TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,082
Reactions
27 8,774
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'm not an objectophile, but this bird is really pushing it! :ROFLMAO:

My heart pounds every time I see this beauty!

GGr_-FsWEAAEcEP
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,798
Reactions
98 9,198
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
Gentlemen, shall we keep the internal political feud out of here? This is not within the scope of this thread.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,147
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
F35B is better suited given Turkish carrier doesn't have CATABOR.
F-35C has STOBAR mode (logically) if i am not mistaken. The point is F-35C can land with arresting wires, F-35B lands vertically.
 

MADDOG

Contributor
Türkiye Correspondent
Professional
Messages
1,220
Reactions
31 8,007
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Cyprus
Colour me shocked. Do you think there are plans for a naval version of Hürjet, or, a new (maybe smaller) naval TF-X, since we seem to be chasing this dragon come hell or high water.
It would certainly require the establishment of a new project imo.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,447
Solutions
1
Reactions
17 4,044
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
It would certainly require the establishment of a new project imo.
I sometimes think left hand of our higher ups not only have no idea what the right hand is doing but also don't even realize its limitations or the task they ask of it.

Well, I'm going to put my money on 1xTF35000 powered smaller version of TF-X, after the project is completed and entered into serial production in 2030s.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
966
Reactions
13 1,584
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Some of the things you need for a naval fighter:
Stronger body, larger and stronger landing gear, lower stall speed, higher stability at low speeds ( which probably requires reimagining the wings entirely, arrestor hook, some specialized avionics for ship approach, folding wings, corrosion resistant surfaces and structures. On top of that for a stobar on a shorter carrier you need a lighter frame and / or higher thrust to weight ratio. It also can't be massive if surface area of deck is limited even with folding wings.
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,470
Reactions
14 2,807
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
I sometimes think left hand of our higher ups not only have no idea what the right hand is doing but also don't even realize its limitations or the task they ask of it.

Well, I'm going to put my money on 1xTF35000 powered smaller version of TF-X, after the project is completed and entered into serial production in 2030s.
my bet is on 2xF-414 class stealth fighter
 

MADDOG

Contributor
Türkiye Correspondent
Professional
Messages
1,220
Reactions
31 8,007
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Cyprus
I hope there will be no photos leaked of her through a potato camera. People near Mürted should contain themselves and not upload any media online. The videos and photos should be served by TAI to do justice to the majestic event.
There will be :)
 

Boykaz

Active member
Messages
81
Reactions
2 287
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
KAAN❤️
Countdown...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2024-02-20-08-35-23-062_com.twitter.android.jpg
    Screenshot_2024-02-20-08-35-23-062_com.twitter.android.jpg
    465.5 KB · Views: 295

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
582
Reactions
10 751
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
Building a whole-ass carrier just for Hürjet? Don't know. This seems like buying a Porsche 911 Turbo S and swapping the engine to a renault one with 100hp.
As much as I think Hürjet will be more capable than people think and a nice lightfighter I do not think it is a aircraft you plan a carrier for your navy around.

Kaan is too big. Leaving the only option to either A. procure from another country (F-35B/C, F-18, Rafale-M, J-31) or TAI will develop a new aircraft.

There are so many question marks right now on this project, especially seeing how it won't get serious until we hit the 2030s. We can speculate but who knows what the world looks like in 10 years.
F/A-18 will be out of production soon.

A few years ago I read that KAI foresaw a navalised KF-21 being developed.

India's Tejas N proved to have inadequate capabilities for the IN and was abandoned, to be replaced by a proposed Twin Engined Deck Based Fighter design. The TEDBF may be available some time in the next decade.

Could Turkiye develop its own carrier aircraft in time for any proposed carrier?
 

Baryshx

Contributor
Messages
970
Reactions
8 2,073
Website
www.twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
F/A-18 will be out of production soon.

A few years ago I read that KAI foresaw a navalised KF-21 being developed.

India's Tejas N proved to have inadequate capabilities for the IN and was abandoned, to be replaced by a proposed Twin Engined Deck Based Fighter design. The TEDBF may be available some time in the next decade.

Could Turkiye develop its own carrier aircraft in time for any proposed carrier?
I think there is no other option but Hürjet. Its Naval version will be made. With more advanced features like Aesa radar, stealt, lighter and more powerful engine etc.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,276
Reactions
147 16,481
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think there is no other option but Hürjet. Its Naval version will be made. With more advanced features like Aesa radar, stealt, lighter and more powerful engine etc.
Apart from one word (stealth) I agree with your comment. I can’t see KAAN becoming a naval asset. It is just too complicated, expensive and big to be navalised. We need to walk before we run. May be after Hurjet is adapted in to a naval form at a later date a version of KAAN may be inducted to the naval command on a bigger newer ship that will do it justice.
TAI has got their eye on Hurjet to be navalised going forward. This has been mentioned by several officials. As a trainer and especially as an acrobatic plane, it is logical to expect a very manoeuvrable jet fighter.
It may however, need to have a more powerful engine to compensate the lift deficiency the plane may encounter under full load, especially if it hasn‘t had an increase in wing area to remedy it.

With a decent version of Murad Aesa radar it will be a very capable fighter. As well as performing air to air and air to surface warfare, it will improve and enhance the defensive capabilities of the very carrier it is stationed at.

However, due to its current overall design, I doubt it will be an effective stealthy plane. Had it been designed with a delta wing one would have expected an inherent low RCS value. But it is doubtful. Yet it would however be interesting to see what the current RCS value of our Hurjet is.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom