TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
219
Reactions
8 414
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think you still need a ski jump on the ship to launch this drone at least with ammunition, just because of the headwind on the open sea + the speed of the ship in the opposite direction which transfers additional pressure on the Drone, it may be even harder to launch a fully loaded light turboprob drone like TB3 without a ski jump. I am not an expert, maybe someone can answer this who really knows if my theory is correct.
 

dBSPL

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Ambassador
Messages
2,294
Reactions
96 11,831
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
comparison TB3 vs Mojave


TB-3's engine configuration; PD170/180ST has a maximum take-off power under 200shp, while the 222ST has a maximum take-off power of 222hp as future option. Meanwhile, GA-ASI uses a 450-horsepower Rolls Royce turboprop engine in its system. Naturally, the maximum take-off weight of the rival system can reach over 3 tons, while TB-3 will be about 1.5 tons, maybe in the future with PD-222ST or a small turboprop, it will be about 2 tons. Both systems have advantages and disadvantages against each other. The TB-3 will have a higher power-to-weight efficiency, and possibly a higher flight endurance. It also has a more compact airframe with a shorter wingspan, which could allow it to land on much smaller ships. You can even hide it in a shop under an apartment building and take off from the street, just that alone is an incredibly valuable operational capability. I think it is not the right approach to constantly compare these two platforms.
 

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
658
Reactions
5 1,028
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
Great to have TB3 on Anadolu but as we all know Enemy SAMs can easy destroy those low speed drones so those can be used only for attack on terrorist with no SAMs ,Even Libya haftaris may hit that tb3 So what Turkiye can do is ANKA 3 or another version STEATHY drone that can be seen by Radar only from 10 km when is too late, To be lunched from Anadolu and even Countries like greece , Egypt , Israel will have hard time to find it and destroy.
 

Osman

Committed member
Messages
267
Reactions
6 525
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Tb3 has some standoff munition choices which are far beyond the reach of air defence of many countries

Kemankeş 1: 200 + km range
Tolun and Tolun IIR: 100 km range
İha 122: 60+ km range

In future

Kuzgun tj: 180 km range
Skywolf gama: 80 km range
Alpagut: 80 km range
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,888
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
When you say “negotiate again”, top of my head 🤔 … Indonesia?
I believe the deal is sealed this time but it doesn't cover TB3, and they show a LHD design based on Anadolu, also rumoring that it will be in construction soon, but no i referred to Japanese. If i recall correctly they have visited Baykar, or somehow got some technical briefing about TB3. The idea intrigues them and i see a high chance of export.
Any Island nation really with undeveloped short and rugged runways imo.
This too, but a low-cost (acquisition, operation, maintanance) drone attracts more customers. And i referred to Japan.
 

Ripley

Contributor
USA Correspondent
Messages
651
Reactions
15 1,851
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
I believe the deal is sealed this time but it doesn't cover TB3, and they show a LHD design based on Anadolu, also rumoring that it will be in construction soon, but no i referred to Japanese. If i recall correctly they have visited Baykar, or somehow got some technical briefing about TB3. The idea intrigues them and i see a high chance of export.

This too, but a low-cost (acquisition, operation, maintanance) drone attracts more customers. And i referred to Japan.
“If i recall correctly they have visited Baykar, or somehow got some technical briefing about TB3.”

I remember when that news came out and I admit I dismissed it right away not because i don’t believe in our hardware but because Japan’s given technological level. I assumed developing a UCAV would be within their capabilities.
But after they saw TB3 landing and taking off with ease, maybe they’ve seen enough and a low cost ready product might convince them.

All in all it’s good news.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom