Because Megapixels are meaningless, What you need is higher quality sensor with high bandwidth that cover all of the visible light spectrum accurately. More information you get from sensor, it is better, as long as information is accurate. And 2$ sensors doesn't capture much information that is meaningful. Capture a video from your phone and watch that, and watch a movie from blu-ray. There is so much more information in high quality movie sensor Captures that your phone won't capture. Algorithms need information not Megapixels on spec sheet.I simply don't get it.
Do you know why they insist on using ancient 1080p daylight sensors. 4k/8k sensors are like 2 bucks at alibaba. You can order millions of them.
Why not use 8k? There are 30+ cell phones that can record video at 8K. Also there are 1000x zoom cameras what's up with super expensive military cameras with low resolution and just 30x zoom?
Here, you can almost see individual hills on the moon from 391.800km with a much cheaper Nikon P1000. Put that on a gimbal, stabilize it and fly at 65000 feet to see the entire country with just 1 HALE like Global Hawk. How hard is THAT?
Category:Mobile phones with 8K video recording - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I have an old 108 megapixel TINY sensor and even with that megapixels matter more than so called "quality", you need to 100% stabilize it with a great gimbal though. Without it it is more blurry than a stabilized big sensor RED camera obviously.Because Megapixels are meaningless, What you need is higher quality sensor with high bandwidth that cover all of the visible light spectrum accurately. More information you get from sensor, it is better, as long as information is accurate. And 2$ sensors doesn't capture much information that is meaningful. Capture a video from your phone and watch that, and watch a movie from blu-ray. There is so much more information in high quality movie sensor Captures that your phone won't capture. Algorithms need information not Megapixels on spec sheet.
Yes, 125x optical zoom like in Nikon p1000 is commercially available if you don't have size constrain.
Tiny sensors are worse. Bigger sensors are better. They can receive more lightI have an old 108 megapixel TINY sensor and even with that megapixels matter more than so called "quality", you need to 100% stabilize it with a great gimbal though. Without it it is more blurry than a stabilized big sensor RED camera obviously.
Pick highest state of the art commercial megapixel sensor and add whatever IR, NIR, UV filters with a tiny electric motor during flight. What's wrong with that, best professionals use filters all the time? Why do you need seperate 120p awful sensors?
Your phone's sensor is likely 8 or 10 bit. While those "big" sensors are likely 16 bit. So it captures 1024 time more data per Frame in same resolution. Even if you increase resolution 4 times. There is still 256 times difference between such sensors? Gotta?I have an old 108 megapixel TINY sensor and even with that megapixels matter more than so called "quality", you need to 100% stabilize it with a great gimbal though. Without it it is more blurry than a stabilized big sensor RED camera obviously.
Pick highest state of the art commercial megapixel sensor and add whatever IR, NIR, UV filters with a tiny electric motor during flight. What's wrong with that, best professionals use filters all the time? Why do you need seperate 120p awful sensors?
Others have pointed out the dynamic range of larger sensor size but the limited transmission rate at 150/300km distance probably has an influence on the sensor size. This will probably improve when we have a few thousand sats in low-earth-orbit. This is a work in planning right now.Because Megapixels are meaningless, What you need is higher quality sensor with high bandwidth that cover all of the visible light spectrum accurately. More information you get from sensor, it is better, as long as information is accurate. And 2$ sensors doesn't capture much information that is meaningful. Capture a video from your phone and watch that, and watch a movie from blu-ray. There is so much more information in high quality movie sensor Captures that your phone won't capture. Algorithms need information not Megapixels on spec sheet.
Yes, 125x optical zoom like in Nikon p1000 is commercially available if you don't have size constrain.
so what does this famous "FSS" stand for that nobody knows? I hope it's not some kind of Russian intelligence service.It has been stated before that KAAN will have a DAS-like system on it. Here's the full list of what sensor payloads KAAN will carry:
And you're not alone, pretty much nothing has been revealed about the FSS so far.
Full Spherical Sensing System. Main element (sensor) is the IRIS-300so what does this famous "FSS" stand for that nobody knows? I hope it's not some kind of Russian intelligence service.
No, I didn't mention optical alert receivers. I commented on optical targeting systems.Also might be talking about the FSS system.
Naming of these things have started to be an issue."There is no limit to communication for GEZGİN!
Since 2021, GEZGİN Mobile Vehicle Satellite Communication Terminals have been providing users with secure and high-speed satellite communication on the move, in all operational conditions. ASELSAN produced it indigenously and nationally."