• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Bluetooth

Active member
Messages
65
Reactions
4 88
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
The planning for aircraft for the carrier is more important than the carrier itself, I wonder if navy has proper plans for it.
Cooperation with Korea can be helpful.They also have carrier program and you have already worked with them for some projects.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,659
Reactions
15 8,712
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
F35B is better suited given Turkish carrier doesn't have CATABOR.
F35 is better suited for American ships, Turkish ships can only deploy Turkish weapons.

I don't think Türkiye will end up with another lame ass Aircraft Carrier wanna be. My guess is a magnetic catapult will be made in time for deployment. Just look at how we ended up with Kaan which is racing with the best fighters.
 
Last edited:

Nutuk

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,086
Reactions
12 3,864
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
CATOBAR is very expensive, the British intended first purchase of F35C and employing CATOBAR on the ships. But when it became twice as expensive as anticipated the British turned to deploy F35B and no CATOBAR on the aircraft carriers.

My own opinion is that eventually we will purchase also F35B and that unmanned aircraft like Kizilelma and ANKA-3 will be the backbone of the naval air force.

IMO we will have the aircraft carrier like the British Queen Elizabeth without CATOBAR, with a small number of F35B, helicopters and combat drones

That said suppose I am wrong and we somehow manage to create a Turkish version of CATOBAR than I expect Kaan fighter jets (chance is small to be honest)
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,589
Reactions
60 10,081
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm not an objectophile, but this bird is really pushing it! :ROFLMAO:

My heart pounds every time I see this beauty!

GGr_-FsWEAAEcEP
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
5,139
Reactions
104 10,047
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Gentlemen, shall we keep the internal political feud out of here? This is not within the scope of this thread.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,908
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
F35B is better suited given Turkish carrier doesn't have CATABOR.
F-35C has STOBAR mode (logically) if i am not mistaken. The point is F-35C can land with arresting wires, F-35B lands vertically.
 

MADDOG

Contributor
Türkiye Correspondent
Professional
Messages
1,224
Reactions
33 8,047
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Cyprus
Colour me shocked. Do you think there are plans for a naval version of Hürjet, or, a new (maybe smaller) naval TF-X, since we seem to be chasing this dragon come hell or high water.
It would certainly require the establishment of a new project imo.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,271
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,661
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
It would certainly require the establishment of a new project imo.
I sometimes think left hand of our higher ups not only have no idea what the right hand is doing but also don't even realize its limitations or the task they ask of it.

Well, I'm going to put my money on 1xTF35000 powered smaller version of TF-X, after the project is completed and entered into serial production in 2030s.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,225
Reactions
15 1,988
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Some of the things you need for a naval fighter:
Stronger body, larger and stronger landing gear, lower stall speed, higher stability at low speeds ( which probably requires reimagining the wings entirely, arrestor hook, some specialized avionics for ship approach, folding wings, corrosion resistant surfaces and structures. On top of that for a stobar on a shorter carrier you need a lighter frame and / or higher thrust to weight ratio. It also can't be massive if surface area of deck is limited even with folding wings.
 

Radko

Experienced member
Messages
1,521
Reactions
14 2,872
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
I sometimes think left hand of our higher ups not only have no idea what the right hand is doing but also don't even realize its limitations or the task they ask of it.

Well, I'm going to put my money on 1xTF35000 powered smaller version of TF-X, after the project is completed and entered into serial production in 2030s.
my bet is on 2xF-414 class stealth fighter
 
Top Bottom