• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
2,867
Reactions
15 1,626
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Iran again launched ballistic missile attacks on the Israeli city of Tel Aviv and the Negev region. Tel Aviv's Iron Dome air defense system has become less active due to its diminishing stockpile. Israel's air defenses are now using missiles manufactured in 2026. It's worth noting that the US and Israel also launch missile strikes against Iran daily.

 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,251
Reactions
33 11,292
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Yes, Iran won 🙄
This is what a Pyrrhic victory should look like!
I can't list all the strategic targets destroyed by Iran's enemies. But considering that enemy aircraft destroyed hundreds of Iranian military and industrial facilities every day for 40 days...

The geopolitical genius of the wise Iranian ayatollahs was so brilliant that for the first time in history, a Muslim country simultaneously waged war against a Jewish, Christian, and several Muslim countries 🙄
Genius and wisdom literally poured from their long white beards 🙄

Its definitely a disaster and truth be told this is generally what "political islamist" politics looks like. They create a bad or worse situation and when they obtain the bad outcome they sell it as a success. So the worse option was to continue to sustain hundreds of american/isreali sorties a daily, or to take the bad option which is a "tempremental" ceasefire, which everyone knows will be broken as soon as it makes sense again by the isrealis.

Look at the zionist approach in the middle east, its always incremental. They push the envelope, then they stop and regroup to go again down the line. But each time they make their move their enemies are made weaker. Palestinians got many ceasefires too and celebrated many victories, today their that state faces near extinction.

Iranians should be asking themselves how were they governed so badly over the decades that only could find themselves in a position where america and isreal could bomb them with absolute impunity, where the americans were even openly declaring their complete and total extermination.

However from a Turkish perspective, this outcome is actually pretty good for us. Iranians live to fight another day which takes zionist focus off Turkiye. The iranians themselves took a massive ass pounding and massively depleted their own offensive stockpiles. Then to make the situation better the iranians attacked all her muslim neighbours which will force them to deal more favourably towards Turkiye.

Likewise the international reputation of the isrealis took another massive nose dive.
 

chibiyabi

Contributor
Messages
638
Reactions
3 568
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Togo
Its definitely a disaster and truth be told this is generally what "political islamist" politics looks like. They create a bad or worse situation and when they obtain the bad outcome they sell it as a success. So the worse option was to continue to sustain hundreds of american/isreali sorties a daily, or to take the bad option which is a "tempremental" ceasefire, which everyone knows will be broken as soon as it makes sense again by the isrealis.

Look at the zionist approach in the middle east, its always incremental. They push the envelope, then they stop and regroup to go again down the line. But each time they make their move their enemies are made weaker. Palestinians got many ceasefires too and celebrated many victories, today their that state faces near extinction.

Iranians should be asking themselves how were they governed so badly over the decades that only could find themselves in a position where america and isreal could bomb them with absolute impunity, where the americans were even openly declaring their complete and total extermination.

However from a Turkish perspective, this outcome is actually pretty good for us. Iranians live to fight another day which takes zionist focus off Turkiye. The iranians themselves took a massive ass pounding and massively depleted their own offensive stockpiles. Then to make the situation better the iranians attacked all her muslim neighbours which will force them to deal more favourably towards Turkiye.

Likewise the international reputation of the isrealis took another massive nose dive.
US also celebrate that this ceasefire like iran did, but ceasefire only for US vs Iran, Iran Vs Israel???
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,251
Reactions
33 11,292
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
US also celebrate that this ceasefire like iran did, but ceasefire only for US vs Iran, Iran Vs Israel???

we seen plenty of "ceasefires" in the middle east over the last 100 years. In nearly all cases the ceasefires were always to the benefit of the anglo-american zionist side.

Sometimes within the USA they have to stop for a while to quell public outrage, only to restart the process down the road rinse and repeat. If you remember a big selling point of trump was no more forever wars in the middle east. Turned out he was no different then any US president before him in terms of pursing greater middle east agenda.

Fool me once...... The middle easterner has been fooled plenty of times by the anglo-saxon.

Dont forget in the previous 12 day assault the iranians also celebrated the ceasefire and claimed "victory". Well since then got a 6 week assault. The next assault may be 6 months long.

The zionist project is complete and total conquest, its either them or the common Muslim.

Iranians should use whatever time they get to purchase and build as many missiles and drones as they can. I would even argue, Turkiye, Pakistan and others should sell or if need be donate weapons to iran. Not because iran is a friend, but because zionism is the greater threat here.

remember Turks these same zionists are selling the greeks weapons which will only ever be used against Turks. So play that same sleazy zionist game back on them, f'k em. Turkiye is the next iran is what they said, so lets make sure the first Iran remains as a constant headache for them.
 
Last edited:

AlperTunga

Committed member
Messages
253
Reactions
5 335
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Turkey
we seen plenty of "ceasefires" in the middle east over the last 100 years. In nearly all cases the ceasefires were always to the benefit of the anglo-american zionist side.

Sometimes within the USA they have to stop for a while to quell public outrage, only to restart the process down the road rinse and repeat. If you remember a big selling point of trump was no more forever wars in the middle east. Turned out he was no different then any US president before him in terms of pursing greater middle east agenda.

Fool me once...... The middle easterner has been fooled plenty of times by the anglo-saxon.

Dont forget in the previous 12 day assault the iranians also celebrated the ceasefire and claimed "victory". Well since then got a 6 week assault. The next assault may be 6 months long.

The zionist project is complete and total conquest, its either them or the common Muslim.

Iranians should use whatever time they get to purchase and build as many missiles and drones as they can. I would even argue, Turkiye, Pakistan and others should sell or if need be donate weapons to iran. Not because iran is a friend, but because zionism is the greater threat here.

remember Turks these same zionists are selling the greeks weapons which will only ever be used against Turks. So play that same sleazy zionist game back on them, f'k em. Turkiye is the next iran is what they said, so lets make sure the first Iran remains as a constant headache for them.
Iran surviving this way is the best outcome for Türkiye. But we should never sell any weapons to them. This would be a big mistake. We should keep our relations with US at least neutral as long as possible. Iran should buy stuff from China, Russia, and NK.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,857
Reactions
67 22,002
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

Iran ceasefire deal gives Trump a way out of war - but at a high cost​

8 hours ago


Anthony ZurcherNorth America correspondent
Kevin Lmarque / Reuters

In the end, cooler heads prevailed – at least for now.

At 18:32 Washington time, President Donald Trump posted on his social media website that the US and Iran were "very far along" with a "definitive" peace agreement and that he had agreed to a two-week ceasefire to allow negotiations to proceed.

It wasn't exactly the last minute, but with Trump's looming 20:00 EDT (00:00 GMT on Wednesday) deadline to reach a deal or the US would launch massive strikes against Iranian energy and transportation infrastructure, it came pretty close.

All of this is contingent on Iran also suspending hostilities and fully opening the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping traffic, which the regime says it will do, while insisting it still exerts "dominion" over the waterway.

The deal allowed Trump to extricate himself from what was shaping up to be a treacherous choice – either escalating with his promise that a "whole civilisation will die tonight" or backing down and undermining his credibility. The US president may have only bought himself a temporary reprieve, however.

The US and Iranians now will engage in negotiations over the next two weeks, buying some time to try to reach a permanent settlement. It is likely to be a bumpy ride, but in after-hours trading, the price of a barrel of oil dropped below the $100 mark for the first time in days and US stock futures soared. There appears to be a sense of optimism that the worst is over.

Even this kind of progress was far from certain as recently as Tuesday morning, when Trump threatened the death of Iranian civilisation, "never to be brought back again".


Whether such a jaw-dropping threat from an American president pressured Iran to agree to the kind of ceasefire they had previously rejected is uncertain. What is clear is that Trump's astounding, inflammatory declaration – just two days after a similar obscenity-laced Truth Social demand – is unlike anything a modern US president has ever levelled or hinted at.

And even if the two-week ceasefire does result in a permanent peace, the Iran war – and Trump's recent words – may have fundamentally altered the way the rest of the world views the US.

Tracking recent US-Israeli strikes on Iranian infrastructure​


Trump condemned over threat that Iran's 'civilisation will die'​


A nation that once styled itself as a force for stability around the globe is now shaking the foundations of the international order. A president who has seemingly relished shattering norms and traditions in domestic politics is now doing the same on the world stage.

Democrats were quick to condemn Trump's words on Tuesday, with some going so far as to call for his removal.

"It is clear that the president has continued to decline and is not fit to lead," wrote Congressman Joaquin Castro on X.

Chuck Schumer, the top Democrat in the US Senate, said any Republican who did not join in voting to end the Iran war "owns every consequence of whatever the hell this is".

While many in Trump's own party stood by their president, it was far from the near-universal support he often enjoys.


Austin Scott, Republican congressman from Georgia and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, strongly criticised Trump's threats about a civilisation dying.

"The president's comments are counter-productive," he told the BBC, "and I do not agree with them."

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, usually a Trump loyalist, said it would be a "huge mistake" if Trump followed through with his bombing campaign. Congressman Nathaniel Moran of Texas wrote on social media that he did not support "the destruction of a 'whole civilisation'".

"This is not who we are," he wrote, "and it is not consistent with the principles that have long guided America."

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who has frequently broken with the president, was equally direct, writing that the president's threat "cannot be excused away as an attempt to gain leverage in negotiations with Iran".


The White House is likely to counter that the leverage worked, however. And for a president who has faced declining poll numbers, a growing number of critics within his own party and an economy that is struggling over higher energy prices, any off-ramp in the conflict is likely to come as a relief.

In his Truth Social post announcing the ceasefire, Trump said that the US had "met and exceeded" all its military objectives.



Iran's military has been significantly degraded. Although its Islamic fundamentalist regime is still in power, many of its top leaders have been killed in bombing strikes.
At the moment, however, many of the stated American objectives are still in doubt. The disposition of Iran's enriched uranium – the foundation of its nuclear weapons programme – is unknown. The nation still has influence over regional proxies, such as the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

And even if Iran does fully open Hormuz – without conditioning passage on tolls or other payments – its ability to control the key geopolitical chokepoint is more clear now than ever.

In a statement after Trump's ceasefire message, Iranian foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said that Iran would halt its "defensive operations" and allow safe passage through the Hormuz "via coordination with Iran's armed forces". He added that the US had accepted the "general framework" of the Iranian 10-point plan.

That plan includes the US withdrawing its military forces from the region, lifting economic sanctions on Iran, paying compensation for war damages and allowing Iran to maintain control over Hormuz. It is hard to imagine Trump actually agreeing to any of those conditions – a sign that the next two weeks of negotiations could be treacherous.

For the moment, however, this is a partial political victory for Trump. He made a dramatic threat and achieved the desired result. But the ceasefire is a reprieve, not a permanent settlement.

The long-term cost of the president's words and actions, and of the war overall, has yet to be fully assessed.

_____________________________________________________________

You know those 2 weeks are a short respite, and US and Israel being unscrupulous anything can happen. I wonder if Iran can find enough support from Russia and China to quickly replace some of the defends capabilities they've lost.

Israel definitely won't stop, because they're in for some Landgrabbing.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
546
Reactions
18 974
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
As we proceed to *Islamabad Talks*, I wish to extend our deepest and sincere gratitude to our brotherly countries People’s Republic of China, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Türkiye, Arab Republic of Egypt and State of Qatar for extending invaluable and all out support towards reaching the ceasefire and giving peaceful diplomatic efforts a chance to seek a comprehensive and conclusive end to the conflict.

I would also like to deeply appreciate and thank our brotherly countries of Gulf Cooperation Council, whose consistent support and commitment to peace and stability in the region remains quintessential for our efforts.

The leadership of all our brotherly countries and United States of America demonstrated exceptional strategic foresight, sagacity and patience in giving peace a chance.

I also thank all our partners and friends across the globe who have reached out and acknowledged Pakistan’s sincere efforts for the global peace.

Let us all work together to forge a lasting peace in the region and
beyond!



The PM of Pakistan use 4 types of language to post it.
China has willing to help to build a peaceful Middle East, but I still doubt how this situation(Isreal is still invade and bomb other country so it is hard to say peace now) could go on.
What is the opinion of the people in pakistan, turkey and other country?
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,272
Reactions
17 1,665
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom

Iran says negotiations to be held in Pakistanpublished at 01:47​

01:47​


84235ea3-e168-4601-8945-9467e76fa41f.jpg.webp
Ghoncheh Habibiazad
Senior reporter, BBC Persian


Iran's Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) has said in a statement following the announced conditional ceasefire that negotiations will be held in Pakistan’s capital Islamabad within a maximum period of 15 days for the details to be "finalised". The statement has said that the negotiations will be held so that "Iran's victory in the field would also be consolidated in political negotiations".

The statement has gone beyond the 10-point plan that had been announced by state TV, and the statement has said that the US has agreed to:

  • Guarantee not to repeat its "aggression" against Iran
  • The continuation of Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz
  • Acceptance of [uranium] enrichment
  • Lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions
  • Termination of all resolutions of the [UN] Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency
  • Payment of compensation to Iran
  • Withdrawal of US combat forces from the region
  • And the cessation of war on all fronts, including against the "Islamic resistance of Lebanon"

So, after 5 weeks of widespread destruction and many deaths due to the US+Israel attacks on Iran, few, if any, of the US objectives have been met.

I understand that Iran wishes henceforth to charge a fee to ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Does passage of large vessels require passage through Iranian waters?

Apart from weakening Iran militarily, I see the US having achieved nothing by the last 5 weeks of war.
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,857
Reactions
67 22,002
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I am curious, but how are the Gulf countries going to deal with this. They harbour US bases that was used to attack Iran. Are they going to suck it up for peace ?

US used the bases to attack Iran alongside the fighterjets.

Those refueling jets didn't fly back to US to reload fuel for the campaign.

So I am almost certain those Gulf countries will foot the bill and US will give something else in return. As I am certain US economy footing another bill for reconstruction of Iran would be very expensive.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
4,251
Reactions
33 11,292
Nation of residence
United Kingdom

obviously isreal wants some time to deal with lebanon alone, then they can divert their attentions back to iran. Basically pick them off one by one. This ceasefire i doubt lasts very long.

iranians shouldnt be celebrating, because what comes next will be worse then what they just experienced. They should be preparing themselves for total war.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,111
Reactions
21 2,877
Age
65
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
I am curious, but how are the Gulf countries going to deal with this. They harbour US bases that was used to attack Iran. Are they going to suck it up for peace ?

US used the bases to attack Iran alongside the fighterjets.

Those refueling jets didn't fly back to US to reload fuel for the campaign.

So I am almost certain those Gulf countries will foot the bill and US will give something else in return. As I am certain US economy footing another bill for reconstruction of Iran would be very expensive.
You're not alone in your curiosity.
After all, this is the most important question for the entire Middle East.
It can be further clarified:
Will the US make Iran "great again," as Trump promised? 🙂
Or will they "destroy Iran as a civilization," as Trump promised? 🙂
Of course, the region is complex (I admit, architects labored for over two centuries, creating dozens of states on the site of just one – the Ottoman Empire), but that's understandable. But first, we need to understand Mr. Trump, and then the region. Trump is no less complex. 🙂
While the region hopes that some kind person from across the beautiful ocean will arrive on a huge aircraft carrier and solve all its problems, he won't solve them.
A "kind person" has absolutely no interest in solving other people's problems. Or rather, he's interested in the opposite: making them even more complicated! Even if he solves one minor problem, he will inevitably create two big ones right next to it. So they'll turn to him for "help" again.

After all, if he solves all the region's problems, no one here will need him anymore!

By the way, just a couple of hours after the bombing of Iran, Trump promised a "golden age" for the region🫢
Well, well! 🙂
 
Last edited:

4MikeEcho

Active member
Messages
35
Reactions
1 57
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Tahiti
How has Jordan been able to escape the fate of the rest of the Arab countries that entered the war ? Most of the attack aircraft are likely flying from Jordan, and not the Gulf countries.

Did Iran decide that Jordan was not worth it to waste missiles and better to maintain pressure on Israel and GCC? I would have thought at least the Houthis would have tried Jordan.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
546
Reactions
18 974
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Seem like the Isreal is not going to follow the peace agreement at all.
And US is keeping transfer their soldier to Middle East.
Donnot they have feeling of shame?
 

Azeri441

Contributor
Messages
565
Reactions
6 1,964
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Seem like the Isreal is not going to follow the peace agreement at all.
And US is keeping transfer their soldier to Middle East.
Donnot they have feeling of shame?

I don't think anyone knows whats going on with the ceasefire, there doesn't even seem to be an actual agreed on plan
every side is saying different things
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,857
Reactions
67 22,002
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
We'll see. If Iran is smart they'll try to pit Trump against Bibi. the harder the pressure on Trump the more he might be willing to smack Bibi with something that could fracture the relationship.

All Iran has to do is stick it out and bite hard if pressured or if the war resumes. Don't give Trump the respite he needs for the coming elections.
 
Top Bottom