It is known that at the very beginning, the Greek lobby set out to "ban the sale of f16 to Turkey". The name of the campaign they funded was presented with the title "NoJetforTurkey" and they prepared videos with lies. Later, some factors eroded their intention to use the American system to serve Greek interests rather than US interests and the bills were watered down in the background, and as a result, they were reduced to 2 articles in final. In the last form, after the 1st proposal was cancelled/rejected, the second proposal was put to the vote on a two-condition basis, and even in this situation, it was subjected to the no vote of 179 members. In fact, this issue has been a decisive example in terms of reflecting the real intention of the USA regarding the sale of the F16.
The precondition of "serving American interests" (as if sales serve for Greek interests before this amendment) in the bill is not a new practice. The US system ask this for all sales in the permit process. In the second condition, I think the US authorities will either cancel because it will create a situation contrary to their own internal regulations or they will not listen to Greece's cries of violation of airspace in practice because the US accepts that Greece's airspace (10 miles) is against international law. In this context, the concerns of Greece will not make any sense in this condition as well.
With these joke conditions, the mouth of the crying Greek lobbies was closed. After that, preparations for the approval process for F16V will begin. In fact, Turkey's request for the F16V was determined by the Turkish-American joint committee and emerged as a solution to resolve the issues regarding the F35. At the moment, Greece is trying every way including provocations by violating Turkish Airspace before Mitos's US trip to create a condition for crying to prevent the US's rapprochement with Turkiye.
..
