• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

Holikarbon

Active member
Messages
48
Reactions
2 110
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Israel is attacking solely military targets + couple times were attacked oil storage and gas. Iran is deliberately targeting civilians.

Overall Israel dropped around 10,000 bombs on Iran. If we attacked civilians there would be over 100,000 civilian deaths in Iran by now.
It's a complete farce. You killed 175 female students on the very first day.
 

Holikarbon

Active member
Messages
48
Reactions
2 110
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Nothing to do with Israel.
Do you expect us to believe this?

It's the Patagonian Republic that bombed Iran alongside the US anyway.

Israel is the last country on earth that avoids killing civilians. In just one week, you killed over a thousand civilians in Lebanon alone.

You are liars and hypocrites, and your tactic is:

"If you tell a lie big enough and repeat it constantly, people will eventually start to believe it."

—Goebbels, Hitler's Minister of Propaganda.
 
A

Asena_great

Guest
this is a air defense saturation at first i didn't understand it too since for successful attack its better to concentrate attack on single point but its also increase the chance of interception but randomly attacking everywhere you force the other side to deploy their AD everywhere then they will be force to concentrate their AD to some points then you attack the places that dont have AD
 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
It's a complete farce. You killed 175 female students on the very first day.
It was hit by Tomahawk missile which Israel does not posses.

Israel is the last country on earth that avoids killing civilians.

Israel always makes huge effort to avoid civilian casualties. Israel is the only country who makes knock on the roof as warning for example.

In just one week, you killed over a thousand civilians in Lebanon alone.

That's false.



BTW they count non Hezbollah militias like Amal as "civilians".


You are liars and hypocrites, and your tactic is:

You lied twice today. You could not point at single my lie.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,251
Reactions
33 11,292
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
this is a air defense saturation at first i didn't understand it too since for successful attack its better to concentrate attack on single point but its also increase the chance of interception but randomly attacking everywhere you force the other side to deploy their AD everywhere then they will be force to concentrate their AD to some points then you attack the places that dont have AD

When i look at iran, its mostly been a disaster. Over the decades the things they have done regionally only harmed the region, undermined the region to the advantage of anglo-zion freemasonic aspirations.

I mean just spreading shia sectarianism across a majority sunni region is madness, no different really then the saudis spreading radical british backed wahhabism across moderate Muslim societies. That's basically anglo-american divide and conquer where they support the weaker entity to undermine the stronger one, but in reality both are destroyed in the end over it for an outside player to enter and takeover, in this case isreal/america.

I said it back when it happened that Oct 7th was basically the Palestinians inviting the vampire in. It set off a chain reaction that has brought us to a point where iran is being bombed relentlessly and the zionists now feel "comfortable" to openly start threatening Turkiye. Many people speculate that iran played a hand in this and if so what a stupid thing to do. But then the iranians allowed the zionists to pick off her foes one by one. Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis to a degree and then directly to iran herself. Only once the iranians own heads were on the chopping blocs did they decide to do anything directly. Thats a weak position to be in.

Then we got syria, all the russians and iranians had to do was understand Turkiye's security concerns in the north, neither cared for it. In the end they were both f'ked out of syria and declared losers. Had they taken Turkish security concerns into account in syria, that nation could have been standing strong to a certain degree in the face of Isreal. Now its in a place where her security will ultimatly end up resting solely on Turkiye and we will see what happens moving forward.

However saying all of this, everything is going to come down to whether the Iranians can keep launching missiles. If they can do it for months to come then at some point the zionists will have to capitulate.

But the problem is zionists cannot afford any peace because its obvious iranians will go nuclear. So i can see global zionism brining the world into complete and total chaos by trying to maintain a forever war over Iran.

Zionism is basically the most dangerous and destructive force today in terms of global peace.
 

blackjack

Experienced member
Moderator
Russia Correspondent
Russia Moderator
Messages
1,667
Reactions
10 975
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Russia
3 weeks iran operation.

>be iran, one of the most sanctioned countries in the war.
>4x F-15s (1 shot-down by enemy, 3 shot-down by a friendly)
1x F-35 (1 shot-down by enemy)
1x KC-135 (1 mid-air collision possibly brought upon by enemy fire)
1x F/A-18 (1 flopped off the deck on landing)
5x KC-135 were damaged/destroyed on the ground. 21 days in and Iran is targeting the petrol stations of the American air campaign. Not randomly but surgically. No fuel, would mean no sorties.
>1984 iran received a scud missile from Libya, reversed engineered the soviet 1950s BM to begin their own production in the 1990s, accuracy unknown so far but they are able to reach Diego Garcia.
>one US carrier made an emergency exit because the shitters were clogged. Other US carrier caught fire, cause could have been a drone, etc. US moves ships further away and urges allies instead to open up the strait of hormuz
>iran only possesses 6 satellites in orbit.

Russia comparison
>Russian navy possesses ramjets and scramjets in their arsenal.
>long range cruise missiles in their arsenal like kalibr
>possess SLBMs and scramjets for their large submarine fleet.
>Designed BMs since the 1950s most of their latest BMs have better accuracy, thrust vectoring technology to maneuver from beginning to end of their flights and EW countermeasures.
>Possesses HTVs as weapons like avangard, US failed to make the HTV-2 in similar capabilities.
>long range test flights of nuclear reactor powered cruise missiles.
>far larger missile and long range kamikaze drone production then iran.
>latest KEPs fired from tanks have 800mm to 1 meter rha steel penetration that fly near hypersonic speeds with either tungsten or depleted uranium. Russia started a large production of hazel missiles that dont leave earth's orbit for less time to track the missiles and release mach 10+ 50-100kg tungsten rods.
>canceled zmeevik missile project which is BM designs with seeker warhead to hit ships like chinas df-26 missile but instead use kinzhal where a mig-31 has a combat radius of 1000kms and the missile flies an additional 2000km+ to hit ships off coast.
>110-181 military satellites in orbit.
>levels above iran in SAM technology.

Once again this also proves that NATO will never get involved with ukraine. Iran has proven you dont have to be the best in missile technology but sometimes just good enough to survive. This is why I also urged Turkey to start mass BM production.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
547
Reactions
18 974
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
You cant criticise Israel,is that the law?
Fortunally, I can.
I mean, in the US, some Zionist supporters have been attempting to confuse anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism (racism), and try to write it in laws. Many overseas students have been subjected to censorship.
In May 2024, in the wake of a series of high-profile hearings on the rise of antisemitism on college campuses, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Antisemitism Awareness Act (“AAA”) by a strong and bipartisan 320-91 vote. However, the bill stalled in the Senate. Congressional Republicans have indicated that they would reintroduce and vote on the bill in the newly convened 119th Congress, and now that Republicans have majorities and control of both chambers, it is widely expected that the AAA will pass sometime in 2025.

The AAA directs the U.S. Department of Education to consider the definition and examples of antisemitism promulgated by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (“IHRA”) when enforcing federal antidiscrimination laws, including Title VI, which prohibits discrimination and harassment on the basis of race, color and national origin in federally funded programs and activities. The IHRA’s definition is broad and encompasses both widely accepted forms of antisemitism and more controversial examples of criticism of the state of Israel that some view as infringing on the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment.

Zionist supporters have also made significant investments in China for propaganda purposes, but it is clear that such behavior is not welcomed in a non-religious country.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,111
Reactions
21 2,877
Age
65
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Good point @Iskander !
But you have also to remember that those airfields on the ground have 10 times more layered and complex air defences than any city. To overcome those defences is not a simple task. To Shayrat, the US fired 59 Tomahawk missiles. According to Russian sources 23 hit their targets.
Including UK and French missiles, there were 103 missiles’s fired at Shayrat. Some never made it to shore. But in total 71 missiles were intercepted by Syrian air defences. Even a country like Syria could defend their airbase to a certain degree. US an Israeli air bases would be much better protected.

Among The Airbases you want to destroy lie the aircraft carriers. They are the floating air bases and are even harder to hit. As well as its own AD systems, it has 3 to 4 Arleigh Burke Class destroyers and Virginia Class nuclear subs to defend it. Short of a nuclear strike, it is a bloody hard job to destroy a carrier group.

Even with a multi-layered system, there's no such thing as an impenetrable air defense...

Many sources estimate the number of Iranian missiles at 3,000. Many believe this is a lot. In fact, it's not enough.
If the missiles aren't very accurate, then more must be produced so that quantity becomes... quality! (This is exactly what the Russians are doing, and it applies not only to their missiles.)
You may remember that here, during a discussion of Turkish missile production, when someone mentioned the figure of 400, I suggested increasing it tenfold!
Actually, I felt awkward mentioning "8,000." 🙂
Yes, I understand that it's very expensive, but there's a general understanding that nothing is more valuable than a country's security! Especially in these turbulent times, with two major wars raging around us. It's also important to consider that the Turkish Air Force is aging, air defenses are also not strong enough.

There are other methods of penetrating air defenses, such as multiple warheads. I'm not an expert on Iranian missiles or missiles in general, but in my opinion, Iranian missiles have only one warhead. Some of their heavy missiles have warheads weighing a ton or a ton and a half. But what if they were divided into 10-20 parts?! Then the enemy would have to increase the number of anti-aircraft missiles accordingly. And they're expensive.
10-20 kg is usually enough to destroy an aircraft. (A lot depends on accuracy.)
Speaking about the Iranian war, I must say I was very disappointed with the Iranians, even though I had a general idea of their weaponry.

The Iranians are brave, but in the age of technology, in the era of non-contact warfare, that, unfortunately, means little.
The Iranians have a strange understanding of modern warfare.🙄
Israel also has vulnerabilities, for example, its land borders. The attack on Israel on October 7 was precisely such an incident. Incidentally, Iran's decade-long efforts to establish bases in Syria, right on the border with Israel, were no accident.
The ayatollahs, so to speak, were preparing for a classic war🙄

It should be added that not all interstate problems are resolved militarily. There is also diplomacy.
Undoubtedly, today, Iranian politicians who have not yet been assassinated understand that they made a mistake at the very beginning of their so-called revolution: was it worth Iran's while to intervene in the Arab-Israeli conflict?! 🙄
Before these militant ayatollahs came to power, Iran was developing at an incredible pace and possessed the best air force in the Middle East. The ayatollahs recklessly began a feud with the United States and very quickly destroyed... their own air force.

What did the ayatollahs achieve? The unification of the Islamic world? How could they have done this, being a Shiite country? This is absurd!

Over the past 47 years, the ayatollahs have made countless mistakes, and today poor iranians is paying for them.🙁
 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,273
Reactions
17 1,666
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Antisemitism... for some Jews includes criticism of or opposition to Zionism and criticism of or opposition to Israel and its actions. No ideology or state should be shielded from criticism or opposition. Some relevant links:

The HRA is, inevitably, not objective in its definition.


The IHRA definition was originally developed to guide research and law enforcement data validation before being used by the IHRA in its work, which includes education about the Holocaust and antisemitism. Adoption of the definition by governments and institutions is often framed as an essential step in efforts to combat antisemitism. In practice, however, the IHRA definition has often been used to wrongly label criticism of Israel as antisemitic, and thus chill and sometimes suppress, non-violent protest, activism and speech critical of Israel and/or Zionism, including in the US and Europe


If the UN adopts or endorses the IHRA definition, it will embolden governments to restrict legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies, and stifle growing calls for an end to the system of apartheid Israel imposes on Palestinians.

Heba Morayef, Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa, Amnesty International
 
Last edited:

hugh

Contributor
Messages
567
Reactions
17 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,867
Reactions
15 1,626
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Iran launched ballistic missile strikes of an unknown type on the Israeli cities of Dimona and Arad. Dimona is home to Israel's first nuclear research center, built in 1964 with French assistance. According to Iranian media, the strike on Dimona was a response to the attack on the Iranian nuclear facility in Natanz. The video also shows Israeli air defenses in action; they failed to intercept the Iranian missiles, and an investigation has already been launched. It's worth noting that ballistic missiles are a difficult target for any air defense system. The Iranian missile strikes destroyed buildings in both Israeli cities, causing injuries and deaths.

 

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
Dimona is home to Israel's first nuclear research center,
That's false. Nuclear research center is located 13 kms from Dimona.

Iranian missiles have around 200-300 m accuracy. So they deliberately attacked the civilian town. Like they always do.

Screenshot 2026-03-22 110926.png
 
Top Bottom