There's no reason for APU exhaust to be that large.
Latest Thread
There's no reason for APU exhaust to be that large.
There's no reason for APU exhaust to be that large.
If the radar is only 270 degrees then the middle between the engines is either for drag chute or apu . Or they changed design.
The F-35 has no das component in the rear . How do you know this?They will have an array there.
Also IRIS-300 is the Turkish DAS
My guess is that they will be close to F-16s AESAhow powerful are side arrays compared to the nose mounted radar? the modules on the wings have to conform to the shape of the wing, no? so I assume they will be less powerful than MURAD-600? and will they also be X-band?
do we know if they will be on the wings or on the cheeks?My guess is that they will be close to F-16s AESA
Cheeksdo we know if they will be on the wings or on the cheeks?
“Our goal is to finish the first prototype in the first quarter of next year and to start flight tests,” says TAI chief executive Mehmet Demiroglu. That aircraft will be followed by a second prototype due to get airborne in mid-2026, and then a third following early in 2027.
P1 was supposed to fly this year according to the statement he gave July last year when he took over from Kotil.New Statements from Demiroğlu About KAAN!
TUSAŞ General Manager Dr. Mehmet Demiroğlu:
"In the upcoming April, we will see the first flying prototype 1, and three months after that, the second prototype will also take flight. Currently, we are working on 3 prototypes being prepared for flight."
"In addition to those, we are working on one static aircraft, making a total of 4 aircraft in development. Later, we will build 3 more. Hopefully, we will begin our first deliveries to the Turkish Air Force around 2028–2029."
www.defenceturk.net
www.savunmasanayist.com
P1 was supposed to fly this year according to the statement he gave July last year when he took over from Kotil.
![]()
KAAN'ın diğer prototipleri daha fazla uçacak
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Fatih Demiroğlu, milli muharip uçak KAAN'ın test sürecine ilişkin açıklamalarda bulundu.www.defenceturk.net
Now it is second quarter of next year.
One thing he is good at; each time he opens his mouth to give a date he postpones something as if it is the first time he is saying it. And nobody seems to question him.
Just this year in Technofest he said 2 KAANs will fly this year. Then in the same speech he changed it to one will fly this year the other early next year.
![]()
TUSAŞ'tan KAAN için çifte uçuş müjdesi | SavunmaSanayiST
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Demiroğlu, TEKNOFEST KKTC’de SavunmaSanayiST'ye KAAN ve HÜRJET projelerine dair açıklamalarda bulundu.www.savunmasanayist.com
Who will believe him now???
We are still shooting for 2028… ish,” he says, with the exact date to be driven by factors also including the airframer’s supply chain – issues there already have seen it slip its schedule for the first prototype’s debut sortie beyond the end of this year.
It is not that bad. Delivery at the end of 2028 was never a realistic date anyway. A delay in the delivery of a simple component can cause several weeks of delay. They were like pushing crazy counting days and weeks to arrive at the end of 2028. I don't know why, maybe because SSB is against buying Eurofighter and F-16/F-35 while MSB want to buy Eurofighter and F-16/F-35. It is to say, look, you will get the first fighter 3,5 years from now. The first half of 2029 is a realistic target.P1 was supposed to fly this year according to the statement he gave July last year when he took over from Kotil.
![]()
KAAN'ın diğer prototipleri daha fazla uçacak
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Fatih Demiroğlu, milli muharip uçak KAAN'ın test sürecine ilişkin açıklamalarda bulundu.www.defenceturk.net
Now it is second quarter of next year.
One thing he is good at; each time he opens his mouth to give a date he postpones something as if it is the first time he is saying it. And nobody seems to question him.
Just this year in Technofest he said 2 KAANs will fly this year. Then in the same speech he changed it to one will fly this year the other early next year.
![]()
TUSAŞ'tan KAAN için çifte uçuş müjdesi | SavunmaSanayiST
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Demiroğlu, TEKNOFEST KKTC’de SavunmaSanayiST'ye KAAN ve HÜRJET projelerine dair açıklamalarda bulundu.www.savunmasanayist.com
Who will believe him now???
It is good enough if anyone gives a ballpark date when they don't even have to, it is development work and can be vastly off and still very acceptable.Who will believe him now???
He talk about 360 degree coverage.Confirmed %100. Kaan will have 1 nose and 2 cheek AESA radars for approx 270 degree coverage. AESA radars can be utilized as jammers. Kaan will have a jammer antenna between engines that will provide additional coverage, so 360 degree jammming coverage will be achieved.
P1 was also supposed to roll out in may this year and P2 at the end of the year. Couple months ago both were supposed to be on the assembly line(said so by SSB), now there is no sign of both of them. They put GTU together faster than this. You would think they would at least publish pictures of them on the line as they did with GTU, yet nothing.P1 was supposed to fly this year according to the statement he gave July last year when he took over from Kotil.
![]()
KAAN'ın diğer prototipleri daha fazla uçacak
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Fatih Demiroğlu, milli muharip uçak KAAN'ın test sürecine ilişkin açıklamalarda bulundu.www.defenceturk.net
Now it is second quarter of next year.
One thing he is good at; each time he opens his mouth to give a date he postpones something as if it is the first time he is saying it. And nobody seems to question him.
Just this year in Technofest he said 2 KAANs will fly this year. Then in the same speech he changed it to one will fly this year the other early next year.
![]()
TUSAŞ'tan KAAN için çifte uçuş müjdesi | SavunmaSanayiST
TUSAŞ Genel Müdürü Mehmet Demiroğlu, TEKNOFEST KKTC’de SavunmaSanayiST'ye KAAN ve HÜRJET projelerine dair açıklamalarda bulundu.www.savunmasanayist.com
Who will believe him now???
I don't care about other projects. Was is announced SEVERAL times by officials P1 and P2 would be assembled and roll out this year, yes or no? Where are the pictures from the line? Or don't they see a reason for them anymore since there are no elections near?Admins/Mods before you think of deleting this, because use of AI. I asked chatgpt to use only sources and didn't ask it about its opinion, only facts with sources.
Tell me the delays of all 5th gen fighter programs before their serial production started and use only sources
Here’s a summary of the documented pre‑serial‑production delays for the major fifth‑generation fighter programs, based solely on reliable published sources:
F‑22 Raptor (U.S.)
Total development-to‑production delay:
- Expected first flight: mid‑1996
- Actual first flight: 7 September 1997 → approximately 15 months delayed (WIRED, Wikipedia, GlobalSecurity)
- Manufacturing delays (wing, aft fuselage) and avionics integration issues delayed multiple test articles by up to 16.9 cumulative flight‑test months as of early 1999 (GlobalSecurity)
Although low‑rate production began around late 1998 or early 1999, key exit testing milestones were delayed by over a year, pushing official production decisions into 1999 instead of the original 1998 target. (Air & Space Forces Magazine, WorldNetDaily)
F‑35 Lightning II (U.S.)
- DoD’s 2009 Joint Estimate Team estimated the F‑35 was approximately 30 months behind the original schedule (Wikipedia)
- The program was formally re‑baselined in 2011, pushing the IOC from an initial 2010 target to July 2015 (Wikipedia)
Total delay before full-rate production: ~2.5–3 years late before entering full-rate production (Milestone C) in March 2024 (Government Accountability Office, Defence Blog, Simple Flying)
Sukhoi Su‑57 “Felon” (Russia)
- First flight occurred on 29 January 2010, but serial production originally planned for 2015 was repeatedly postponed to 2020, then 2027 or later (GovInfo)
- Contract signed in 2018 for first serial units with delivery delayed—first expected by end 2020—followed by slipped timelines; serial production pushed to 2027 (The Aviationist, blogbeforeflight.net, Army Recognition)
Estimated cumulative delay: ~5 to 7 years from the originally expected 2015 production start to now foreseen around 2027.
Chengdu J‑20 “Mighty Dragon” (China)
- Initial official service entry was forecast between 2017 and 2019, but actual low‑rate initial production (LRIP) only began in late‑2015, with IOC starting around 2017 (Wikipedia)
- Development challenges with the indigenous WS‑15 engine caused ongoing tech delays that persisted into 2020 and beyond, with final engine validation only completed in March 2022 (Wikipedia)
Estimated delay length: ~1 to 2 years relative to mid‑2017 target IOC; full serial production timeline remains less transparent.
Sukhoi Su‑75 “Checkmate” (Russia)
Estimated delay: ~2 years from 2025 target to current 2027 projection.
- Revealed in 2021 with initial production expected in 2025 and deliveries in 2026–2027, but serial production has now been pushed back to 2027 due to sanctions and design/documentation delays (Wikipedia, AeroTime, Army Recognition)
Summary Table
Fighter Originally Expected Serial Production Start Actual / Current Estimate Approximate Delay F‑22 Raptor ~1998 ~1999–2000 ~1 year F‑35 ~2010 (IOC/full‑rate) ~2015 (IOC), full‑rate in 2024 ~2½–3 years before IOC/~14 years before full‑rate Su‑57 ~2015 ~2027 ~12 years J‑20 ~2017–19 IOC ~2017, still engine delays through 2022 ~1–2 years Su‑75 Checkmate ~2025 ~2027 ~2 years
Notes & Nuances:
- These figures reflect observed delays up to the point serial production (or official IOC) began, as documented in the sources; some programs (especially J‑20 and Su‑57) remain ongoing with evolving schedules.
- The F‑35 is special: while IOC occurred in 2015, formal full‑rate production was only authorized in March 2024, representing a very long development‑to‑production ramp. (Reddit, Reuters)
- For J‑20, while LRIP started in 2015 and service entry by 2017, unresolved engine reliability issues stretched into 2022. (GlobalSecurity)
- Russian programs have faced added geopolitical/sanction constraints impacting timelines.
Conclusion
All five major fifth‑generation fighter programs experienced significant delays before entering serial production or IOC—ranging from about 1 year (F‑22) to over a decade (Su‑57). The F‑35 stands out for its multi‑phase delays: late IOC and very protracted progress before full-rate production. All figures above are based solely on publicly documented schedules and reported slips from official or reputable sources.
Let me know if you’d like more detail on any specific case or on sub‑variants (e.g. F‑35B vs C).
Do you know how many companies are working on that project?I don't care about other projects. Was is announced SEVERAL times by officials P1 and P2 would be assembled and roll out this year, yes or no? Where are the pictures from the line? Or don't they see a reason for them anymore since there are no elections near?
The dates get pushed back every 2-4 months now. P1 and P2 supposedly SAID SO by SSB on the line, P1 was supposed to fly at the end of this year.
No pictures, contradicting statements for the last months now. Blaming "supply line" issues for delays on delays. Why was there no stocking up of critical items sources from outside the country?
If there are no signs of life in the coming months there will be delays again, and again they will use non-specific excuses on why P1 and P2 are missing.
You don't put something on the assembly line without every ready to go.
So no I don't believe the "supply-line" excuse either. Something is up and they are trying to buy time. Let's hope it is not something drastic. IMO they have issues getting their hands on the F110 needed and are trying to buy time for CAATSA to get dealt with.
My man you can bs your way with people who might not be versed in these matters but not with me, this the second time you try to "out-argue" me in your own head and the first time you stopped responding because you had no resort to what I wrote i.e. Ukrainian engines for projects.Do you know how many companies are working on that project?
I showed you the delays of other comparable projects of countries with rich aviation history.
Now you can search the reason for those delays.
Maybe you should become an aviation engineer, start working at TAI, then you can tell us the "real reasons" for those delays.
Things don't work like that. According to what you say we should stop producing anything u til we get 40 F110 engines. In that case, we would have nothing in our hand next 20 years. Instead we have a plane flying and several prototypes are in production.I don't care about other projects. Was is announced SEVERAL times by officials P1 and P2 would be assembled and roll out this year, yes or no? Where are the pictures from the line? Or don't they see a reason for them anymore since there are no elections near?
The dates get pushed back every 2-4 months now. P1 and P2 supposedly SAID SO by SSB on the line, P1 was supposed to fly at the end of this year.
No pictures, contradicting statements for the last months now. Blaming "supply line" issues for delays on delays. Why was there no stocking up of critical items sources from outside the country?
If there are no signs of life in the coming months there will be delays again, and again they will use non-specific excuses on why P1 and P2 are missing.
You don't put something on the assembly line without every ready to go.
So no I don't believe the "supply-line" excuse either. Something is up and they are trying to buy time. Let's hope it is not something drastic. IMO they have issues getting their hands on the F110 needed and are trying to buy time for CAATSA to get dealt with.