Latest Thread
Anka III's operational radius is estimated to be 1852 km. This means that Anka III, which takes off from İzmir Çiğli, can travel to and from Germany. It also means that Anka III, which takes off from Diyarbakır, can be deployed to Libya without refueling.
It's time to recall the legend.![]()
One day we will compare X47-B with TISU. Until then, keep the X47-B datasheet in your archive.
![]()
1 file shared with you
This file shared with BlackHole. Send any file using blockchain technology.app.blackhole.run
God I hope that is true. I can't wait to see it fly, imo, it'll be a bigger achievement to have a delta wing drone fly than anything drone related we've achieved so far, and we've done a lot.According to some sources, ANKA-3 has already started its taxi trials.
April is just around the corner. As in March, April will be a very exciting month.God I hope that is true. I can't wait to see it fly, imo, it'll be a bigger achievement to have a delta wing drone fly than anything drone related we've achieved so far, and we've done a lot.
April 01, 1923: Second Inenü VictoryApril is just around the corner. As in March, April will be a very exciting month.
April 23rd would be more meaningful. If they stop fighting with the Republic and Atatürk.
The world is no longer so comfortable for countries that support terrorists and separatists, especially Europe and America. What I like most about these drones is that they are a good answer to those who turn countries into bloodbaths.New reality for foreign sponsored terrorists around the world. TB2 should be name peacemaker or liberator.
Probably they are already fitted with easily assembled wings.Baykar should develop foldable wings for TB2 as well. They already have the know-how from TB3
Benefits:
1. Reduce airbase footprint - You can part them closer to each other.
2. Increased mobility - they can be carried to new locations (or export destinations) by truck
3. Increased operationality - they can be transported with aircraft without having to be dismantled first.
What do you guys think?
Folding wings are not actually a function that reduces the logistical footprint, but rather complicates maintenance. The moving mechanics of the wing-roots will also have an impact on the structurals of the aircraft. These aircraft are already transported with the wings disassembled during transportation. The assembly of the wings to the fuselage can easily be done by two technicians at level 1 maintenance in actual operative bases.Baykar should develop foldable wings for TB2 as well. They already have the know-how from TB3
Benefits:
1. Reduce airbase footprint - You can part them closer to each other.
2. Increased mobility - they can be carried to new locations (or export destinations) by truck
3. Increased operationality - they can be transported with aircraft without having to be dismantled first.
What do you guys think?
looks as if the engine nozzle is standing on a carriage. Bet you can't see the nozzle from below say unlike the Okhotnik prototype. Interesting design choice.
Looks like Northrop Grumman designs, hopefully it reduces heat signature significantlylooks as if the engine nozzle is standing on a carriage. Bet you can't see the nozzle from below say unlike the Okhotnik prototype. Interesting design choice.
looks as if the engine nozzle is standing on a carriage. Bet you can't see the nozzle from below say unlike the Okhotnik prototype. Interesting design choice.