TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
928
Reactions
14 1,205
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
KAAN is projected to go into the serial production in about 4 years.
Of course with the help of European defense companies, KAAN wouldn't have any problems with the engines, testing of the systems, weapons and avionics. Besides it could be a lot cheaper.
Of course, the most logical thing for Europeans would to get, let's say just 150 to 200 aircrafts till European next generation of planes fly. Moreover, they can use it as experience and have Turkiye cooperate in the future projects
Years saved and probably 20bn.
I am not holding my breath , though.
When FCAS would be delivered is very uncertain. GCAP still sounds possible for 2035. I do not think that F-35 users UK and Italy would have any interest in KAAN. If full GCAP development were never agreed, I think that the UK and Italy would buy more F-35 unless the US administration's behaviour worried Europe so much that Europe - for political reasons - decided to stop buying American weapons if at all possible.

Apart from Spain, possibly, I don't see European countries buying KAAN in the near future. However if Dassault left FCAS that would leave Germany and Spain looking for something else to do. Sweden, too, perhaps.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
4,793
Reactions
19 4,928
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
When FCAS would be delivered is very uncertain. GCAP still sounds possible for 2035. I do not think that F-35 users UK and Italy would have any interest in KAAN. If full GCAP development were never agreed, I think that the UK and Italy would buy more F-35 unless the US administration's behaviour worried Europe so much that Europe - for political reasons - decided to stop buying American weapons if at all possible.

Apart from Spain, possibly, I don't see European countries buying KAAN in the near future. However if Dassault left FCAS that would leave Germany and Spain looking for something else to do. Sweden, too, perhaps.
Tomorrow I will call chancellor Merz to talk about a possible cooperation on FCAS with Türkiye.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,175
Reactions
14 8,014
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Neither FCAS nor GCAP will ever materialize, in my opinion.
They have to have something; EF Typhoon++ or F35. If the Russian planes are not so stealthy anyway they can stick with the EF++ and some maybe even go for some Kaan.
 

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
499
Reactions
1 594
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
The issue is the timelines. British led project may or may not have the sufficient numbers by 2040, Italy too. Apart from those 2 cases, there won't be any 5th or 6th generation European plane by then. Or they can field F35s and fall further in technological and combat ready terms.
In their case I would buy F35B . That plane can land anywhere and can take off from anywhere. Can be diapersed. That's huge advantage
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,841
Reactions
227 19,917
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
In their case I would buy F35B . That plane can land anywhere and can take off from anywhere. Can be diapersed. That's huge advantage
Bro, that is on paper and in advertising propaganda information.
1. If it takes off vertically, its operational range is shortened so much that the whole process becomes almost futile. Increased mechanical complexity, reduced internal payload/fuel capacity, less range/endurance and higher fuel consumption during vertical manoeuvres, making it heavier and less capable in weight-limited scenarios.
It already has a disadvantage as it has to carry excess fuel to allow it to land vertically on carriers. To add another disadvantage is not very clever.

2. Operating from non-conformal positions (out in the wilderness or ”dispersed” as you say) will mean a lot of support equipment will have to be present in take off and landing sites. This causes logistical nightmares.
Your airforce land crews will have to be trained accordingly.
To a small and spread apart individual or a few units, you will have to provide the same number of equipment and ground crew that you would for a squadron or two in base.
 

cr33pt3d

Active member
Messages
77
Reactions
6 209
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Anyone with an update on KAAN P1 and first flight date?
Stated for April 26, by now the first P1 must have been assembled or close to be finished, i mean if the first flight is for april, they first have to make some ground tests before. this is just guessing. can't wait to see it with the new front section design :) .
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
928
Reactions
14 1,205
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
The issue is the timelines. British led project may or may not have the sufficient numbers by 2040, Italy too. Apart from those 2 cases, there won't be any 5th or 6th generation European plane by then. Or they can field F35s and fall further in technological and combat ready terms.
In their case I would buy F35B . That plane can land anywhere and can take off from anywhere. Can be diapersed. That's huge advantage
The groundwork to proceed with GCAP has been done. Development company Edgewing was set up mid-2025. While I have no special insight into the programme, as far as I know GCAP is ready to launch into full scale development.

Japan is very keen on an aircraft to enter service 2035 to allow it to start to retire its F-2 fleet. UK has committed to increasing defence spending to 2.7% of GDP by 2027 with a target of 3.0% of GDP by 2030.

Should FCAS fail to progress, Germany may become a GCAP customer. Saudi Arabia has shown strong interest in the aircraft. Subject to neither ITAR nor CAATSA, the aircraft should be available to countries denied access to F-35. Some Gulf states may procure it. Expected to offer exceptional range, the aircraft may be well suited to Australia and Canada's needs.

All in all I would say the factors to warrant a GCAP go ahead exist. I guess that will happen in 2026 to ensure Japan's timeline can be met. Additionally, US actions in 2025 have provided a political imperative to go ahead.

PS I don't see GCAP as a KAAN competitor. Much more expensive and 6G rather than 5G.
 
Last edited:

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
7,044
Reactions
10 5,978
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Stated for April 26, by now the first P1 must have been assembled or close to be finished, i mean if the first flight is for april, they first have to make some ground tests before. this is just guessing. can't wait to see it with the new front section design :) .
In term of design, it won't be much different than P0, right?
 

Pokemonte13

Contributor
Messages
496
Reactions
7 890
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
In term of design, it won't be much different than P0, right?
Well it will be smaller and the engine intakes will be further behind and maybe the vertical stabilizers will change a bit but the biggest change will be in its avionics since P0 was not meant to be fly P1 will have most of his subsystems in place.
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
7,044
Reactions
10 5,978
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Well it will be smaller and the engine intakes will be further behind and maybe the vertical stabilizers will change a bit but the biggest change will be in its avionics since P0 was not meant to be fly P1 will have most of his subsystems in place.
A bit closer to this, huh?
20251213_170635.jpg
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,604
Reactions
12 5,618
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
The groundwork to proceed with GCAP has been done. Development company Edgewing was set up mid-2025. While I have no special insight into the programme, as far as I know GCAP is ready to launch into full scale development.

Japan is very keen on an aircraft to enter service 2035 to allow it to start to retire its F-2 fleet. UK has committed to increasing defence spending to 2.7% of GDP by 2027 with a target of 3.0% of GDP by 2030.

Should FCAS fail to progress, Germany may become a GCAP customer. Saudi Arabia has shown strong interest in the aircraft. Subject to neither ITAR nor CAATSA, the aircraft should be available to countries denied access to F-35. Some Gulf states may procure it. Expected to offer exceptional range, the aircraft may be well suited to Australia and Canada's needs.

All in all I would say the factors to warrant a GCAP go ahead exist. I guess that will happen in 2026 to ensure Japan's timeline can be met. Additionally, US actions in 2025 have provided a political imperative to go ahead.

PS I don't see GCAP as a KAAN competitor. Much more expensive and 6G rather than 5G.



everything on paper yes...
 

Holikarbon

Active member
Messages
39
Reactions
2 89
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well it will be smaller and the engine intakes will be further behind and maybe the vertical stabilizers will change a bit but the biggest change will be in its avionics since P0 was not meant to be fly P1 will have most of his subsystems in place.
When will we see the first real photo? Is it possible before April?
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,604
Reactions
12 5,618
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think that the responsibilities of the different partners are clear. Very little info about the GCAP aircraft design has been released - dimensions, weight, payload, range, speed, engine thrust etc have not been revealed.


Ther is nothing because ther is nothing on paper yet, they are still evulating. Thats the problem with partners joining and forcing ther needs to each other. Maybe ther will be no GCAP like Temptest is scrapped.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom