Well, i think my english is good enough to comprehend that what you say here is that Turks wouldt have been expelled if they didnt settle down in balkans in the first place.Check my comments a little better. I mentioned that the expulsion of Turkish populations from the Balkans and Greek populations from Anatolia is criminal and reprehensible. I think what i am saying is clear! A local is considered to be someone who lives in a place and comes from it genealogically, that is, his parents and grandparents lived there. It is not considered local only a people who live in an area for 700 or 1,700 years. Nor did i support such views.
But do not forget that all these populations settled in the Balkans after the victorious wars waged by the Ottoman Empire against the Byzantine Empire and the Empires of Central Europe. With the war, the countries that rightfully owned these lands expelled the Turks from the Balkans. A total of 5,000,000-7,000,000 Turks emigrated from the Balkans during the period 1783-2016, of which 4,000,000 had emigrated by 1924. Of the 5,000,000-7,000,000 Turks, 1,500,000 lived in Bulgaria and 1,200,000 in Greece. If these Turkish populations never lived in the Balkans then there would not be all this uprooting.
Its like me saying ''if the jews were not rich then nazis wouldnt have killed them for their money, but its a crime though.''