Yes it could.Could TB3 take-off without a ramp? trying to determine the export potential.
TB-3's engine configuration; PD170/180ST has a maximum take-off power under 200shp, while the 222ST has a maximum take-off power of 222hp as future option. Meanwhile, GA-ASI uses a 450-horsepower Rolls Royce turboprop engine in its system. Naturally, the maximum take-off weight of the rival system can reach over 3 tons, while TB-3 will be about 1.5 tons, maybe in the future with PD-222ST or a small turboprop, it will be about 2 tons. Both systems have advantages and disadvantages against each other. The TB-3 will have a higher power-to-weight efficiency, and possibly a higher flight endurance. It also has a more compact airframe with a shorter wingspan, which could allow it to land on much smaller ships. You can even hide it in a shop under an apartment building and take off from the street, just that alone is an incredibly valuable operational capability. I think it is not the right approach to constantly compare these two platforms.comparison TB3 vs Mojave
And now waiting for that far-east customer to show up at Baykar facilities to negotiate again.Yes it could.
When you say “negotiate again”, top of my head … Indonesia?And now waiting for that far-east customer to show up at Baykar facilities to negotiate again.