Wagner Pantsirs were likely export models as well, remember Wagner group needs plausible deniability to distance themselves from the Russian government directly and wouldn't risk sending their front line systems to active warzones without direct Russian military involvement in country and risk losing them to Western forces.
Wagner has brought S-300, Jets, MRAPs but they bring export variants of Pantsir just to conceal their connection? Some of the destroyed systems were known to be operated by Wagner and was known to be Russian variant.
Really i am just curious how far do you plan to go with your claims just to belittle Turkish UAVs?
Claiming 10x-20x difference between export and Russian variant, do you intend to praise Russian systems, cover their shame on losses or belittle turkish UAVs telling "those systems taken out by those UAVs were just toys".
TB2 will be useful against Russian proxies but in any real war I suspect Russia will hit 90% of Polish assets in the first day with cruise and ballistic missile strikes.
And you should as well know, military doctrines are not built upon a single equipment or platform.
Especially when it comes to Turkish UAVs being purchased by another country, the discussion suddenly becomes "Turkish UAV vs entire Russian Army", which doesn't make sense, this is especially such for Turkish UAVs to waste time to prove a point how ineffective they would be against Russian Army. I bet,if Poland was acquiring Reapers, the discussion would never emerge especially by those so called experts who talks in social media.
As far as i know engine, FGPAs, various Garmin and Viasat gadgets. There might be more. It is mostly nationalized as of today.
This is valid for Bayraktar TB2, Anka uses stronger and military purpose equipments and avoids COTS.
What parts are still imported that are vital if any? Obviously Turkey can't produce everything, nobody can except very few countries.
Except few countries? Nobody makes entire of the platforms on their own, it is not cost effective.
