Latest Thread
Kirpi bigger than Vuran, it can carry 9 people while Kirpi can carry 13.Any info about Kirpi vs Vuran difference , to me looks same MRAP from same company with same size and same stanag 3 protection so why 2 vihacles with 2 different names ?
I am on my fucking knees right now. Finally.Furthermore, the contracts for our next-generation 6x6 and 8x8 vehicles will be signed, the configurations and qualifications for special-purpose technical wheeled armored vehicles (ÖMTTZA) in 5 different variants will be completed, and the delivery of vehicles under the GZPT and ZMA modernization programs will be part of our activities related to land vehicles in 2025."
Adding to this. Looks like Korhan-35 has been renamed SARP 100/35 and is being depicted on an what looks to me like Pars Alpha vehicle on Aselsans site...I am on my fucking knees right now. Finally.
Those Aselsan samples are more or less the same ones FNSS had on their Pars Alpha brochureAdding to this. Looks like Korhan-35 has been renamed SARP 100/35 and is being depicted on an what looks to me like Pars Alpha vehicle on Aselsans site...
View attachment 73075
View attachment 73077
We also have Gürz on what again looks to me like an Pars Alpha Vehicle
View attachment 73076
This of course does not have to mean something but interesting that they have chosen this vehicle instead of their generic 8x8 APC they usually use.
Aselsan seems to have added also a new(?) turret to its collection which SUPRISE is actually equipped with an ATGM launcher named SARP 200/30:
View attachment 73078
View attachment 73079
Oh and I think we have a better look at KAMA?
View attachment 73080
I'm looking at their website and they seem like they are mostly focused on radars, mission systems and communication systems, electronics and so on. I'm really curious now as well, this looks weird on paper. They are working on EF and A400M as well, mostly dealing with simulators and survivability.Interesting news. Spanish Indra and Otokar signed a deal to collaborate on land systems. Wonder what'll come out of it.
He means the ÖMTTZA program here, not YNZMA. ÖMTTZA is now 3 years behind schedule. Görgün also said last month that deliveries for ÖMTTZA would start in 2025. Unclear which engine will be used.He adds it was late because of engine problem and deliveries will start this year.
ÖMTTZA(100 vehicles. 95 sensor, radar, CBRN and command vehicles, 5 IFVs for gendarme) was signed in Dec 2019 and had a project length of 36 months. All deliveries were to be completed from 24th to 36th months. At this point, no deliveries have been made and program is 2 years behind the schedule. Boys in the army are still using M113s for these roles and gendarme still don't have their IFVs.
Tümosan was to deliver the engines for these vehicles. As we haven't heard anything from their development in years, I think Tümosan engines are left behind and they will probably use BMC's Azra if and when it becomes ready. What a sham. For this exact point, unless deliveries are complete, we can never, evet trust a procurement to go through. Another lesson in bad project management.
I see. I didn't know there was such a tender so I didn't pay attention to "Özel Maksatlı".He means the ÖMTTZA program here, not YNZMA. ÖMTTZA is now 3 years behind schedule. Görgün also said last month that deliveries for ÖMTTZA would start in 2025. Unclear which engine will be used.