TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
935
Reactions
13 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
UAV-230 has about the same specifications as TRG-230, but has more than twice the range, 150+ km to TRG's 70 km. I believe same thing happened when Roketsan tested UAV-122 as well. So, TRG-300 when launched from an F-16, which flies higher and faster than an Akıncı, it should easily surpass 200+ kms of range.

These artillery rocket turned missiles would naturally be more expensive than, for example, a MK83 + a guidance kit, but, in comparison to a cruise missile they would be far more economical. We already produce and use lots of MK series bombs with guidance kits and recently got Tolun. With these new ones, we'll be filling an empty position between guided bombs and cruise missiles, they have great range, supersonic and relatively cheap so they are a great option to have.
Plus hard to intercept than a cruise missile right?
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,632
Reactions
37 19,741
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well, I was also thinking that if we don't change the weight too much, but make it lighter with same warhead then it would be possible to launch these from Akinci, KE, Anka and such.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,908
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Plus hard to intercept than a cruise missile right?
It is and it isn't, I imagine. Yes, it is far faster than a cruise missile like Çakır, which might make it harder to intercept for some systems, but it also cannot change its course or hide itself using the terrain or other advanced manoeuvres like that as far as I know. Just like any other system, it has its ups and down and its place in our inventory. Especially for UAVs like Akıncı, a missile with a range of 150+ km that an UAV can carry multiple of is a great option to have.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,908
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well, I was also thinking that if we don't change the weight too much, but make it lighter with same warhead then it would be possible to launch these from Akinci, KE, Anka and such.
UAV-122 and 230 have already been launched from Akıncı and made for drones, as the name is a dead give away. I'm not sure if they can carry TRG-300, its about 600 kg so I'm not sure if they can carry it under their wings but Akıncı can probably carry 1 under its fuselage. Air launched TRG-300 would be a better choice for F-16, imo, as it can carry multiple easily.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,246
Reactions
141 16,258
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
UAV-122 and 230 have already been launched from Akıncı and made for drones, as the name is a dead give away. I'm not sure if they can carry TRG-300, its about 600 kg so I'm not sure if they can carry it under their wings but Akıncı can probably carry 1 under its fuselage. Air launched TRG-300 would be a better choice for F-16, imo, as it can carry multiple easily.
Israeli Rampage is the same as a trg300 adapted to be carried and launched by F16s. It can be fired whilst f16 is at supersonic speeds, and 4 of them can be carried by an f16.
These missiles fly at 4.2 mach at mid course and are difficult to intecrept. Israelis give 250km range with impact velocity between 1.1-1.6 Mach. Non guided 300mm rocket artillery are cheap. But when guided, they can be above 25K dollars a piece. American ones are 45K a piece. Nevertheless , they are much more economical and comparatively expendable in quantity than cruise missiles.
But due to their ballistic trajectories they can be tracked from a long distance. A subsonic cruise missile like SOM, can fly close to surface and may only be picked by radars when it is ~30 km from its target. As it has stealth construction and can navigate the terrain, it may be too late to intercept. But it costs over a million dollars.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,408
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,908
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
But when guided, they can be above 25K dollars a piece. American ones are 45K a piece.
Damn, that is dirt cheap in comparison to even smaller missiles, even Hellfires are around 100k as far as I know. Now I really hope Roketsan is working on an air launched version. They would be an especially great option in a saturation attack along with cruise missiles and long range kamikaze drones, for example.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,246
Reactions
141 16,258
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Any source?
It was an educated guess on the basis of below sources. But you can find some of these freely with a google search.


SS60 and SS80 artillery rockets produced by Brazil have costs similar to the ones I have given.

Today it is a sellers’ market. US has doubled the price of their MLRS and Atacms missiles after their success in Ukraine.
Chinese are asking near 100K for their 300mm guided rockets, after it hit a moving sea target.

We know that it first cost us around 25K, to produce the HGK & KGK guided bombs, to make a couple of thousand dollar dumb bomb, smart. That is when US were selling them to us for 95K when it was costing them only 21K. Now our costs must have come down too.

A 300mm artillery rocket is a ballistic dumb bomb, that is thrown in the air like a fireworks rocket that has guidance as it starts it’s free fall. How much you spend and add to it in terms of guidance decides the cost price. NOT the sale price.

Bangladesh, according to unverified sources, bought 18+ TRG300 missile systems for 60 million dollars. Each truck loaded with 4 rockets. Those specialised trucks with electronics are over 1.5 million dollars each. How many spare rockets they bought is another mystery. You do the math.

M270 MLRS missiles were 14000 dollars a piece in 1983 when Hellfire missiles were 45000 dollars. Before the Ukraine war , between 2010 and 2020, Hellfire was 70K and M270 missiles were 45K. Then it went up to 85K. Now doubled to 165K. Hellfire now is in excess of 150K. “Supply and Demand” rules the price.

The 300mm artillery rockets are easily expendable missiles. That is the whole idea of artillery rockets. To replace artillery rounds whilst giving more range and area coverage.
Israelis, before anything else, are good businessmen. They would not have these expendable rockets on their planes, if they were too expensive.

The trick here is to produce these yourself. Not to buy them. Or you get a bill for 23 billion dollars!!


 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom