TR Politics

[guest12]

But the whole humanity coming from a man and his rib makes more sense?
Im not an atheist but cmon, some things just make no sense.

Its not naturally evolved by itself either most likely engineered by another being.

 

[Ryder]

But the whole humanity coming from a man and his rib makes more sense?
Im not an atheist but cmon, some things just make no sense.

Rather believe humans come from sharks or reptiles than stupid monkeys.

In Islam we believe we are made from clay. Turkic mythology it is believed the Turks come from wolves.

Wolves>Monkeys.

 

[Ryder]

I seriously hate monkeys and chimpanzees

 

[Ryder]

Charles Darwin was also known for his racism that would make Hitler blush he even wanted the Turks wiped out.

 

[comolokko]

Charles Darwin was also known for his racism that would make Hitler blush he even wanted the Turks wiped out.

they were not Turks bro. today, the percentage of real Turks living in Turkey is around 5%. everyone understand, i will not comment further.
y-dna map

 

[Deliorman]

Rather believe humans come from sharks or reptiles than stupid monkeys.

In Islam we believe we are made from clay. Turkic mythology it is believed the Turks come from wolves.

Wolves>Monkeys.

Primates (and chimpanzees in particular) are the closest animals to humans no matter if you like it or not. Sharks (Fish) and Reptiles are from a completely different class of animals that have nothing to do with mammals.

No matter how obsessively you hate something it won't change the facts.

 

[Ryder]

Primates (and chimpanzees in particular) are the closest animals to humans no matter if you like it or not. Sharks (Fish) and Reptiles are from a completely different class of animals that have nothing to do with mammals.

No matter how obsessively you hate something it won't change the facts.

We come from wolves.

No country with a monkey symbol ever became successful while nations with a wolf symbol became successful.

Examples the Turks and Romans.

 

[Deliorman]

We come from wolves.

No country with a monkey symbol ever became successful while nations with a wolf symbol became successful.

Examples the Turks and Romans.

You don't come from wolves dude. Nobody comes from wolves or the rib of a man, or from clay or other such crazy mythologic non- sense. If you seriously believe that I will advise you to get your head checked.

 

[Ryder]

You don't come from wolves dude. Nobody comes from wolves or the rib of a man, or from clay or other such crazy mythologic non- sense. If you seriously believe that I will advise you to get your head checked.

Mythology is important even if you dont believe it.

Mythology is also important in the foundation of a nation.

 

[mulj]

Charles Darwin was also known for his racism that would make Hitler blush he even wanted the Turks wiped out.

Eugenic movement was directly inspired by his work, you can draw your own conclusion what happened afterwords.

 

[Ryder]

Eugenic movement was directly inspired by his work, you can draw your own conclusion what happened afterwords.

Survival of the fittest makes sense but it also has its problems.

Should weak, ill or even disabled people die out.

Charles darwin made a case that poor people should die off.

His works make sense but a lot of them have holes and insane ideas.

 

[CAN_TR]

they were not Turks bro. today, the percentage of real Turks living in Turkey is around 5%. everyone understand, i will not comment further.
y-dna map
View attachment 24846

Bullshit map.

 

[comolokko]

Bullshit map.

science doesn't lie.

 

[Ryder]

science doesn't lie.

Turkic dna in Turkey ranges from 15 to 30%.

Its not 5 or even 7. Azerbaijan has the same percentage that ranges from 15 to 35%.

In short the Turkic dna of both countries are not lower than 10%.

 

[Xenon54]

Eugenic movement was directly inspired by his work, you can draw your own conclusion what happened afterwords.

No it wasnt, dont invent facts.

 

[Vaggos]

Social Darwinism has been used to justify imperialism, racism, eugenics and social inequality at various times over the past century and a half. It's a misconception of Darwin's original theory of evolution through natural selection which is a scientific theory focused on explaining his observations about biological diversity. So, Darwin is not the one to blame.

 

[Ryder]

Social Darwinism has been used to justify imperialism, racism, eugenics and social inequality at various times over the past century and a half. It's a misconception of Darwin's original theory of evolution through natural selection which is a scientific theory focused on explaining his observations about biological diversity. So, Darwin is not the one to blame.

Charles Darwim still harboured racist views that whites were at top and that certain inferior races need to be wiped out.

Eventhough he did not do the colonialism or the imperialism his views were no different.

Karl Marx did not invent the gulags or the genocide driven famines of the Soviet Union and Mao Zedongs China but his communism contributed to it.

 

[mulj]

No it wasnt, dont invent facts.

Really? I read lot of articles with those claims.

 

[TheInsider]

Lol theory of evolution changed a lot since Darwin. Darwin was the first one to spot the scientific fact of evolution. He tried his best to explain the phenomenon in a scientific way. Scientists who came after him contributed to his work, sometimes expanded his work sometimes corrected some mistakes in detail. After the advances in genetics, there is no doubt that Darwin was %100 right in his general idea. Today we can prove Darwins theory of evolution which explains observed scientific fact and the phenomenon of evolution in controlled lab conditions. Today there is no argument in scientific circles whether the theory of evolution is true or not. You can deny that the world is round, you can deny the theory of evolution and believe the humans were created by god and came from Adam and Eve. Everybody has beliefs and opinions but facts don't care about them.

 

[mulj]

How so? Can you demonstrate transition of species towrds other species.
With all given knowledge and equipment how they did not demonstrate transition from virus to bacteria, for example. Let alone others.
What is only proven is adaptation WITHIN species but that knowledge is more then 1000 years old.