NATO will not help Türkiye if Israel or any other „Western“ country attack us.

 

[Eurofighter]

Help can be in any form deemed necessary

Easy to underestimate the depth of feeling in Europe at what is going on. I think Macron for example does want to help Gaza (although the EU also needs the US for Ukraine), and supplying SAMP(T) to Turkey could be the way he does it: Every reinforcement of Turkey makes the Israelis feel less invincible; if it brings them back down to earth then they may start treating Palestinians as humans.

If Turkey is willing to buy 40 Eurofighters from the UK to help keep British production lines open, that would be genuinely appreciated and would result in some form of assistance in return (eg naval support for defensive purposes). UK is seriously worried about losing highly skilled engineers if its production lines close.

European NATO can also provide support to Turkey by increasing sanctions on Israel - which have finally reached the stage of freezing Israel out of the UK's prestigious officer training program for example (Israelis are furious and call it dishonorable/disloyalty).

Yasar_TR mentioned that the US can restrain Israel because Israel depends on US technology and intelligence. I think that is very true, but it is better to shift dependence from the US to the UK, France, European NATO, and Pakistan right now because the US continues to backfill Israeli munitions for free. With the Israeli government's extreme ideology they are almost stupid not to use munitions at the highest possible rate under this arrangement. I do not think their behaviour will reduce until the US support reduces, and for countries to be able to criticise this US support they must be less dependent on the US.

I do think Turkish air defence is not ready yet from what I read. Siper Block 1 and F-15's maximum operating altitude are similar, and at this altitude Siper Block 1's operational radius will be much-reduced => I doubt it could provide true area denial vs an F-15 in the same way as a ring of Siper Block 2. Israel also has a few standoff weapons with a range of up to 250km, beyond the range of Siper Block 1. I would have thought Turkey would be much better off once it has 13 or more Siper Block 2 batteries, with which it could encircle the area of northwestern Turkey containing Ankara and Istanbul to prevent Israeli jets getting within range to fire standoff weapons. (15 batteries could be enough to encircle Western Anatolia). Didn't Russia at one point have 56 S-400 batteries - so >13 Siper Block 2 batteries is not unrealistic, Turkey just needs to buy time to manufacture them.

Right now Turkey can outmatch Israel on land and at sea, but not in the air or in terms of nuclear arsenal. Imagine Israel struck Istanbul and Turkey retaliated successfully with a naval barrage - the extremists in charge of Israel could then destroy what is left of Hamas in Istanbul with a nuclear weapon as a "warning" against further Turkish retaliations. If Turkey then took the Golan Heights to show what it thinks of Israeli threats, Israel could fire ten more nuclear weapons at other Turkish cities as a second "warning" - there is only one way that ends even if Turks fought as tenaciously as the Japanese. That is why I would want Pakistan as involved as possible, for example if they could send HQ-9B batteries to Nakchavan, Bara Khware (Iraq), and north of Mosul - as long as Azerbaijan/Iraq agree.

 

[Iskander]

MADRID

Spain has canceled two contracts with Israeli companies worth almost €1 billion (approximately $1.18 billion) in a move followed by the prime minister's recently announced measures against Tel Aviv.

The Defense Ministry has canceled contracts with Israeli defense companies for the purchase of Silam high-mobility rocket launchers and the Spike L.R. anti-tank missile system.

Silam rocket launchers worth €700 million ($826 million) from Rheinmetall Expal Munitions and EM&E, as well as a deal to purchase 168 Spike missiles worth €287.5 million ($339 million), were given to PAP Tecnos Innovacion SA, the Spanish subsidiary of Israeli company Rafael.

Spain cancels $1.1B worth of Israeli arms deals

---------------------------------------------------------------------
I couldn't help but glance at the map and ask Google what the direct distance between Israel and Spain is.
3,500 km.
Is that really a distance for Israeli fighters and... American tanker planes (!)?! Israelis conducted military operation in Uganda 50 years ago. 4000 км!
Do you think that's unrealistic? I wouldn't say so. A few months ago, Netanyahu, in connection with the Spanish Prime Minister's statement about the massacre in Gaza, reminded him of the expulsion of Jews from Andalusia by the Spanish 500 years ago. Whether there is anything written in the Torah about this sad event - I don't know. If the Torah remembers very well the exodus of the Jews from Egypt, which took place in prehistoric times, then...
A few days ago, one of the Israeli ministers recalled Erdogan's words, spoken 6 years ago, about Jerusalem belonging to the Ottoman Empire...
True, he forgot to add that many Jewish refugees expelled from Spain found salvation in the same Ottoman Empire.

 

[mehmed beg]

MADRID

Spain has canceled two contracts with Israeli companies worth almost €1 billion (approximately $1.18 billion) in a move followed by the prime minister's recently announced measures against Tel Aviv.

The Defense Ministry has canceled contracts with Israeli defense companies for the purchase of Silam high-mobility rocket launchers and the Spike L.R. anti-tank missile system.

Silam rocket launchers worth €700 million ($826 million) from Rheinmetall Expal Munitions and EM&E, as well as a deal to purchase 168 Spike missiles worth €287.5 million ($339 million), were given to PAP Tecnos Innovacion SA, the Spanish subsidiary of Israeli company Rafael.

Spain cancels $1.1B worth of Israeli arms deals

---------------------------------------------------------------------
I couldn't help but glance at the map and ask Google what the direct distance between Israel and Spain is.
3,500 km.
Is that really a distance for Israeli fighters and... American tanker planes (!)?! The Israelis bombed... Uganda 50 years ago. 4,000 km!
Do you think that's unrealistic? I wouldn't say so. A few months ago, Netanyahu, in connection with the Spanish Prime Minister's statement about the massacre in Gaza, reminded him of the expulsion of Jews from Andalusia by the Spanish 500 years ago. Whether there is anything written in the Torah about this sad event - I don't know. If the Torah remembers very well the exodus of the Jews from Egypt, which took place in prehistoric times, then...
A few days ago, one of the Israeli ministers recalled Erdogan's words, spoken 6 years ago, about Jerusalem belonging to the Ottoman Empire...
True, he forgot to add that many Jewish refugees expelled from Spain found salvation in the same Ottoman Empire.

You see , the first act of those so called Republicans in Spain was recending the act of Jewery expulsion. Those it was at that point just a formality.
In any case, similar law is still valid in England. The Edict from 1290.
In any case, these are sold developments. Myself, if I am in the position, I would heavily invest in the real extreme right. Those people can have some effect, those pink haired f ts, have absolutely no use.

 

[BalkanTurk90]

Hey i want a sincere answer about middle east wars and Turkiye place and acts in this .
1- Does Turkiye have a military base in Qatar and agreement which has to protect Qatar if is attacked by outside ans did Turkiye Apply this agreement ?
2- Does attacks on syria bases by israel aslo hit Turkish military personel and equipment and why cant hit israel back from syria that by international law should ?
3- Same as İsrael attacks everybody which feels threatened can Turkiye aslo do it , First how abount Attacking South Cyprys Barack MX defence missiles which are a threat to Turkiye ?
4- Can Turkiye sent MİT or even bombing a other country which support or have inside his borders YPG-PKK like iraq , syria , israel, grecce ??
- Does anybody thinks about those ? Whats going on
-How can a 2nd NATO country sleeps while his national security is at threat ? Just yesterday A Zagros iranian gypsy like people in Hakkari attacked Turkish soldiers because they were listening Turkish mısic ?
-Does only economy sanctions from zionism west stops Turkiye from wipeing off those scums ?

 

[oldcpu]

Hey i want a sincere answer about middle east wars and Turkiye place and acts in this .
1- Does Turkiye have a military base in Qatar and agreement which has to protect Qatar if is attacked by outside ans did Turkiye Apply this agreement ?

Turkey and Qatar have signed several military cooperation and implementation agreements since 2007, which cover training, joint exercises, intelligence sharing, and the deployment of troops, but they do not publicly in any agreement promise to come to eithers aid if attacked. If there is such an agreement between Qatar and Turkey, for Turkey to consider an attack on Qatar, the same as an attack on Turkey, it is secret and not public.

 

[Pokemonte13]

Hey i want a sincere answer about middle east wars and Turkiye place and acts in this .
1- Does Turkiye have a military base in Qatar and agreement which has to protect Qatar if is attacked by outside ans did Turkiye Apply this agreement ?
2- Does attacks on syria bases by israel aslo hit Turkish military personel and equipment and why cant hit israel back from syria that by international law should ?
3- Same as İsrael attacks everybody which feels threatened can Turkiye aslo do it , First how abount Attacking South Cyprys Barack MX defence missiles which are a threat to Turkiye ?
4- Can Turkiye sent MİT or even bombing a other country which support or have inside his borders YPG-PKK like iraq , syria , israel, grecce ??
- Does anybody thinks about those ? Whats going on
-How can a 2nd NATO country sleeps while his national security is at threat ? Just yesterday A Zagros iranian gypsy like people in Hakkari attacked Turkish soldiers because they were listening Turkish mısic ?
-Does only economy sanctions from zionism west stops Turkiye from wipeing off those scums ?

1. That base is for training purposes mostly but also kind of a symbol to show support to its neighbors because it was built doing a period of heightened tensions between Katar and the gulf states
2. As far as we know no official turkish personal was hit like military or civilian maybe intelligence personal but thats just a far fetched guess. I don't understand the second part
3. Technically we could. We have the equipment and tactics but political and economic sanctions would follow and it wouldn't make it worth it. It would only make sense if we were going in to a fight with israel and thats not happening in the next years or so.
4. We already do but not in greece or in israel one supports the ypg symbolically(greece) the other definitely bot mostly in information and politically(Israel)
5. You play with cards you have not with the ones you wish you had. We don't have all aspects under control and have limited options so the results are not always the best but we have to make due.
6. depends which scum you mean ypg yeah pretty much thats not just israeli influence but the west itself. If they could they wouldn't even classify pkk as a terrorist organization (they know pkk and sdf are basically the same) but the political backslash from our side would be to great. In german tv they say forbidden workers party
Israel is though different it wouldn't be cakewalk like in iran but currently they are stronger than us not by allot but still enough to make a difference their airforce is bigger and more modern plus the americans. But give it 5+ years and that will probably change as our military power grows exponentially while they are stretching thin.

 

[mTT]

Hey i want a sincere answer about middle east wars and Turkiye place and acts in this .
1- Does Turkiye have a military base in Qatar and agreement which has to protect Qatar if is attacked by outside ans did Turkiye Apply this agreement ?
2- Does attacks on syria bases by israel aslo hit Turkish military personel and equipment and why cant hit israel back from syria that by international law should ?
3- Same as İsrael attacks everybody which feels threatened can Turkiye aslo do it , First how abount Attacking South Cyprys Barack MX defence missiles which are a threat to Turkiye ?
4- Can Turkiye sent MİT or even bombing a other country which support or have inside his borders YPG-PKK like iraq , syria , israel, grecce ??
- Does anybody thinks about those ? Whats going on
-How can a 2nd NATO country sleeps while his national security is at threat ? Just yesterday A Zagros iranian gypsy like people in Hakkari attacked Turkish soldiers because they were listening Turkish mısic ?
-Does only economy sanctions from zionism west stops Turkiye from wipeing off those scums ?

1-

Türk F-16’ları Katar’da: Türk-Katar Müşterek Filosu! | SavunmaSanayiST

Türk Hava Kuvvetleri ve Katar Hava Kuvvetleri’nin, Katar’daki Birleşik Müşterek Kuvvet Komutanlığı bünyesinde, Türk-Katar Müşterek Filosu kurduğu açıklandı.

www.savunmasanayist.com

2-It was denied by the Ministry of National Defense.

MSB: İsrail'in terörizmi devlet politikası haline getirdiği, barışa karşı olduğu gözler önüne serilmiştir

Milli Savunma Bakanlığı'ndan yapılan açıklamada, "(Katar'da Hamas müzakere heyetine saldırı) İsrail'in terörizmi devlet politikası haline getirdiği, çatışmadan beslendiği, barışa karşı olduğu gözler önüne serilmiştir." ifadeleri kullanıldı. - Anadolu Ajansı

www.aa.com.tr

3-
If you want to participate in European Union defense programs, you wouldn't want to attack a country that is a member of the European Union.

 

[Iskander]

Afghan Voice Agency (AVA) - International Service

At the recent summit of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Doha, Qatar, Egypt's proposed plan to form a regional defense force modeled on NATO, dubbed an "Arab NATO," to counter external threats, particularly Israel, encountered strong resistance from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and effectively failed.
Egypt proposed this plan, based on the 1950 Treaty of Mutual Defense and Economic Cooperation, to ensure the security of Arab countries by creating a rapid-response alliance. However, the main disagreement among the countries present concerned the issue of leadership: Saudi Arabia wanted to command the coalition, while Egypt, drawing on its long-standing military experience, saw itself as a more suitable candidate for this role.
Countries, including Qatar and the UAE, did not support Egypt and rejected the proposal, and ultimately it was decided to limit security matters to the Gulf Defense Council. According to him, even Iran and Turkey were tacitly excluded from the coalition.
After this defeat, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi left the Doha meeting disappointed. Egypt had hoped that the summit would at least lead to a clear stance against Israel's genocide in Gaza and its opposition to the forced displacement of Palestinians to the Sinai Peninsula, but the influence of the United States, which sought to prevent the adoption of harsh resolutions against Israel, prevented these demands from being met.
As a result, the Arab countries present preferred to pressure the United States to find a solution for a ceasefire in Gaza rather than take direct action against Israel.

Egypts plan to form an Arab NATO fails; disagreement over US leadership and influence hinders Arab defense alliance | AVA

At the recent summit of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation held in Doha, Qatar, Egypts proposed plan to form a NATO-style regional defense force under the name quot;Arab NATOquot; with the aim of confronting external threats, especially Israel, faced serious opposition...

www.avapress.com

Saddam Hossein could have united the Arab countries! But the Arabs themselves hanged him with an American rope.
Erdogan refused to allow the US to attack Iraq from Turkish territory. But the Arab countries willingly provided such an opportunity.
Arabs unwilling to submit to Saddam Hossein, an Arab, will have to endure any humiliation from... Netanyahu!
As they say, c'est la vie

 

[Merzifonlu]

Erdogan refused to allow the US to attack Iraq from Turkish territory.

NO!! On contrary, Erdoğan did everything in his power to ensure that law was passed! It was the Turkish Grand National Assembly, not Erdoğan, that denied the USA to attack Iraq from Turkish territory.

 

[Iskander]

NO!! On contrary, Erdoğan did everything in his power to ensure that law was passed! It was the Turkish Grand National Assembly, not Erdoğan, that denied the USA to attack Iraq from Turkish territory.

Under US pressure, the Grand National Assembly held several votes. And the result was always the same: rejection. Let me remind you that at that point, Erdoğan's party had a two-thirds majority (quorum) in the Grand National Assembly.

 

[Sanchez]

Let me remind you that at that point, Erdoğan's party had a two-thirds majority (quorum) in the Grand National Assembly.

And it wasn't a leader's party then like it is now. Nayers were pretty open about it while Erdogan was pushing them to accept.