TR Naval Programs

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,124
Solutions
1
Reactions
35 14,680
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Ordered , but delayed in delivery as part of EU’s stance against us in East Med stand off with Greece. Could that be the reason and incentive that we quickly produced our 76/62mm version?
Being a lot cheaper than the Italian gun I remember officials claiming that, we were since offered the SR at a much reduced price when they realised that we had succeeded in manufacturing a replacement.
Luckily for the Italians the I-Class it self was also delayed due to embargoed items like MK-41 VLS.
The reduced price is still far more expensive than the MKE gun. The reduced price is comparable to the cost of the prototype MKE gun. 76mm SR for I class doesn't have Strales. It uses Aselsan TAKS. Yes, delayed delivery was what made us accelerate the development of MKE guns but MKE was laying the groundwork to produce naval guns long before any delay, similar to MIDLAS VLS project of Roketsan. We ordered and signed a contract for the first SR gun which is why we are getting it. There is no new order for SR guns up to now. We will see if there will be any but I highly doubt it because lead times are insane even when there is no delay.
 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Happy New Year everyone!
I am making some infographics and I would like to ask why the AREAS-2N ECM system equips the LHD but it was not considered suitable for the Istif frigates and instead they will be fitted with the less capable AREAS-2NC (four antennas)? I have seen also maquettes from IDEF 21 where Istif-class is fitted with both AREAS-2NC and AREAS-2N which doesn't make sense.

Happy New Year,

It wasn't as 'not found suitable' but back in time Navy was looking an effective system at affordable prices by applying minor changes on Ada Class to create the I-Class. At some point i don't know what happened, the Navy was given a go to for a different design and a contract was signed with STM to conduct design studies altogether with design project offfice. At the first design (before the contract) they placed the EA on side of the bridge to cover as much as possible, without modifying the existing mast and the EMI scheme.

However, DPO is known to abuse such instances and they instead went for a design nearly overhauled the sensor suite in comparison to Ada class at greater prices.

I can't evaluate the up or downs or what Navy considered while opting for cassegrain and omitting the phased array but i know even at the current form the phased array (AREAS-2N) can be integrated on the AREAS-2NC position if found necessary (it was designed as such).

Also i doubt if the spot on sides of the bridge is made to support AREAS-2NC with the current update. All coolers and cabling are mainly around-in the new mast.

So, the final design is what available in STM's brochures (with minor changes), the mockup with both AREAS 2N and 2NC is not accurate.

Ordered , but delayed in delivery as part of EU’s stance against us in East Med stand off with Greece. Could that be the reason and incentive that we quickly produced our 76/62mm version?
Being a lot cheaper than the Italian gun I remember officials claiming that, we were since offered the SR at a much reduced price when they realised that we had succeeded in manufacturing a replacement.
Luckily for the Italians the I-Class it self was also delayed due to embargoed items like MK-41 VLS.
Leonardo has not delayed it but at a certain point they weren't giving the gun at all, then they relaxed it "weapon only but no smart munitions", "no training munitions" etc. SSB delagate have visited Italy several times from April to July in 2022 which then they somehow resolved this matter but it is already late, Navy has made the 76mm, not MKE. MKE is merely a middle man there.

This is the final:
1659341694275.png
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

No need to make it seem mysterious, ASFAT was not a bidder in I-Class 2-3-4 construction thus military shipyards are already out of the scope.

And there are three options;

TAIS or/and STM gets the project. Pick the wise one.
 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
TF2000_Side_Detail_23 .jpg


TF2000, not a double post, a HD version of what is being circulated among the media.
 

Ripley

Contributor
USA Correspondent
Messages
679
Reactions
16 1,938
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey

No need to make it seem mysterious, ASFAT was not a bidder in I-Class 2-3-4 construction thus military shipyards are already out of the scope.

And there are three options;

TAIS or/and STM gets the project. Pick the wise one.
Dear @Anmdt
You‘ve been mounting suspense by bringing out the same statement and every time I bite my tongue not to ask the question :oops:
Tell it already bro who’s got the tender and end my misery for crying out loud :LOL::LOL:
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Dear @Anmdt
You‘ve been mounting suspense by bringing out the same statement and every time I bite my tongue not to ask the question :oops:
Tell it already bro who’s got the tender and end my misery for crying out loud :LOL::LOL:
This time i just want to see how long it is going to take for some twitter-insiders to find out. I will disclose it at 21th January unless
Maybe it’s just me but the picture won’t load.
Updated.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,156
Reactions
12,883
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Dear @Anmdt
You‘ve been mounting suspense by bringing out the same statement and every time I bite my tongue not to ask the question :oops:
Tell it already bro who’s got the tender and end my misery for crying out loud :LOL::LOL:
I could end your misery but i wont.
We dont trust Murican spies. :cool: :cool: :cool:
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 52231

TF2000, not a double post, a HD version of what is being circulated among the media.
The image, above, was posted at IDEF 21. However some changes took place since then. The old image shows AREAS-2N as the EA system but Navy's armerkom is pursuing for planar arrays with stronger jamming capability.

Also there will be C-ESM and C-ED system on top of rear antennas (C-ED is already present but it is merely a place holder). They have gone for simplistic C-EA but i expect a better one, considering it was a place holder.

At some point they have considered an integrated antenna similar to Japanese Mogami, to combine LOS communication with for UAVs or USVs, C-ESM, TACAN within a unified antenna for the middle antenna position, but the time is limited for R&D.

The antenna holding C-ESM-ED (most rear antenna) is definitely being made to support a low frequency (L / VHF depending on block) Early Warning radar.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,276
Reactions
147 16,481
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
May be one of the main questions we should be asking and discussing here should be if we ought to look in to the development of a VLA missile (Vertical Launch Anti Submarine) system for our Frigates ; especially now that we have an indigenous VLS MIDLAS. Or alternatively use our unmanned ULAQ class vessels for this job.

Greece is buying Belharra frigates with a very advanced towed array sonar (CAPTAS-4 compact) that can detect submarines at distances well beyond of modern torpedos’ effective ranges. This sonar has detection capability of most quiet subs at ranges above 60km.

Aselsan‘s Hızır-LFAS towed array sonar is probably just as good and is still being developed and updated.

To counter submarines we have Roketsan’s ASW rocket system. These rockets can be fired from surface ships with ASW capabilities with a range of 500-2000 metres. Roketsan was working on extending this range to 4000metres. Also within this development the effective depth was to be increased from 300m to 500m.

1672963101114.jpeg


But the submarines can launch their 30-50+ km range torpedoes against our surface ships without getting in to the firing range of these ASW rockets. However with a VLA missile system this range can be extended. But better still by deploying ULAQ class ASW unmanned vessels equipped with these rockets we can extend the effective range of our ASW rockets well beyond any submarine‘s torpedo range. In fact the only limiting factor would be the detection range of the towed array sonar used by the control ship.

1672964645719.jpg

1672964833825.jpeg
HIZIR-LFAS
 
Last edited:

zio

Well-known member
Messages
397
Reactions
7 545
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There are some handicaps for towed low frequency sonars,one is its cumbersome and not ready to go,the other is it can only performed on slow speeds,and more useful on open seas not for island seas.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
i would say: Quantity of Turkish Unmanned surface vessels could suppress quality of enemy submarines.

Please remember when an enemy submarine launches a torpedo and switches long range sonar , the submarine will be detected from our warships.

I would sacrifice one ULAQ in order to catch a position of Greek submarine.


Again i can't understand why ASW rockets Rather than light torpedoes?

The situation similar to new I-Class and TF-2000 frigates. The Navy prefered Gökdeniz 35mm CIWS rather than Gökdeniz ER missiles.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,798
Reactions
98 9,198
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
i would say: Quantity of Turkish Unmanned surface vessels could suppress quality of enemy submarines.

Please remember when an enemy submarine launches a torpedo and switches long range sonar , the submarine will be detected from our warships.

I would sacrifice one ULAQ in order to catch a position of Greek submarine.


Again i can't understand why ASW rockets Rather than light torpedoes?

The situation similar to new I-Class and TF-2000 frigates. The Navy prefered Gökdeniz 35mm CIWS rather than Gökdeniz ER missiles.
It is not that easy to detect a modern AIP boat. harder than detecting an stealth fighter.
And submarines only listen, does not use active sonar.
Anyway, ULAQ would be a great addition to Turkish naval inventory.
 

AWP

Contributor
Messages
764
Reactions
6 1,572
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Palestine
Any news regarding the TCG Barbaros modernization program ?
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,124
Solutions
1
Reactions
35 14,680
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
i would say: Quantity of Turkish Unmanned surface vessels could suppress quality of enemy submarines.

Please remember when an enemy submarine launches a torpedo and switches long range sonar , the submarine will be detected from our warships.

I would sacrifice one ULAQ in order to catch a position of Greek submarine.


Again i can't understand why ASW rockets Rather than light torpedoes?

The situation similar to new I-Class and TF-2000 frigates. The Navy prefered Gökdeniz 35mm CIWS rather than Gökdeniz ER missiles.
Do you think a submarine will fire a torpedo at a USV? Do you think torpedo will be effective? Torpedos are designed for vessels with a certain draft and they are fired against valuable targets. Torpedoes are not effective against speed boats.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom