Latest Thread
Thermobaric weapons are nothing like a Nuclear weapon. Even the smallest fission based nuclear weapon in the arsenal of nuclear powers have got an explosive power of 1 kilo ton or more when used as a tactical weapon. That is the power of 1 thousand tons of TNT being exploded.
Current thermonuclear bombs are as small as a 1 Megatons - that is 1 million tons of TNT strength- up to 50 megatons.
Never mind the immediate and secondary fallout of radioactive destruction they impart.
Our Gazap, is a 1 ton bomb. TNT equivalency of a thermobaric bomb is between 1.1 to 1.9 times the weight of the bomb. So a 1 ton MK84 carries 429 kg of explosives. So it has a TNT explosive strength of roughly just under 1 ton.
I am afraid I have to agree with @Sanchez
Germans should first complain about Americans, Russians and Chinese plus UK armed forces that have US manufactured versions, who are known to have openly used these weapons.
There is absolutely no legislation or international agreement that bans the use of these weapons.
That’s why I get mad at this comment actually. That’s why I call it arbitrary for there’s No international law limiting the size, usage and restricting development of thermo baric bombs. It’s a zealot effort to limit and oust Turkish military masked behind phony “mass destruction” weapon allegations.Germans should first complain about Americans, Russians and Chinese plus UK armed forces that have US manufactured versions, who are known to have openly used these weapons.
There is absolutely no legislation or international agreement that bans the use of these weapons.
Hardly, we have ballistic missiles that carry at least 2 times the TNT value in service today. We plan to introduce ones that carry 5 times that. Gazap is the largest and most destructive conventional bomb we can use from our puny F-16s, that's it. A thermobaric bomb is not a strategic threat to anyone, comparing it to a "non nuclear deterrent" is just nonsense. If you were talking about ballistic missiles, sure you could have a point. Koreans delivered their IRBM sized short range bunker buster Hyunmoo-5 ballistic missiles last year which reportedly carry an 8 ton warhead; that's 16 times the TNT value. That could be considered a strategic asset against North Koreans by some margin. But a 2000lb sized thermobaric bomb is not that at all. TOS-1 is not a strategic threat to anyone; an RPG with a thermobaric warhead is only a threat to a cave.These weapons represent the highest conventional level.
Am I not patriotic enough for you today?You should consider German reaction to Gazap before nonsensing.
We already do, to mainly sell for export. Turkey literally fuels the munition delivery schedules to Ukraine. While our own army still bleeds for modern weapons. Anyone reading the recent weekly MSB reports?Türkiye must produce weapons like there is no tomorrow, always aiming for bigger and more destructive weapons.
Gazap is not that big like media tell , in reality is just thermobaric mk84 bomb , its blast effect is almost same as other bombs with same weight , İts little weaker to Russian 1500kg one But the real Bomb that is far ahead of others its HAYALET (NEB 2) which go throw 7 meter c50 concrete and 2mm steel while others countries with same size can go just 2 meter same as Turkiye older NEB 1 . İ dont know how Turkiye reach that nivel of tech but is amazing and i hope no other country can copy our tech for at least 10 years .Multiple Gazaps can be used to carpet bomb a target for bigger and selective effect. Gazap is a stop gap solution before we make nukes.