TR Missile & Smart Munition Programs

Turkic

Committed member
Messages
247
Reactions
4 479
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
WHAT???

Selcuk Bayraktar:
"Turkey offers a wide range of munitions, including supersonic missiles. From the Bayraktar TB3, munitions are launched that travel at four times the speed of sound and reach 100,000 feet (altitude?). No one else in the world has this."


IHA-230?
 

zio

Contributor
Messages
464
Reactions
10 638
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Even our domestic missiles are inferior to American missiles,its best for us due to cyber security issues,please read wikileaks about CIA protego project that how stinger missiles can not be used from predefined geographic areas,and self destruction modules.They can apply easily to ESSM or other SA and AA missiles.You can not trust to USA if you are not Israel.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,638
Reactions
203 18,550
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Even our domestic missiles are inferior to American missiles,its best for us due to cyber security issues,please read wikileaks about CIA protego project that how stinger missiles can not be used from predefined geographic areas,and self destruction modules.They can apply easily to ESSM or other SA and AA missiles.You can not trust to USA if you are not Israel.
How do you know that our missiles are inferior to the US ones? Do you think that our airforce would accept an inferior quality a2a missile when they have been using the US built ones and know all their kinematics?
US missiles are not infallible either. We saw in Ukraine how after initial success the US built HIMARS were falling victim to Russian EW attacks.
We have been using 300 to 500km range artillery rockets and SRBMs for quite sometime. US never had a ground attack missile system with more than 300km. Only recently have they started to build the 500km range PRSM.
The Russians have Kinzhal and Zircon hypersonic missiles. US don’t have one yet. Our Tayfun is a hypersonic missile. Block4 version of it will be one that is a cut above the rest.

Yes, US may have the tech and know how to build more innovative missiles. But other countries are no slouch either.

It is normal for a country to develop technology about how to make the missiles they produce unusable by hacking them. Or develop countermeasures to make their missiles inert should they be used against them. It would be naive of them if they didn’t.

ESSM missile is developed and produced by a consortium of 12 countries. So they are privy to all technical details of this missile. The countries are: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Turkey, the United States, Belgium and Portugal.
 
Last edited:

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,754
Reactions
14,395
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Even our domestic missiles are inferior to American missiles,its best for us due to cyber security issues,please read wikileaks about CIA protego project that how stinger missiles can not be used from predefined geographic areas,and self destruction modules.They can apply easily to ESSM or other SA and AA missiles.You can not trust to USA if you are not Israel.
What's with the defeatist attitude?
 

zio

Contributor
Messages
464
Reactions
10 638
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
EW against GPS signals are becoming harder than before.The reason is new generation satellites are lower orbit than previous ones,so GPS signals gain power and more resistant to jamming,another aspect is military GPS signals carry a crypted key they call M code,is also resistant to spoof.Our country does not have its own GPS system and depends to America,Russia and European GPS systems.During war time our GPS guided missiles could not reach the signals,if they close it on our geographic area,just rely on INS makes CEP values worse.Navigation of warship and fighters also would be somehow effected.We must get our GPS sistems at least for local areas,like indians and,Japaneese did their systems.We are working on land based GPS jamming systems,to self defence.Meteksan working on called seymen,8/60 (sekizaltmış) made a Ms23 with 100 watt against all GPS systems for jamming,but 100 watt is not good,should be 1kW.Overall we have not our GPS systems to create signals and nor the sufficient Jamming systems to protect our land and seas,and this is reality not inferior thinking.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,638
Reactions
203 18,550
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
D
EW against GPS signals are becoming harder than before.The reason is new generation satellites are lower orbit than previous ones,so GPS signals gain power and more resistant to jamming,another aspect is military GPS signals carry a crypted key they call M code,is also resistant to spoof.Our country does not have its own GPS system and depends to America,Russia and European GPS systems.During war time our GPS guided missiles could not reach the signals,if they close it on our geographic area,just rely on INS makes CEP values worse.Navigation of warship and fighters also would be somehow effected.We must get our GPS sistems at least for local areas,like indians and,Japaneese did their systems.We are working on land based GPS jamming systems,to self defence.Meteksan working on called seymen,8/60 (sekizaltmış) made a Ms23 with 100 watt against all GPS systems for jamming,but 100 watt is not good,should be 1kW.Overall we have not our GPS systems to create signals and nor the sufficient Jamming systems to protect our land and seas,and this is reality not inferior thinking.
Do you think Aselsan guys are sitting on their laurels? They are aware of the GPS systems being blocked. We lived through it during North Syria operations.
To prove that without GPS they could find target, they used an Atmaca firing and hit the target with bulls eye accuracy in the middle of the sea. That was 5 years ago.


Without GPS a HGK bomb can hit target with a CEP of 10metres.


Akıncı has completed a firing test of Teber82 without the need for GPS with on board sensors and INS. This was done 3 years ago.


There is also the terrain mapping guidance that missiles like SOM use. Missile receives terrain pictures and co-relates that to the images in its data bank. It also has a picture of the target it needs to hit. Once it acquires it then it is game over for the target.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom