which one? su 57?
Soooo many out there, take your pick!
Latest Thread
which one? su 57?
Ok, that is an overstatement bro!Soooo many out there, take your pick!
How so ?Ok, that is an overstatement bro!
There is only three 5th gen fighter operational today.How so ?
There is only three 5th gen fighter operational today.
su57 (not true stealth) and j35 still pending.
Not sooo many after all.
F22 still operational, so 4.There is only three 5th gen fighter operational today.
su57 (not true stealth) and j35 still pending.
Not sooo many after all.
how so? f22, f35, j20.F22 still operational, so 4.
It has been discussed in this forum many times. why do it again?What features make an aircraft 5th gen ?
Okay.how so? f22, f35, j20.
these are three fully operational 5th gen fighter.
It has been discussed in this forum many times. why do it again?
i politely disagree.Well then you know that a lot of current and future 5th gen aircraft are missing some of those features.
i think it is the likely configuration.I'm hoping TFX will have this sort of configuration for R/F antennas
1. Main Nose AESA Radar
2. Flank Array AESA radars
3. Wing Root Passive Radar / Radar Warning Receivers
4. Aft Passive Radar / Radar Warning Receivers
View attachment 52020
What you guys think ?
I remember that Temel Kotil said it will have radar coverage for 360 degree, only question i had was the behind of the jet, but with new assembly video and look like su57, it confirms that thats the real planI'm hoping TFX will have this sort of configuration for R/F antennas
1. Main Nose AESA Radar
2. Flank Array AESA radars
3. Wing Root Passive Radar / Radar Warning Receivers
4. Aft Passive Radar / Radar Warning Receivers
View attachment 52020
What you guys think ?
The assembly of all systems on the TFX prototype has been completed.
Apparently they are ready for a potential roll-out, but the decision isn't made by them.Temel Kotil: Tfx There is a roll out on March 18, but we don't have to wait for that date.
UV-based MWS has higher fidelity on lower altitudes with stronger background IR radiation from the surface. UV based MWS like those on the Belgian F-16s or F-15s acquired by Gulf countries have them for a reason and it is especially useful in dry, hot climates. If Turkish focus is to get MMU prepared against potential low-altitude asymmetric attack near the airfield using something like MANPADS, similar to what those Gulf countries are preparing themselves for, by for example the PKK or Greek spec-ops, a UV MWS could perfectly do its job and would arguably be more suited than the IR-based MWS.I hope they don't use UV sensors for MWS.. We should go for MWIR IR like DAS.