Latest Thread
Arad over Tavors anytime...it's about time our SF move away from bullpups. I'd prefer they follow the Turks and induct something indigenous like SSS Defense but the Israeli lobby has engrained deep into the Indian acquisition committees and now coupled with the Adani group who happens to be BJP govt's prime sponsor and benefactor, it's extremely hard even for IN (who leads indigenous efforts) to get away from the clutches of Israeli-Adani combo
Arad over Tavors anytime...it's about time our SF move away from bullpups. I'd prefer they follow the Turks and induct something indigenous like SSS Defense but the Israeli lobby has engrained deep into the Indian acquisition committees and now coupled with the Adani group who happens to be BJP govt's prime sponsor and benefactor, it's extremely hard even for IN (who leads indigenous efforts) to get away from the clutches of Israeli-Adani combo
I'm at least glad the Arads and almost all Tavors procured by SF post 2015 have been produced in India with majority of the raw materials also sourced locally
I agree when it comes to Marcos but when IA merged regular Para units with SF, they effectively destroyed the concept of SF in the army and IA doesn't hesitate killing any indigenous project for foreign weaponry. If the positive reviews about M72 are to be true, I'd rather have Paras procure those hoping it'll eventually trickle down to other active units in the valley like RR or JKP SOG to start with and those in NEPlace of origin shouldn't matter when it comes to equipping SOFs - they should get the best there is, period. If Russian FSB & SSO have no qualms about using HK417s and EOTechs, why should you?
SOFs are comparatively few in number. So most of the reasons why you would want local production/IP ownership (which essentially comes down to economies of scale) don't apply to SOF equipment.
Equipment for the regular infantry is a whole different ball game however, and I'm with you on that. Going for AK-203s is stupid.