Is that so? You don't think that countries will look back at what happened in Iran and conclude that the cost was greater than the benefit?The moment Iran falls, Turkey is next in line that is 100% sure.
Latest Thread
Is that so? You don't think that countries will look back at what happened in Iran and conclude that the cost was greater than the benefit?The moment Iran falls, Turkey is next in line that is 100% sure.
Per what's released, most of the Iranian navy was indeed stationary.So if the Iranian naval assets were stationary, ATACMS could have done the deed.
We saw spent HIMARS cases in Kuwait in the desert and footage of them being used in Bahrain; yes.But the TWZ article shows that US must be firing those attacks from ground in the gulf countries being hit. And not just from air.
The costs may seem insignificant compared to the colossal benefits.Is that so? You don't think that countries will look back at what happened in Iran and conclude that the cost was greater than the benefit?