Latest Thread
That power level speaks better to derivative engines towards ship engines, power generation engines and high bypas turbofan engines. That core engine can be used to make such engines. So there can be multiple uses for such an engine where a smaller engine falls short.What are we going to do with 50k lbf engine?
MSB arge engine is similar to the thrust levels of the F135(F35) only usage would be for a single engine fighter jet which was discussed by some analyst kaan being the high end and a single engine stealth being the more economical choice.
Good point. I agree with you 100%. Turkish state institutions carry a weight hence you take heed when they declare stuff.You wouldnt expect that from a Turkish state institution,we are not Iran.
True but this engine has an afterburner which would classify it as a fighter engine. A gas turbine for naval ships are usually deprived from civilian engines because of the time of usageThat power level speaks better to derivative engines towards ship engines, power generation engines and high bypas turbofan engines. That core engine can be used to make such engines. So there can be multiple uses for such an engine where a smaller engine falls short.
We will have to wait for the industry professionals to comment on it.All I got is that they’re “unveiled”. Unveiling what exactly?
True. We even don’t know what we got here.We will have to wait for the industry professionals to comment on it.
Ship engines only use the core of the engine they are derived from.True but this engine has an afterburner which would classify it as a fighter engine. A gas turbine for naval ships are usually deprived from civilian engines because of the time of usage
Mate, which one of the thousand false statements and over-promises do you want me to quote here?You wouldnt expect that from a Turkish state institution,we are not Iran.
Sure, but does that mean they can actually do them? Especially in a timeframe that is relevant? Casually dropping specs and a mock up for a jet engine doesn't scream "propaganda" to you?Maybe but if the intention is propaganda they would just build bigger bombs and missiles. Some of the stuff is actually useful and an IRBM would not be an economical choice but would bolster our deterrence if it is precise but not as a mono block missile with one warhead.
465 in seems like a typo while 46,5 in is 118 cm which is a legit value for such an engine.this one from Orko
465 inches equals 11.8 meters. Has a turbofan with a 12-meter diameter been made? What are the 4 rocket engines in the turbofan engine for? The F-35's engine produces 43,000 lbf with afterburner; in that case, has an equivalent F135 engine been made?
Bro 465 was a typo let’s say. How about four rockets.465 in seems like a typo while 46,5 in is 118 cm which is the legit value for such an engine.
Such rockets are made by bundling several smaller rocket engines, SpaceX's Starship has 33 Raptor engines. This is normal.Bro 465 was a typo let’s say. How about four rockets.
usta nerden tutsan elinde kalıyor.
I am finding hard to take this seriously tbh.
We were talking about Güçhan, 42.000 lb turbofan engine, yes?Such rockets are made by bundling several smaller rocket engines, SpaceX's Starship has 33 Raptor engines. This is normal.
No, the Yıldırımhan rocket.We were talking about Güçhan, 42.000 lb turbofan engine, yes?
Dude you replied my Güçhan turbofan engine post from X, not Yıldırımhan ICBMNo, the Yıldırımhan rocket.
What is with the Güçkan, I may have overlooked.