TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,746
Reactions
94 9,067
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
1722574797067.jpeg
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,746
Reactions
94 9,067
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh

Yesterday, Baykar showed the 2nd taxi test and what caught my attention in the engine part was that AI-322F was used, as I said.🤦‍♂️
The engine used is the latest model 30F of the latest AI-322.
In other words, the engine used in Kızılelma is not AI-322F, not AI-322 30, but AI-322 30F.

Good observation. AI-322-30F is really new. (2016)

It also has higher thrust. (6600 dry thrust and 11000 wet thrust.)

Though, the main question is, the generators that would power avionics and sensor package. How many KW they can produce?
 

Radonsider

Contributor
Messages
1,467
Reactions
14 2,801
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Good observation. AI-322-30F is really new. (2016)

It also has higher thrust. (6600 dry thrust and 11000 wet thrust.)

Though, the main question is, the generators that would power avionics and sensor package. How many KW they can produce?
thats up to Baykar or supplier they choose. I guess Volt Teknoloji if they dont go in-house.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,684
Reactions
54 4,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 49692
View attachment 49693


Could one AI-322-30F lift HÜRJET?
5000kgf equal to 49kN with afterburner?

İmagine two of these monsters on the Hürjet or on the manned KE! 60kN military power and 100kN afterburner!!

View attachment 49694

View attachment 49695
View attachment 49698

AI -9500F would be great if the engine were tangible.

Could you fit into Hürjet? Seems too long?
View attachment 49696
View attachment 49697
There are images of twin engine TX but too late:(


Looks very similar to KE!!
Baykar aims a manned Fighter?

images (2).jpeg

IMG_20221029_222748.jpg

Turkish_Bayraktar_KIZILELMA_PT-3_Unmanned_Fighter_Jet_Successfully_Completes_Engine_Run_Test_...jpeg
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,340
Reactions
79 10,713
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Looks very similar to KE!!
Baykar aims a manned Fighter?
Engine is usually one of the biggest parts of forcing a design to look a certain way.

I really doubt Baykar is thinking about building a manned aircraft in the future. It's different that everything they know and are used to with much, much thinner margins for error, harder to make money with and would steal resources from their actual goals of an unmanned future.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,340
Reactions
79 10,713
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
She looks awesome. Look at all those protruding antennas and sensors and the LOS antenna. Got years of development ahead of it to be a true very low observable flying wing. Such a hard task at hand.

Hürkuş II cameo appearance @0:30
Really doubt it, they won't use a prototype as a chase plane.
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,038
Reactions
35 4,206
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Look at all those protruding antennas and sensors and the LOS antenna. Got years of development ahead of it to be a true very low observable flying wing. Such a hard task at hand.

No. TAI built this prototype to test a technology, which is new to them, namely a flying wing. That prototype does not even have an IWB and they use stuff from previous ANKA / AKSUNGUR projects. There is no purpose right now to make this prototype a
true very low observable flying wing
.
IMHO making assumptions like
Got years of development ahead of it to be a true very low observable flying wing. Such a hard task at hand.
over a prototype like this doesn't make sense at all.

Or can you back up your assumptions?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,340
Reactions
79 10,713
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
No. TAI built this prototype to test a technology, which is new to them, namely a flying wing. That prototype does not even have an IWB and they use stuff from previous ANKA / AKSUNGUR projects. There is no purpose right now to make this prototype a

.
IMHO making assumptions like

over a prototype like this doesn't make sense at all.

Or can you back up your assumptions?
A flying wing is not a technology, it's a body design. We know that TAI studied flying wings extensively already with scale models and non flying models.

Anka-3 is presented as a prototype for the future flying wing UCAV, not as a tech/capability demonstrator. Whether you call Anka-3 just a demonstrator and the elusive Anka-4 the real deal, that doesn't change my point of the true VLO flying wing UCAV being years away.

If this current design minus the telemetry gear is close to the end product, Anka-3 will not be a VLO aircraft.
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,038
Reactions
35 4,206
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
A flying wing is not a technology, it's a body design.
From ChatGPT:

"Yes, a flying wing can be considered a technology. The term "technology" broadly refers to the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. A flying wing, which is an aircraft design that lacks a distinct fuselage and tail, relying on its wings to provide both lift and control, is the result of advanced engineering and aerodynamics.

The concept of a flying wing involves sophisticated design principles, materials, and systems that enable it to achieve efficient flight. Innovations in aerodynamics, structural integrity, and control systems are all technological aspects that make a flying wing a viable and efficient design, particularly for applications like military stealth aircraft, where minimizing radar cross-section is crucial.

In summary, the flying wing design embodies multiple technological advancements, making it a distinct and specialized example of technology in aerospace engineering."

We know that TAI studied flying wings extensively already with scale models and non flying models.

You can't compare a scale model to the current prototype.
I only said that the purpose of this current prototype is per se the flying wing technology and not a prototype close to serial production.
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,038
Reactions
35 4,206
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Sanchez

Let's hear it from the systems engineering manager of the ANKA 3 project himself.



interview about ANKA 3.

Short summary (feel free to correct me):

- The purpose of this prototype is to test the flyability (they already tested it with a smaller model)
- There are many countries, who want to develope this drone together with TAI (because it is not a well-known technology and hard to obtain)
- After this prototype, TAI will apply stealth features, like a hidden nozzle, RAM paint, etc.
- ANKA 3 will be a family of flying wing drones, there will be lighter and heavier versions, as well as a naval version (the idea of a naval version was known during the design phase)
- TAI has no problem to integrate different engines and sensors to ANKA 3 (a big plus for export)
- There will be a version with TOYGUN and AESA radar
- TAI can integrate all kind of sensors to ANKA 3, which they already have integrated to ANKA and AKSUNGUR
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom