No, it is derived from sungur. There is no way a single missile would be that heavy.I think it is the weight of a missile.
They also gave the diameter(128mm) of missile.
Latest Thread
No, it is derived from sungur. There is no way a single missile would be that heavy.I think it is the weight of a missile.
They also gave the diameter(128mm) of missile.
Sungur is equivalent of Mistral which diameter is 90mm .No, it is derived from sungur. There is no way a single missile would be that heavy.
Will Milden have VLS capability?
Will Milden have VLS capability?
It will have two kinds of VLS. This was the mind-blowing fact i hinted earlier.
The VLS will be adaptive payload module where non-missile systems maybe carried and deployed. Primarily made to fit the Gezgin and other CMs later BMs and other non-missile systems like smart sensors.
The other VLS better remain secret for now as i couldn't notice it on the drawings.
Then it wouldn’t be difficult to imagine something around 3000 tons or even larger maybe?It will have two kinds of VLS. This was the mind-blowing fact i hinted earlier.
The VLS will be adaptive payload module where non-missile systems maybe carried and deployed. Primarily made to fit the Gezgin and other CMs later BMs and other non-missile systems like smart sensors.
The other VLS better remain secret for now as i couldn't notice it on the drawings.
It will have two kinds of VLS. This was the mind-blowing fact i hinted earlier.
The VLS will be adaptive payload module where non-missile systems maybe carried and deployed. Primarily made to fit the Gezgin and other CMs later BMs and other non-missile systems like smart sensors.
The other VLS better remain secret for now as i couldn't notice it on the drawings.
He actually ‘hinted’ it earlierWhere do you see the VLS on the drawing?
Where do you see the VLS on the drawing?
It is actually an adaptive payload module. Not conventional VLS.
I think this single probably could hold 3/4 gezgin cruise missile.
You mean a modular VLS for different type of missiles ?
At the end it will lead to the same end . But I hope what you say is right since it will give the navy more options than Gezgin missile
It will have two kinds of VLS. This was the mind-blowing fact i hinted earlier.
The VLS will be adaptive payload module where non-missile systems maybe carried and deployed. Primarily made to fit the Gezgin and other CMs later BMs and other non-missile systems like smart sensors.
The other VLS better remain secret for now as i couldn't notice it on the drawings.
It was suggested (it was early last year I guess) that the Dearsan project, L 33, was to be fitted with special service delivery vehicle rather than Milden and STM500.It's the one in red
The one in green is for the special force delivery system . Some submarines have this delivery system but in VLS position . I think it's unlikely for the Milden project .
My opinion is based on comparing pictures of different submarine diagrams . so I might be wrong about the VLS
View attachment 56236
More than 3/4.It is actually an adaptive payload module. Not conventional VLS.
I think this single one probably could hold 3/4 gezgin cruise missile.
I haven't checked that image to be honest.Where do you see the VLS on the drawing?
Ohio Class SSBN or Virginia block V SSN's modules can hold 7 tomahawk each.More than 3/4.
Can Gezgin not launched from torpedo tubes?More than 3/4.
Wasnt the Hisar-Derin project in jeopardy? i remember hearing something like that on Kaner Kurt's Q&A broadcasts.Against helicopters or aircrafts that is flying to detect submarine, Milden can fire Hisar-Derin missile as well.