TR Turkish Air Forces|News & Discussion

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,414
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,932
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Was it not Ukraine instead ?
Yeah, Israel barely uses artillery in their massacre, but people don't let facts get in the way of their agendas, do they? Like for example US paying for those artillery shells and production lines, as they literally bought them.

Or the fact that we hit terrorists in Syria even after US shot down one of our drones. And even before that we hit the targets we thought we need to when we wanted to, if we really did what US wanted to we would've been out of Syria and Iraq completely.

Or the fact that if we got nothing out of Finland and Sweden's NATO membership it is the fault of our own government instead of any other. Even though we did get several embargoes lifted, F-16 and munition/spare parts/upgrade deal approved and now Germany approved munition and spare part/upgrade package sales.

Or the fact that Turkey was removed from the F-35 program while Trump was president and joined the program while Bush was president (production started in 2006 or 2007).
 

Fatman17

Well-known member
Messages
316
Reactions
9 690
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
91-0017.jpg
TUAF-113-filo.jpg

113 Filo "Gazelle (Ceylan)" (TuAF)
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,251
Reactions
141 16,309
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
If this news piece is correct, we are in line to purchase 40 Typhoon fighters with 24 asap and a further 16 to follow, after news of Germany lifting it’s opposition to the sale.
Already the consortium representatives of the 4 countries are in Türkiye, discussing the nitty gritty of the purchase deal for the next 3 weeks.


1728664755445.jpeg
 

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
981
Reactions
14 4,181
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
If this news piece is correct, we are in line to purchase 40 Typhoon fighters with 24 asap and a further 16 to follow, after news of Germany lifting it’s opposition to the sale.
Already the consortium representatives of the 4 countries are in Türkiye, discussing the nitty gritty of the purchase deal for the next 3 weeks.


View attachment 71136

+ to this even though for many it seems impossible people shouldn't be surpised to see a order be placed for F-35s in the near future....

Also don't know how possible the 24 fighters ASAP is as the Air Force wants the Tranche 5 configuration and acc. to the last credible rumours that was also what the brits were offering unless there is a way to upgrade jets to Tranche 5 later on...

Though I haven't been able to find any information on what Tranche 5 even entails.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,414
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,932
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Also don't know how possible the 24 fighters ASAP
Well... since ASAP mean as soon as possible, we'll get them as soon as possible, doesn't necessarily mean it'll be soon. 😁

However, I wonder if we might also get some earlier version two seater trainers if there were any among the ones UK was looking to sell. Getting those in early might be logical if this sale is to go through.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,347
Reactions
79 10,748
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Also don't know how possible the 24 fighters ASAP is as the Air Force wants the Tranche 5 configuration and acc. to the last credible rumours that was also what the brits were offering unless there is a way to upgrade jets to Tranche 5 later on...
There's currently no Tranche 5. Current production aircraft for Germany is the Quadriga, the T4 model. If Turkey signs, it might be the first T5 customer.

Numbers are interesting. I think "ASAP" here could mean close to 5 years.

Quoting my post from august.

One thing to add, If Turkey is able to place an order for EF Tranche 5, which is not yet an active phase, it would also be a carrot for UK and German governments, because costs would decrease. But Turkey being the launch customer for T5, also would mean greater Turkish political interest in the project, which I doubt the same governments would like very much. As Turkey won't be a part of the consortium, noone would want to give some part of the reins to Turkey over the future of the project. For F-35, US was the only voice that mattered, for EF, it's 4 countries. Even if they lower their procurement of the aircraft, they won't want to relinquish control over their baby.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
There's currently no Tranche 5. Current production aircraft for Germany is the Quadriga, the T4 model. If Turkey signs, it might be the first T5 customer.

Numbers are interesting. I think "ASAP" here could mean close to 5 years.

Quoting my post from august.
In 5 years we will be getting our Kaan powered by our TF35K engine, we better not touch somebody else's weapons. The world is changing but our TSK want to stick to old school.
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,414
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,932
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
In 5 years we will be getting our Kaan powered by our TF35K engine, we better not touch somebody else's weapons. The world is changing but our TSK want to stick to old school.
How many times...

IF we are lucky beyond belief and there are no setbacks or complications and IF TEI/TAI aren't exaggerating/overselling their product, we MIGHT get TF35K ready for test flights in Kaan in 2028. At that point, I have to point this out, it would be part of the aerospace history as it would probably be the fastest jet engine ever to get from design to test flight phase.

Even then, we would probably still be a year or two away from having Kaan ready to fly with two working and fully tested TF35K. THEN, we would have to produce both Kaan and TF35K in numbers high enough, which will also take few years, again, if there are no complications.

Some bloody realism mate, please. Despite what armchair generals might think, people in charge of our actual air force and military in general probably have a better understanding of what we need and when we can get it.
 

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,165
Reactions
8 4,680
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
In 5 years we will be getting our Kaan powered by our TF35K engine, we better not touch somebody else's weapons. The world is changing but our TSK want to stick to old school.


If everything goes well first test will start in 2030 begin, how long will the test last?
 

what

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
2,173
Reactions
10 6,431
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Good news. A decent stop gap solution if the price is right
 

Azeri441

Well-known member
Messages
311
Reactions
6 1,323
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
is the F-16V deal still going through if the Eurofighter deal goes through as well?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,683
Reactions
7 7,389
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We are talking about something that is totally up to Turkish engineers performance and the leadership that leads them. Hard work and more resource allocation can speed things up by a good margin. While this is a fact getting in costly long term engagements is only political and not rational. It is only a matter of a 1 year timeframe before unmanned jets prove their worth. With the first Turkish made turbofan engine being available for integration it is only a year before we start retiring older planes and giving weight to the robotic planes. What is this rush to engage long term with people who have conflicts of interest with us. It is only asking for trouble and nothing else. We have already the $1.45bn investment that we are yet to recover and they still want to engage more with the other hand of the same body.
 

Zoth

Active member
Messages
89
Reactions
5 156
Nation of residence
Greece
Nation of origin
Turkey
Will they not buy the 40 F16V from USA? Will they make a switch to 40 Eurofighter T4?
Eurofighter acquisition is totally seperate of F16V package deal, one doesn't cancel the other one. In fact, the f16 package is more important because it contains jet engines which Turkey needs both for Kaan and Hurjet and hudreds of missiles.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,347
Reactions
79 10,748
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,251
Reactions
141 16,309
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Eurofighter acquisition is totally seperate of F16V package deal, one doesn't cancel the other one. In fact, the f16 package is more important because it contains jet engines which Turkey needs both for Kaan and Hurjet and hudreds of missiles.
The 23billion dollar package does not include the engines for KAAN. Nor does it include the F404 engines for Hurjet.
They include 48 F110GE129D engines (the last 30 planes we bought in 2010 had F110GE129B engines)
The KAAN jet uses F110GE129E engine which is optimised for twin engine usage and are the same engines on the F15EX jets.

Eurofighter deal will be for the latest version of this plane according to the statement given by Turkish MOD. The latest version is most probably the Tranche 5 which uses the British Leonardo UK designed ECRS MK2 hybrid Aesa radar (with both GaAs and GaN T/R modules)
 

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,414
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,932
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Hard work and more resource allocation can speed things up by a good margin.
No, it can't. Saying you can speed things up with hard work is like saying all you need is a firm handshake to get a job. And, it is very insulting to suggest that people working on TF35K aren't working hard enough. Shame on you.

And throwing money at it can only help up to point because the bottleneck in this process isn't just the money. Our expertise on engines, especially an engine like TF35K, is limited which also limits the personnel that can reliably and expertly work on it. Throw all our military budget on it, if we don't have enough qualified people that can work on the engine, it wouldn't change a thing.

With the first Turkish made turbofan engine being available for integration it is only a year before we start retiring older planes and giving weight to the robotic planes.
Let me correct you there. We are a year or two away from TF6K start its flight tests which will take maybe a year or two as well; then, if there are not setbacks it'll enter LRIP. Also, pretty much this whole process will have to start again with TF10K, which is the engine that could make KE on par with fighter jets, which is not a guaranteed at all.

While this is a fact getting in costly long term engagements is only political and not rational.
Who are you to say that? Do you know why the air force wants F-16s and EFs? What their plans and expectations are? Do you have the sensitive information they would have on the projects going on right now? What makes your version of events, an outsiders point of view, makes rational while decisions made by people with actual knowledge are irrational?

I think this has to be said, blind faith and support is not patriotism, its nationalism and that is what caused the fall of great many empires. A country turning into rabid yes men only creates complacency and down the road, ruin. Real patriotism is knowing the shortfalls of your country and wanting to fix them, not turning a blind eye to them.

Same thing applies to all of our projects as well. Yes, we have many amazing projects and many success stories, but that doesn't mean we don't need anything from any other country and can take care of ourselves completely. I hope it'll be the case one day, but it isn't right now. We need engines for multiple projects, we need ejection seat for all our planes, we need upgrade packages and munitions and yes, we clearly also need jets.

On top of that, we have to be able to acknowledge that not everything we make or are going to make will be the top of its class every time, which is a behaviour I've seen time and again as well. We don't need everything to be the best in the world, we need them to fulfil the criteria set by our military, pass their tests and work reliably.

As I said before, we need to plant our feet firmly on the ground and get our heads out of the clouds. We have to know what our capabilities and more importantly, our limitations are and instead of stretching ourselves too thin or falling for our own story of our greatness, make logical decisions even if they might seem less than ideal.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom