- Messages
- 989
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Fake fans? What do you mean?
- Swedish police to investigate reports of information leaks to violent gangs
- China While the foolish Chinese were preoccupied with Taiwan, the sneaky South Koreans took Suyan Islet(苏岩礁)
- Breaking News Street Demonstrations in Georgia
- Demonstrations in Support of Palestine
- TR First Flights of Turkish Aviation Industry
- Messages
- 5,369
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Baryshx
Contributor
One thing that's on my mind is, why are the wings of TB3, which will also land on the ship, thin? It would be good if there was some information about what was done during the design process. Baykar doesn't give much information on these issues
E
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(aeronautics)
In aeronautics, the aspect ratio of a wing is the ratio of its span to its mean chord. It is equal to the square of the wingspan divided by the wing area. Thus, a long, narrow wing has a high aspect ratio, whereas a short, wide wing has a low aspect ratio.[1]
Aspect ratio and other features of the planform are often used to predict the aerodynamic efficiency of a wing because the lift-to-drag ratio increases with aspect ratio, improving the fuel economy in powered airplanes and the gliding angle of sailplanes.
Baryshx
Contributor
When it comes to wing design, this is only part of the story. There are different requirements for take-off and landing at short range and from the ship.
Manomed The Second
Committed member
- Messages
- 296
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
So they still didn't no any real tests?
And you believe they didn't take those into account while designing and building TB3?
Manomed The Second
Committed member
- Messages
- 296
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
- Messages
- 1,216
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Yes, since the drone didn't perform its maiden flight yet.
Baryshx
Contributor
Who would think such a thing? I just wonder what they think. Unlike our other companies, Baykar does not say anything about these issues. It would be good to have some interviews on technical issues. The subject should not come back to issues such as state support, Tusaş, etc.
Edit = I still think that Baykar should have a CEO other than its owners, like in big companies.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 275
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Manomed The Second
Committed member
- Messages
- 296
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Why are they calling it a drone ship? Its a Landing helicopter dock ship
Everyone has been calling it a drone carrier for months and months know, including all our officials. Stop trying to find something to shit on Baykar with for one day ffs. We don't have a plane to fly from it so we are going to use drones, which makes perfect sense btw, hence it is a drone ship.
Manomed The Second
Committed member
- Messages
- 296
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
Its a LHD not a drone ship
Manomed The Second
Committed member
- Messages
- 296
- Reactions
- Nation of residence
-
- Nation of origin
-
It uses more helicopters than It uses drones
You are absolutely unreasonable when it comes to anything related to Baykar. I'm really not going to bother with you at all from now on, there is no discussing anything with you.
