Latest Thread
No video?It seems it had a flight today.
Yesterday, Baykar showed the 2nd taxi test and what caught my attention in the engine part was that AI-322F was used, as I said.
The engine used is the latest model 30F of the latest AI-322.
In other words, the engine used in Kızılelma is not AI-322F, not AI-322 30, but AI-322 30F.
thats up to Baykar or supplier they choose. I guess Volt Teknoloji if they dont go in-house.Good observation. AI-322-30F is really new. (2016)
It also has higher thrust. (6600 dry thrust and 11000 wet thrust.)
Though, the main question is, the generators that would power avionics and sensor package. How many KW they can produce?
View attachment 49692
View attachment 49693
Could one AI-322-30F lift HÜRJET?
5000kgf equal to 49kN with afterburner?
İmagine two of these monsters on the Hürjet or on the manned KE! 60kN military power and 100kN afterburner!!
View attachment 49694
View attachment 49695
View attachment 49698
AI -9500F would be great if the engine were tangible.
Could you fit into Hürjet? Seems too long?
View attachment 49696
View attachment 49697
There are images of twin engine TX but too late
Engine is usually one of the biggest parts of forcing a design to look a certain way.Looks very similar to KE!!
Baykar aims a manned Fighter?
I swear nobody teased as much as Baykar have done in this last year or two since my high school girlfriends. Please, I'm begging for some weapons integration and testing videos Baykar, stop teasing us.Bayraktar #KIZILELMA PT-3
Engine Run and Takeoff Roll Tests
Really doubt it, they won't use a prototype as a chase plane.Hürkuş II cameo appearance @0:30
Look at all those protruding antennas and sensors and the LOS antenna. Got years of development ahead of it to be a true very low observable flying wing. Such a hard task at hand.
.true very low observable flying wing
over a prototype like this doesn't make sense at all.Got years of development ahead of it to be a true very low observable flying wing. Such a hard task at hand.
A flying wing is not a technology, it's a body design. We know that TAI studied flying wings extensively already with scale models and non flying models.No. TAI built this prototype to test a technology, which is new to them, namely a flying wing. That prototype does not even have an IWB and they use stuff from previous ANKA / AKSUNGUR projects. There is no purpose right now to make this prototype a
.
IMHO making assumptions like
over a prototype like this doesn't make sense at all.
Or can you back up your assumptions?
From ChatGPT:A flying wing is not a technology, it's a body design.
We know that TAI studied flying wings extensively already with scale models and non flying models.
interview about ANKA 3.
Short summary (feel free to correct me):
- The purpose of this prototype is to test the flyability (they already tested it with a smaller model)
- There are many countries, who want to develope this drone together with TAI (because it is not a well-known technology and hard to obtain)
- After this prototype, TAI will apply stealth features, like a hidden nozzle, RAM paint, etc.
- ANKA 3 will be a family of flying wing drones, there will be lighter and heavier versions, as well as a naval version (the idea of a naval version was known during the design phase)
- TAI has no problem to integrate different engines and sensors to ANKA 3 (a big plus for export)
- There will be a version with TOYGUN and AESA radar
- TAI can integrate all kind of sensors to ANKA 3, which they already have integrated to ANKA and AKSUNGUR