They should first have the confidence to approach things and ask questions before they make fun of your knowledge to others.
Firstly, they are probably wondering how many more launch samples they want to see? Or?
Secondly, I criticized Anka's wing construction. Such sayings have also been used here. Consequently, Anka's wing construction was changed along with the design.
TB3 problems to see and suspect are:
*Wing construction
*Unnecessary applications, which also has a negative effect on weight
*unsuitable and weak gear construction
Operating at sea is a completely different world, which invalidates all engineering knowledge on land. Has TB3 been left on the flight deck at ANADOLU for a month? without doing anything. Just like that: To collect data and remember reactions of material? NO. As you know, ANADOLU is very actively used on the open sea. no securely parked TB3 was to be seen on deck.
Has BAYKAR once disclosed test data :
*How much fuel was the test object loaded.
*How many meters of run-up did TB3 need to take off from the ramp?
* Why is a naked TB3 always used for the tests?
*How many meters does it take for the test object to come to a stop when landing?
*What is the approach speed?
*Why are test videos always cut at the points where we can use some computer-supported measurement applications? And ...and...and..
What does BAYKAR not want to show us, what does not want to tell us? Don't they want to tell us that TB3 from ANADOLU is a failed project.
Yes, with this design, ANADOLU-based TB3 is a failed project.
Last edited:
