Some said its locals who ambushed them.
Will see whats going on.
The airstrikes are all to send a message to Turkiye.
Syria is a weapon depot, every home have his weapon depot. Israel can not fight in Syria, they will learn the hard way.
Latest Thread
Some said its locals who ambushed them.
Will see whats going on.
The airstrikes are all to send a message to Turkiye.
Are American bases still protecting the YPG in the north east? If so, you got to deal with that first before you deal with Israel.
Also
Remember Turks the Isrealis and their American/European coalition in 13 years couldn't do anything about Assad. Yet, with the introduction of the Turkish army these Isrealis are threatening Julani directly.
Look, no Arab country wants to fight Israel over Gaza. Why should we, non-Arabs? Who are we to be hostile to America, which stands behind Israel?
You probably know about the Abraham Accords. This is an agreement between Israel and Arab countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia and others. All these Arab countries cooperate with the US on security issues! Don't they see that the Americans stand behind Israel?! They see it, and yet...
So why should we (Azerbaijan) be hostile to Israel over Gaza, forgotten by Allah? Why should we be, as they say, more Catholic than the Pope?
And yet, in all UN votes, we invariably support Palestine along with 57 Muslim states.
The Arab-Israeli problem is not our problem. Even the superpowers cannot (most likely do not want to) solve it. Why should we, a small state with its own problems, get involved in someone else's thousand-year-old problem and feud with someone over someone?
Even a newcomer to foreign policy, the new leader of Syria, Ahmed al-Shara, understands and, it seems, approves of our position. Yesterday, he sent Aliyev a letter congratulating him on the Ramadan holiday: "Mr. President, dear brother!" etc. etc.
Our foreign policy has been tested for decades. Over 34 years of independence, not a single government has considered it necessary to change it even by an iota. Simply put, it is:
1. alliance with Turkey;
2. distancing ourselves from Russia and Iran;
3. hostility with Armenia;
4. friendship with Georgia.
You may have noticed that during the Karabakh war, NATO member Canada, immediately after the first TB-2 was shot down and Canadian optronic modules were found in it, immediately banned its supply to Turkey, a member of the same organization.No one is asking that Azerbaijan should do something about the conflict in Palestine because they can’t
And I won’t talk about the Azerbaijan oil supply to Israel because moral and ethics are subjected nowadays
But Azerbaijan shouldn’t take part under any circumstances with the coming Iran-Israel next middle east great war . If you will side with Israel and US , it’s ok but you have to bare the consequences, and it’s going to be deadly
Look at what will happen to Qatar soon
Do you know something we dont know?But Azerbaijan shouldn’t take part under any circumstances with the coming Iran-Israel next middle east great war . If you will side with Israel and US , it’s ok but you have to bare the consequences, and it’s going to be deadly
Look at what will happen to Qatar soon
Honestly, I agree with you on this 100%The north got ignored and AKP made peace with PKK/YPG... now they're a ticking timb bomb. I say take the whole north and screw their corridor.
I think right now its quite likely that Azerbaijan would coordinate with and support Israel in the event of a direct conflict with Iran. They may not allow direct engagement from their territory, if the probabilities of success are too uncertain, but within managed risk they would try to facilitate the opportunity to retake South Azerbaijan for sure.You may have noticed that during the Karabakh war, NATO member Canada, immediately after the first TB-2 was shot down and Canadian optronic modules were found in it, immediately banned its supply to Turkey, a member of the same organization.
But Israel did not stop supplying us with weapons during the war, despite strong pressure from many Christian countries and organizations.
We appreciate it.
Of course, we do not need to interfere in the squabbles of the "big guys". It is unlikely that anyone will attack Iran from our territory. So the probable attack will happen without our participation. But in the event of the Ayatollahs losing control over the country or the northwestern region and probable chaos in the area where millions of Turks live, I do not rule out our participation in order to protect our brothers.
There is nothing to take in Syria. Syria needs help in strengthening the central government, taking control of its own territories and normal development of the country. Then, in a sense, all of Syria will be yours.Honestly, I agree with you on this 100%
If Turkey took Northern Syria, then the T4 airbase would be useless and even Israel wouldnt mind Turkey getting the T4 airbase if the north is under Turkey
But here is the problem, the north is protected by the US and the SDF still lives; thus, it is important for the TSK to take the T4 airbase to surround the PKK from all sodes and slowly suffocate it and Israel wont sit quietly and watch the PKK, which is the most potent card against Turkey, be reduced to mere rubble
As I told you before, it is now a game of wits and who is willing to sacrifice the most to get what he wants. Will Israel control Syria for Israel's interest or will Turkey control Syria for Turkey and Syria's interests? This is the question and only time will tell which side will win
Look, Armenia, with the support of Russia, occupied our territory. 25 years later, when Russian-Armenian relations were at their worst, we attacked and defeated the Armenian army. Because of Turkey's support, the Russians did not dare to start a war, and they had to watch from afar as their ally was being slaughtered.I think right now its quite likely that Azerbaijan would coordinate with and support Israel in the event of a direct conflict with Iran. They may not allow direct engagement from their territory, if the probabilities of success are too uncertain, but within managed risk they would try to facilitate the opportunity to retake South Azerbaijan for sure.
It would be insane for two nuclear-capable states to engage in such activity however. I don't think any non-nuclear state should be eager to become an open beligerent in such a scenario.
Of course, we do not need to interfere in the squabbles of the "big guys". It is unlikely that anyone will attack Iran from our territory. So the probable attack will happen without our participation
But in the event of the Ayatollahs losing control over the country or the northwestern region and probable chaos in the area where millions of Turks live, I do not rule out our participation in order to protect our brothers.
No, it's not. Stop projecting your inferiority upon other races.This Turks brotherhood is the bullshit opium for nationalists