Latest Thread
Is GM literal translation for NLOS? "Görüşdışı menzili".
What would be the difference between Kuzgun KY with this? Warhead weight?I think a man-in-the-loop missile with a range of around 30 km is coming. (UMTAS-GM)
Kuzgun-SS is a guided munition weighing nearly 100 kg.I think Kuzgun is not meant to be used against heavy armor.
As far as I can understand, we will transform the UMTAS missile group into a product range that covering 500 to 25K/30K meter range, like Rafael Spike. Already UMTAS and L-UMTAS are actively used on various platforms. It may be possible to reach much longer ranges by slightly increasing the missile length and fins area. It is not portable, but if it can use the same launcher, it can be very useful by some tactical vehicles and attack helicopters or even attack boats.What would be the difference between Kuzgun KY with this? Warhead weight?
Won't mean much if the missile speed is as doodoo as its rumored to be.As far as I can understand, we will transform the UMTAS missile group into a product range that covering 500 to 25K/30K meter range, like Rafael Spike. Already UMTAS and L-UMTAS are actively used on various platforms. It may be possible to reach much longer ranges by slightly increasing the missile length and fins area. It is not portable, but if it can use the same launcher, it can be very useful by some tactical vehicles and attack helicopters or even attack boats.
Will it be slower than the L-UMTAS? I didn't find any information on that, could you please share what exactly is being speculated? I certainly don't see it as a bad idea to provide very long range UMTAS, behind-the-scenes/beyond-line-of-sight engagement for chopper's most battle enviroment which a system already have RF data link, precision guidance and control capability and really efective armour-piercing tandem warhead.Won't mean much if the missile speed is as doodoo as its rumored to be.
It was discussed in this forum in the past that UMTAS missiles are slower than their counterparts. I might be plain wrong though. Surely some other member with better knowledge would enlighten us.Will it be slower than the L-UMTAS? I didn't find any information on that, could you please share what exactly is being speculated? I certainly don't see it as a bad idea to provide very long range UMTAS, behind-the-scenes/beyond-line-of-sight engagement for chopper's most battle enviroment which a system already have RF data link, precision guidance and control capability and really efective armour-piercing tandem warhead.
Yes, they are slower because of the IIR version (more time for the "man" in the loop)It was discussed in this forum in the past that UMTAS missiles are slower than their counterparts. I might be plain wrong though. Surely some other member with better knowledge would enlighten us.
So, if this GM-UMTAS is equipped with a mmWave radar seeker, it would be faster, right?Yes, they are slower because of the IIR version (more time for the "man" in the loop)
No ideaSo, if this GM-UMTAS is equipped with a mmWave radar seeker, it would be faster, right?
So, if this GM-UMTAS is equipped with a mmWave radar seeker, it would be faster, right?
No idea
www.savunmasanayist.com
Mr. İKİNCİ: "Sub-Atmaca will be test fired this year"
![]()
Roketsan'dan denizaltıdan atılan ATMACA müjdesi
Roketsan, ATMACA Füzesini denizaltıdan atmaya hazırlanıyor. Denizaltıdan atılacak ATMACA Füzesi ile ilgili son gelişmeleri, Genel Müdür Murat İkinci aktardı.www.savunmasanayist.com
Obviously torpedo tube. Our submarine fleet doesn't have VLS capability.From a torpedo tube or VLS?