TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
501
Reactions
3 23 994
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
It's not that simple: if both sides have stealth capabilities, stealth loses its original role as a "long-range advantage" and instead becomes a prerequisite for even surviving in modern air combat. This shifts the actual BVR window to a realistic engagement range of 30 to 60 km, because only in this range can sufficient track quality be established against VLO targets.

At this distance, the nominal range of a missile is hardly relevant. The only decisive factor is endgame energy. This requires BVRAAMs with a basic range of 100+ km, but optimised for high agility in the medium-range band: weapons with dual impulse or ramjet engines that reach Mach 4.5–4.8 or more and continue to provide active thrust in the terminal stage. Only such missiles create a sufficiently large no-escape zone to reliably achieve their effect in a stealth-versus-stealth scenario.

Long ranges of 150–200 km remain relevant against genuine stealth platforms only under extremely specific conditions – for example, with multi-static sensor technology, triangulation, network hand-off between multiple radar sources, or if a target accidentally flies in a very unfavourable aspect. Without this highly networked sensor technology, such a shot loses almost all practical relevance because the target is detected too late or too inaccurately. This means that classic "150+ km" BVR missiles, which were primarily designed to counter Gen-4/4+ jets, are virtually ineffective in the new scenario.

This means that a genuine post-stealth phase is now – or will very soon – emerge. Pure signature reduction is no longer sufficient. The following factors will be decisive:

sensory superiority (AESA, IRST, ESM, LPI data links)

kinetics and endgame energy of the aircraft and the missiles used, and agile platforms with strong energy management.

In this environment, the F-35, for example, will age faster because it is not designed to compete with an equal opponent that has more power, as other stealth platforms are already designed for greater agility and superior energy management. Rather, the F-35 is a BVR shooter mainly against Gen 4+ aircraft.

Stealth remains essential – but only in combination with agility, sensor fusion and high-energy weapons will true superiority emerge in the post-stealth era.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,718
Reactions
17 4,824
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Never. Tying such an important future program to whims of Germany is like giving a loaded gun to a toddler and hoping it wouldn't be able to pull the trigger. If we were to join any 6th gen program, it would be GCAP and even then, I'd highly doubt it.
Never say never and remember the history…

First, Germany has understood the importance of an air superiority combat system. Germany is pushing more than any other country in EU for an armament. Whims will you not see their. We don’t need the project. Germany (most important EU defense project), need them.


In any case, 6th gen is not something we should be truly concerned about imo. I think with 5th gen we have come to the point that next iterations won't be leaps in technology like between 4th and 5th but rather refinements and small improvements. Hell, no one even has a proper definition yet other than everyone going for even flatter geometry to try to reduce to RCS and possibly higher power generation to give the planes better electronic counter measures.

Not concerned, but stay attached not to lose the thread again. Yes, we are working on a 6. Gen fighter jet already (T. Kotil), but there is a lot we can gain (ToT) by entrance the FCAS project. Which will that be, would be seen in the future .

Mastering the 5th gen, longer range AA missiles with seekers and drones to accompany Kaan should be our focus, especially since we have a far limited budget and staff resources than others like China or US or countries in these programs.
One does not exclude the other. We are working on more than one project.
About the budget, Germany has decided for a limitless Defence budget. So, the project is financially save.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,725
Solutions
1
Reactions
45 16,419
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Tempest and FCAS are declared as a 6th Gen. Fighter jet. Do you have other informations?
Yes, I have. It doesn't matter what project owners declare; I have eyes and I can see clearly. Those fighters you mentioned don't have adaptive cycle engines; their geometry doesn't support wide-spectrum stealth. These two can't be added later on. Currently, only China and the US are developing a technological marvel called adaptive cycle engine, and only those countries have managed to demonstrate fighter-level maneuverability and stability without the use of a tail, which is very important for wide-spectrum stealth. If Turkiye one day develops a 6th gen, it will be derived from the experience TAI has been gaining from the Anka-3 project. FCAS is dead and Tempest will probably be a 5th gen with some 6th gen capabilities similar to how F-16 block 70 is a 4th gen with some 5th gen capabilities. BTW both China and the US will deploy their 6th gen in 2030s. Those 2 will be a full generation ahead of the rest.
 

Tabmachine

Committed member
Messages
155
Reactions
4 206
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Heres something interesting I found a while back:

By Wang Haifeng, former Chief Designer at Chengdu

Key Technologies for Co-design of High-Performance Fighter Jets and Engines​

https://hkxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.29978
(you can open the html version and use browser translate on the chinese)

Abstract:

The future operational environment imposes higher and more comprehensive requirements for the performance of fighters, calling for deeper integration between fighter airframe and engine and closer collaborative design during fighter research and development. Building on theories and practices for optimum airframe-engine integration in fighter design in the past decades, this paper proposes a collaborative airframe-engine design concept. Through an analysis of the combat requirements of Penetrating Counter Air (PCA) and other operational concepts, this paper then presents the essential capabilities of high performance fighters and looks into the requirements of future-oriented collaborative airframe-engine design. The key technologies concerning flight performance, stealth characteristics, flight control and aircraft energy are discussed, and the possible implementation approaches and suggestions for design and research are also provided.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,718
Reactions
17 4,824
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, I have. It doesn't matter what project owners declare; I have eyes and I can see clearly. Those fighters you mentioned don't have adaptive cycle engines; their geometry doesn't support wide-spectrum stealth. These two can't be added later on. Currently, only China and the US are developing a technological marvel called adaptive cycle engine, and only those countries have managed to demonstrate fighter-level maneuverability and stability without the use of a tail, which is very important for wide-spectrum stealth. If Turkiye one day develops a 6th gen, it will be derived from the experience TAI has been gaining from the Anka-3 project. FCAS is dead and Tempest will probably be a 5th gen with some 6th gen capabilities similar to how F-16 block 70 is a 4th gen with some 5th gen capabilities. BTW both China and the US will deploy their 6th gen in 2030s. Those 2 will be a full generation ahead of the rest.
About 6. Generation Fighter Jet Specifications:

What Defines 6th-Generation Fighter Aircraft?


About the engine.

 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
884
Reactions
14 1,151
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I read somewhere that the airforce plans are for 150 aircraft total and that the 24 planes pers year are for the beginning stages and are supposed to increase but that depends on international customers.
150 Turkey
(48) Indonesia
With Typhoons in the TuAF, some of the 24 annual production of KAAN could be diverted to exports when the indigenous engine is installed. France even diverted all Rafale production to export for a time. I think Sweden is going to do the same to supply Colombia with Gripen E.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,750
Reactions
218 19,271
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
What defines a generation difference of jet fighters is the very fact that if one plane contains significantly important technologies that can not be retrofitted on to a previous generation plane, than the latter is a generation ahead of the other.

As preliminary prerequisites, 6th generation planes should:

1. fly at much higher service altitudes than previous generation planes.
2. contain technologies that can easily power directed energy weapons.
3. due to 1st point should employ adaptive cycle engines or have technologies that will serve to that effect..

Tempest conforms to all the above.
RR , a company that was developing Variable Cycle engines in late 70‘s for the Concorde and now offering it to India for their AMCA engine, could have easily gone through the VCE route. But chose not to. Instead went for heavy usage of electrification to make up for the VCE. The use of a more electric architecture is intended to replace the need for a traditional variable cycle engine by providing flexibility through software and electrical power management.

For a fact Tempest design picture has changed no less than three times so far. Same goes for the F47. Until both planes start to appear physically, we can only use conjecture.

A plane without vertical stabilisers is very difficult to manoeuvre. That is a fact. If a dogfighting capable jet is expected out of a F47, then it will become a compromise. Yes vertical stabilisers impart problems with stealth. But you can’t have the best of both worlds. We still don’t know enough about the Tempest shape.

In fact if studied, one can see that both Tempest and F47 have very different end use targets.
Key differences include; F47 with a longer range and higher speed at higher altitudes. Yet Tempest is to have a big payload capacity and that it will outperform all current 5th generation planes in all areas. One major advantage that F47 have is that it is at least 4 years ahead of Tempest program.

The crunch lies in this advantage of F47. Japan could easily ditch the program because of it and US pressure, and go with purchasing F47. That would put the spanner in the works for Tempest.


EDIT

According to @Huelague ’s above post, German/French Engine were to be a VCE too.
 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
884
Reactions
14 1,151
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
What defines a generation difference of jet fighters is the very fact that if one plane contains significantly important technologies that can not be retrofitted on to a previous generation plane, than the latter is a generation ahead of the other.

As preliminary prerequisites, 6th generation planes should:

1. fly at much higher service altitudes than previous generation planes.
2. contain technologies that can easily power directed energy weapons.
3. due to 1st point should employ adaptive cycle engines or have technologies that will serve to that effect..

Tempest conforms to all the above.
RR , a company that was developing Variable Cycle engines in late 70‘s for the Concorde and now offering it to India for their AMCA engine, could have easily gone through the VCE route. But chose not to. Instead went for heavy usage of electrification to make up for the VCE. The use of a more electric architecture is intended to replace the need for a traditional variable cycle engine by providing flexibility through software and electrical power management.

For a fact Tempest design picture has changed no less than three times so far. Same goes for the F47. Until both planes start to appear physically, we can only use conjecture.

A plane without vertical stabilisers is very difficult to manoeuvre. That is a fact. If a dogfighting capable jet is expected out of a F47, then it will become a compromise. Yes vertical stabilisers impart problems with stealth. But you can’t have the best of both worlds. We still don’t know enough about the Tempest shape.

In fact if studied, one can see that both Tempest and F47 have very different end use targets.
Key differences include; F47 with a longer range and higher speed at higher altitudes. Yet Tempest is to have a big payload capacity and that it will outperform all current 5th generation planes in all areas. One major advantage that F47 have is that it is at least 4 years ahead of Tempest program.

The crunch lies in this advantage of F47. Japan could easily ditch the program because of it and US pressure, and go with purchasing F47. That would put the spanner in the works for Tempest.
Without Japan I do not think the UK would continue. I think the go/no go for commitment to GCAP is scheduled for the end of this year (I am not 100% sure). Again, I guess that the contract between Japan, the UK and Italy will have very strict terms whereby pulling out will cost the partner concerned a very large amount of money. People in the UK involved in the development of Eurofighter remember Germany wanting the aircraft to be redesigned for a time. That caused a big delay and increased development cost.

I also think that the contract will make it much more expensive for a partner to block exports - as happened with Germany blocking export to Turkiye.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,718
Reactions
17 4,824
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I want to add this specifications .


1."Stealth" is now called "Low Observable"

What used to be known as "stealth", experts have long called "low observable" (LO) - low detectible. It is not only about camouflage cap technology against radar, but about a comprehensive reduction of all signatures: radar, infrared, acoustics and even visible light.

What is striking is that many new designs do not have classic, striking control surfaces. Vertical chinds become smaller – or disappear altogether. Duck wings like the Eurofighter, Rafale or Gripen also seem to have served their time. Some concepts even dispense with moveable front edges on the wings.

The outer skin of the jets becomes smoother, more seamless - a flowing design without unnecessary edges. These include: complex cooling systems that dissipate frictional heat, especially at the hot-stressed front edge of the wing. Because LO no longer refers only to radar waves: Modern infrared sensors - especially since the 5th Generation – recognise heat signatures at long distances. The reduction of both the radar and the heat signature is therefore equally decisive today.

2.Engines: More thrust, more control

If aerodynamic control surfaces are reduced or completely omitted, the control over flight position and course must come from another source - the keyword is thrust vector control. Instead of rudders, the jet is steered by targeted deflection of the engine thrust - fast, precise and with little signature.

But this has its price: At the start, the engine has to perform more if adjustable surfaces are missing to generate the necessary buoyancy.

Modern air-to-air rockets such as Meteor, AIM-174B or the new AIM-260 have ever-increasing ranges. This forces so-called "force multipliers" such as AWACS aircraft or tankers to stay away from the combat area - the risk of becoming a target yourself is too great.

For combat aircraft of the 6th Generation means: more self-sufficiency. You have to carry larger fuel supplies, fly more sparingly - and all this without external additional tanks, because they are not compatible with stealth. A key technology for this is "Supercruise" - the supersonic flight without a post-burner. But the faster you fly, the hotter the outer skin gets. Where exactly the thermal limit lies remains a well-kept secret.

A central problem is the heat inside. The F-35 is already struggling with heat accumulation - ventilation slots for cooling to the outside would be effective, but would compromise the camouflage cap. The cooling must therefore take place from the inside. Next-generation engines must not only provide more thrust, but also provide significantly more thermal and electrical energy – for avionics, sensors, weapons systems and also cooling.

The key to this is the "Variable Cycle Engine" concept (VCE). It allows the engine to switch flexibly between efficiency and performance depending on the flight profile - a quantum leap compared to today's drives.

3.Network-centred warfare: Everything is networked – and multifunctional

Gone are the days when a radar was only a radar, a jammer only a jammer and a radio was only responsible for speech.

Today, transceiver antennas based on Gallium Nitride (GaN) semiconductor modules in conjunction with software-defined transmitting and receiving units enable a completely new level of versatility.

The same system can - as required - act simultaneously as a radar, electronic jammer and as a beam-guided data radio. This reduces weight, saves space and makes the aircraft a highly networked node in the digital battlefield.

4.Communication without traces

Radio silence is ideal - because any active emission can be located by the opponent. Nevertheless, a combat aircraft of the 6. Generation is constantly receiving and sharing information. In order to remain undetected, only minimal energy is transmitted - purposefully and precisely. Since the position and direction of allied units are known, the radio beam can be aligned exactly with this - with the lowest possible transmission power and a narrow beam angle.

This also applies to communication with satellites. Because here, too, the following applies: Anyone who radios widely and strongly risks being discovered by opposing spy satellites. Those who send in a targeted and precise manner, on the other hand, remain hidden.

And there will be a lot to send: As a supersonic, all-round networked multispectral sensor platform, a 6th-class jet is used. Generation to the flying reconnaissance node. It delivers real-time data far beyond the capabilities of classic airspace surveillance – not only for their own combat aircraft, but also for ground troops, ships and even units in near-Earth orbit.

More than an F-35, the 6. Generation to the control centre in a battlefield that is networked across all domains.

5.Sensory: Seeing without being seen

The growing effort to avoid own signatures and to suppress any unnecessary emission is offset by highly developed sensors that can detect even the smallest traces - in all relevant frequency ranges.

Whether optical or radar-based detection, heat signatures or electromagnetic emissions: Every trace, no make weak, is detected, analysed, compared with extensive databases and precisely identified.

The system recognises what is flying, driving or swimming - and classifies it in fractions of a second. The goal is not only early threat detection, but a complete, networked situation picture in real time - without being discovered by yourself.

6.Signature hunting – also in peace

Signatures are always collected – not only in an emergency, but also in times of peace. From the laser beam of a rangefinder to the radar signature of a guided weapon search head: Each signal reveals something about its origin.

In the network network, such emissions can often be passively located and analysed - without sending them themselves. Ideally, this even allows precise location, identification and ultimately a fire line - unnoticed, at a great distance and without activating your own active sensors.

7.Drone control: The faithful wingman

More and more often, manned fighter jets operate in conjunction with unmanned aircraft. These so-called Collaborative Combat Aircraft – also known as “Loyal Wingman” – fly with, but often also ahead.

Equipped with sensors, electronic warfare and precise armament, they take over reconnaissance, deception, target marking or the first strike - often where the risk for manned systems would be too great. The 6th Generation doesn't just think about the swarm fight – it's built for it.

8.Human-machine ratio: The mixture does it

The ratio in which manned and unmanned systems will be procured is still open. Simulations on high-performance computers as well as findings from realistic manoeuvres are intended to provide information on this. But it is already clear now: losses are being calculated - especially on the part of the unmanned wingman. Their comparatively favourable production allows them to be used in high-risk scenarios where the protection of human pilots is a priority.

9.Artificial Intelligence: Data becomes a decision

The highly sensitive sensors - distributed over manned jets and unmanned companion drones - create a huge flood of data. This must be analysed in real time, evaluated and converted into useable information: for target identification, for passing on to the network or for the direct use of weapons.

Artificial intelligence pre-filters these amounts of data - decides what is only transmitted to the combat network and what must be displayed in the pilot's cockpit. It creates a prioritisation of threats, supports tactical decisions and ensures that people keep an overview.

But one thing remains unchanged: The final decision - whether to shoot or not - is always made by a human being.

10.Distance weapons against ground targets: attack from a distance

Modern, multi-layered anti-aircraft systems make it increasingly difficult for even stealth fighter aircraft to penetrate the close range of their targets. The answer is precise distance weapons that can be used far from the actual combat zone.

An example is the new stand-in attack weapon (SiAW) of the US Air Force. It is intended to enable aircraft to attack enemy radar positions and air Defence systems from distances of more than 200 kilometres - without falling within their range themselves. SiAW belongs to the class of Air-Launched Ballistic Missiles (ALBM), i.e. aerial-based ballistic missiles. Prominent representatives of this type are the Russian Kinschal or the Israeli Air Lore - potentially hypersonic fast and therefore extremely difficult to fend off.

At the same time, a new generation of cruise missiles is emerging: smaller, lighter, cheaper, more versatile and faster to produce. Systems with names such as Barracuda or Comet should be available in large numbers - designed to overwhelm enemy air Defence through sheer mass and effectively eliminate even well-protected targets.

11.Smaller, faster, further: next-generation air-to-air missiles

A new European development program is currently dedicated to a future short-range air-to-air missile: the Future Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (FSRM). It is specifically designed to meet the requirements of the 5th and 6th grade. Generation to be customised. The operational requirements have not yet been conclusively defined - but a conceivable ability could be the targeted use against opposing guided weapons.

Developments are also underway on the US side: With the Peregrine of Raytheon and the Cuda of Lockheed Martin, medium-range missiles are being created, which, with a comparable range, only take up half as much space as an AMRAAM - and are supposed to fly faster.

For the next generation of long-range missiles, such as the Long-Range Engagement Weapon (LREW), a two-stage design is emerging. In terms of range, speed and flight altitude, many things remain secret - or simply spectacularly speculative. One thing is certain: the future of these weapons will be multi-stage, faster and more intelligent - and operate well beyond today's standards.

12.Laser: light as a weapon

Bundled light is at the top of the technological agenda - the use of lasers in air combat is no longer considered science fiction, but a foregone conclusion.

Compact laser systems for self-Defence already exist: they are strong enough to blind or even damage the infrared search heads of flying rockets. However, for high-energy lasers in the range of 100 kW, with the potential to launch rockets or drones, there is still considerable technical progress. Currently, such systems require space and weight in the order of magnitude of a truck - so not (yet) an option for combat aircraft.

But the development is progressing rapidly. Miniaturisation, new energy sources and thermal management could soon produce ready-to-use systems.
 
Last edited:

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,052
Reactions
10 7,785
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I want to add this specifications .


1."Stealth" is now called "Low Observable"

What used to be known as "stealth", experts have long called "low observable" (LO) - low detectible. It is not only about camouflage cap technology against radar, but about a comprehensive reduction of all signatures: radar, infrared, acoustics and even visible light.

What is striking is that many new designs do not have classic, striking control surfaces. Vertical chinds become smaller – or disappear altogether. Duck wings like the Eurofighter, Rafale or Gripen also seem to have served their time. Some concepts even dispense with moveable front edges on the wings.

The outer skin of the jets becomes smoother, more seamless - a flowing design without unnecessary edges. These include: complex cooling systems that dissipate frictional heat, especially at the hot-stressed front edge of the wing. Because LO no longer refers only to radar waves: Modern infrared sensors - especially since the 5th Generation – recognise heat signatures at long distances. The reduction of both the radar and the heat signature is therefore equally decisive today.

2.Engines: More thrust, more control

If aerodynamic control surfaces are reduced or completely omitted, the control over flight position and course must come from another source - the keyword is thrust vector control. Instead of rudders, the jet is steered by targeted deflection of the engine thrust - fast, precise and with little signature.

But this has its price: At the start, the engine has to perform more if adjustable surfaces are missing to generate the necessary buoyancy.

Modern air-to-air rockets such as Meteor, AIM-174B or the new AIM-260 have ever-increasing ranges. This forces so-called "force multipliers" such as AWACS aircraft or tankers to stay away from the combat area - the risk of becoming a target yourself is too great.

For combat aircraft of the 6th Generation means: more self-sufficiency. You have to carry larger fuel supplies, fly more sparingly - and all this without external additional tanks, because they are not compatible with stealth. A key technology for this is "Supercruise" - the supersonic flight without a post-burner. But the faster you fly, the hotter the outer skin gets. Where exactly the thermal limit lies remains a well-kept secret.

A central problem is the heat inside. The F-35 is already struggling with heat accumulation - ventilation slots for cooling to the outside would be effective, but would compromise the camouflage cap. The cooling must therefore take place from the inside. Next-generation engines must not only provide more thrust, but also provide significantly more thermal and electrical energy – for avionics, sensors, weapons systems and also cooling.

The key to this is the "Variable Cycle Engine" concept (VCE). It allows the engine to switch flexibly between efficiency and performance depending on the flight profile - a quantum leap compared to today's drives.

3.Network-centred warfare: Everything is networked – and multifunctional

Gone are the days when a radar was only a radar, a jammer only a jammer and a radio was only responsible for speech.

Today, transceiver antennas based on Gallium Nitride (GaN) semiconductor modules in conjunction with software-defined transmitting and receiving units enable a completely new level of versatility.

The same system can - as required - act simultaneously as a radar, electronic jammer and as a beam-guided data radio. This reduces weight, saves space and makes the aircraft a highly networked node in the digital battlefield.

4.Communication without traces

Radio silence is ideal - because any active emission can be located by the opponent. Nevertheless, a combat aircraft of the 6. Generation is constantly receiving and sharing information. In order to remain undetected, only minimal energy is transmitted - purposefully and precisely. Since the position and direction of allied units are known, the radio beam can be aligned exactly with this - with the lowest possible transmission power and a narrow beam angle.

This also applies to communication with satellites. Because here, too, the following applies: Anyone who radios widely and strongly risks being discovered by opposing spy satellites. Those who send in a targeted and precise manner, on the other hand, remain hidden.

And there will be a lot to send: As a supersonic, all-round networked multispectral sensor platform, a 6th-class jet is used. Generation to the flying reconnaissance node. It delivers real-time data far beyond the capabilities of classic airspace surveillance – not only for their own combat aircraft, but also for ground troops, ships and even units in near-Earth orbit.

More than an F-35, the 6. Generation to the control centre in a battlefield that is networked across all domains.

5.Sensory: Seeing without being seen

The growing effort to avoid own signatures and to suppress any unnecessary emission is offset by highly developed sensors that can detect even the smallest traces - in all relevant frequency ranges.

Whether optical or radar-based detection, heat signatures or electromagnetic emissions: Every trace, no make weak, is detected, analysed, compared with extensive databases and precisely identified.

The system recognises what is flying, driving or swimming - and classifies it in fractions of a second. The goal is not only early threat detection, but a complete, networked situation picture in real time - without being discovered by yourself.

6.Signature hunting – also in peace

Signatures are always collected – not only in an emergency, but also in times of peace. From the laser beam of a rangefinder to the radar signature of a guided weapon search head: Each signal reveals something about its origin.

In the network network, such emissions can often be passively located and analysed - without sending them themselves. Ideally, this even allows precise location, identification and ultimately a fire line - unnoticed, at a great distance and without activating your own active sensors.

7.Drone control: The faithful wingman

More and more often, manned fighter jets operate in conjunction with unmanned aircraft. These so-called Collaborative Combat Aircraft – also known as “Loyal Wingman” – fly with, but often also ahead.

Equipped with sensors, electronic warfare and precise armament, they take over reconnaissance, deception, target marking or the first strike - often where the risk for manned systems would be too great. The 6th Generation doesn't just think about the swarm fight – it's built for it.

8.Human-machine ratio: The mixture does it

The ratio in which manned and unmanned systems will be procured is still open. Simulations on high-performance computers as well as findings from realistic manoeuvres are intended to provide information on this. But it is already clear now: losses are being calculated - especially on the part of the unmanned wingman. Their comparatively favourable production allows them to be used in high-risk scenarios where the protection of human pilots is a priority.

9.Artificial Intelligence: Data becomes a decision

The highly sensitive sensors - distributed over manned jets and unmanned companion drones - create a huge flood of data. This must be analysed in real time, evaluated and converted into useable information: for target identification, for passing on to the network or for the direct use of weapons.

Artificial intelligence pre-filters these amounts of data - decides what is only transmitted to the combat network and what must be displayed in the pilot's cockpit. It creates a prioritisation of threats, supports tactical decisions and ensures that people keep an overview.

But one thing remains unchanged: The final decision - whether to shoot or not - is always made by a human being.

10.Distance weapons against ground targets: attack from a distance

Modern, multi-layered anti-aircraft systems make it increasingly difficult for even stealth fighter aircraft to penetrate the close range of their targets. The answer is precise distance weapons that can be used far from the actual combat zone.

An example is the new stand-in attack weapon (SiAW) of the US Air Force. It is intended to enable aircraft to attack enemy radar positions and air Defence systems from distances of more than 200 kilometres - without falling within their range themselves. SiAW belongs to the class of Air-Launched Ballistic Missiles (ALBM), i.e. aerial-based ballistic missiles. Prominent representatives of this type are the Russian Kinschal or the Israeli Air Lore - potentially hypersonic fast and therefore extremely difficult to fend off.

At the same time, a new generation of cruise missiles is emerging: smaller, lighter, cheaper, more versatile and faster to produce. Systems with names such as Barracuda or Comet should be available in large numbers - designed to overwhelm enemy air Defence through sheer mass and effectively eliminate even well-protected targets.

11.Smaller, faster, further: next-generation air-to-air missiles

A new European development program is currently dedicated to a future short-range air-to-air missile: the Future Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (FSRM). It is specifically designed to meet the requirements of the 5th and 6th grade. Generation to be customised. The operational requirements have not yet been conclusively defined - but a conceivable ability could be the targeted use against opposing guided weapons.

Developments are also underway on the US side: With the Peregrine of Raytheon and the Cuda of Lockheed Martin, medium-range missiles are being created, which, with a comparable range, only take up half as much space as an AMRAAM - and are supposed to fly faster.

For the next generation of long-range missiles, such as the Long-Range Engagement Weapon (LREW), a two-stage design is emerging. In terms of range, speed and flight altitude, many things remain secret - or simply spectacularly speculative. One thing is certain: the future of these weapons will be multi-stage, faster and more intelligent - and operate well beyond today's standards.

12.Laser: light as a weapon

Bundled light is at the top of the technological agenda - the use of lasers in air combat is no longer considered science fiction, but a foregone conclusion.

Compact laser systems for self-Defence already exist: they are strong enough to blind or even damage the infrared search heads of flying rockets. However, for high-energy lasers in the range of 100 kW, with the potential to launch rockets or drones, there is still considerable technical progress. Currently, such systems require space and weight in the order of magnitude of a truck - so not (yet) an option for combat aircraft.

But the development is progressing rapidly. Miniaturisation, new energy sources and thermal management could soon produce ready-to-use systems.

Too many words, please be concise.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom